Augie Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 I’d be upset if Knox doesn’t catch that ball.
Real McClappy Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 It's ok for Mark to push off and separate. LOL 1
PetermansRedemption Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Just now, Hapless Bills Fan said: Announcers: "Lamar has to find his receivers because it's going to be a passing game" Also Announcers (after Ingram and Jackson 1st downs rushing): "That's what the Ravens have to do" When they were saying that I was just thinking “they don’t have the time to run that offense”. That’s the problem with their slow churning offense. Lack of quick strike ability doesn’t bode well when behind.
Warcodered Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 (edited) Of course they're going for it they're 17pts behind KC. 1 minute ago, Real McNasty said: It's ok for Mark to push off and separate. LOL he was pretty subtle about it which I mean is pretty common. Edited September 29, 2020 by Warcodered
SirAndrew Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Ravens probably would have better served using a draft choice on a WR over Dobbins imo.
balln Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 i can not believe how bad that kroft phantom INT / OPI call was . the variability bw officiating crews / and rule interpretations is insane 1
njbuff Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 1 minute ago, SirAndrew said: Ravens probably would have better served using a draft choice on a WR over Dobbins imo. Who is going to throw to said WR? 😁
Dr. Who Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Just now, PetermansRedemption said: Let me help you. In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account. Therefore, imagining a Mahomes being drafted by the Bills is the exact definition of revisionist history. I think what you are talking about is actually a counter-history as it involves a non-historical narrative, the sort of thing game theory and possible worlds contemplate. Historical revisionism takes an actual event but then alters the perceived narrative by allocating motives, effects, and judgment differently. It's like turning Christopher Columbus into a villain once one has adopted a quasi-Marxist, anti-patriarchal prism as what will define what is significant. Mahomes as a Bills qb is squarely in the counter-history realm and no one knows, but I seriously doubt he would have had the same level of quick success for reasons you outlined. 2 2
BuffaloRebound Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 This is not a well played game by either side. Chiefs should be up by way more and Ravens can’t get out of their own way.
njbuff Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 1 minute ago, balln said: i can not believe how bad that kroft phantom INT / OPI call was . the variability bw officiating crews / and rule interpretations is insane Should have been Bills ball at that point. There was no push off and there was no INT. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Just feels to me like 2019 was Peak Ravens. The league catches up with these (Roman) things, and as a general rule running QBs peak early.
Ethan in Cleveland Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 Just now, balln said: i can not believe how bad that kroft phantom INT / OPI call was . the variability bw officiating crews / and rule interpretations is insane One of the worst calls in years. But not the reason the defense got gashed.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 29, 2020 Author Posted September 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, Gene1973 said: TE pushed off. They often do. Reason some of us salty about the OPI on Kroft 1
Bray Wyatt Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, stuvian said: How did he drop that? Was rushing to get his hand back from the push off 1
Real McClappy Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Warcodered said: Of course they're going for it they're 17pts behind KC. he was pretty subtle about it which I mean is pretty common. Is see that 100 times and never called and ok with it. Kroft makes a huge play and catch and gets flagged and called for a fake INT. Just mind boggling sometimes the inconsistency. 1
Sharky7337 Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 1 minute ago, balln said: i can not believe how bad that kroft phantom INT / OPI call was . the variability bw officiating crews / and rule interpretations is insane It goes in favor of whatever sells the narrative the NFL is trying to sell. These two are the new faces of the league. So they will bend over backwards to let things slide for points to keep it in line with the new narrative
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 29, 2020 Author Posted September 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, njbuff said: Shoulda had that. Good throw. Catchable, but not on point 1
Recommended Posts