jkeerie Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Just now, The Frankish Reich said: Just feels to me like 2019 was Peak Ravens. The league catches up with these (Roman) things, and as a general rule running QBs peak early. I was just thinking that Lamar peaked last year.
SirAndrew Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Just now, njbuff said: Who is going to throw to said WR? 😁 Feel free to have any opinion of Jackson that you want. Regardless, you need to give your QB some weapons on the outside. It’s all run game and inside routes from the TE’s. Would you be happy with the Ravens WR corps ? I doubt it, and I think many QB’s would struggle with that supporting cast. Roman simply had no plans of utilizing outside WR’s with Jackson, so they didn’t bother. Eventually, you need someone out there. 1
Ethan in Cleveland Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Just now, The Frankish Reich said: Just feels to me like 2019 was Peak Ravens. The league catches up with these (Roman) things, and as a general rule running QBs peak early. Jackson is not a "running QB". He has 46 TD passes to only 9 career interceptions. He is a great QB. 1 2 1
njbuff Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Not for nothing, but these KC receivers are ALWAYS wide open.
FloridaSnow Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Dr. Who said: I think what you are talking about is actually a counter-history as it involves a non-historical narrative, the sort of thing game theory and possible worlds contemplate. Historical revisionism takes an actual event but then alters the perceived narrative by allocating motives, effects, and judgment differently. It's like turning Christopher Columbus into a villain once one has adopted a quasi-Marxist, anti-patriarchal prism as what will define what is significant. Mahomes as a Bills qb is squarely in the counter-history realm and no one knows, but I seriously doubt he would have had the same level of quick success for reasons you outlined. &@$* is getting real in this discussion thread! I drop in to see info about the game and get a deep dive into historiography. Ya never know what you’ll find! 5
The Frankish Reich Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Just now, Ethan in Portland said: Jackson is not a "running QB". He has 46 TD passes to only 9 career interceptions. He is a great QB. Well, true in one sense. But in another sense his success is as dependent on his scary good running ability as any NFL QB I've seen since Mike Vick. 1
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Dr. Who said: I think what you are talking about is actually a counter-history as it involves a non-historical narrative, the sort of thing game theory and possible worlds contemplate. Historical revisionism takes an actual event but then alters the perceived narrative by allocating motives, effects, and judgment differently. It's like turning Christopher Columbus into a villain once one has adopted a quasi-Marxist, anti-patriarchal prism as what will define what is significant. Mahomes as a Bills qb is squarely in the counter-history realm and no one knows, but I seriously doubt he would have had the same level of quick success for reasons you outlined. Thanks I didn’t feel like explaining it. I disagree about Mahomes though. Tyrod was terrible in 2017 and got pulled for peterman yet still made the playoffs. Mahomes would have been better at the very least and maybe we beat the Jags who ended up almost making the super bowl.
Warcodered Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 I mean you can take a great RB at pick 32 that's not that strange.
jkeerie Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 1 minute ago, njbuff said: Not for nothing, but these KC receivers are ALWAYS wide open. Defenders are playing well off due to their speed.
Bray Wyatt Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Reid giving it back to them, horrible call by one of the best play callers 1 1
Warcodered Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Just now, balln said: dont love going for it well afterwards definitely.
SCBills Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Apparently I’m the only one who’s not orgasmic about CEH.... I mean, he’s good... but not elite. He’s a non-elite, really good running back.... We got one of those in the 3rd. 2
GG Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Bad spit on 3rd down run. The side judge who spotted, couldn't have seen when the knee was down 1
Recommended Posts