Amy Coney Barrett

[Joe Miner]

2 hours ago, Cinga said:

At work so half paying attention through youtube

 

The comments going through whenever a Dem speaks is hilarious!

I watched about 2 minutes if that crap.

 

The idiot from Hawaii was making some impassioned plea about people’s lives.

 

No questions that I heard about cases, legal rulings, interpretation of laws on the books, etc... Anything that might be relevant to determining if a nominee is qualified, prepared, or capable of doing this job.

[B-Man]

SEEN ON FACEBOOK:

 

“Special needs mom of 7 kids having pics of sick children shoved in her face by senators who support late-term abortion up until the moment of birth is the grossest, most ***** up hypocrisy I’ve ever seen.”

 

 

 

 

[Tiberius]

Booker doing a good job showing this nasty pro-life lady who wants to cheer with the House Republicans taking away people’s health insurance. She is gleeful at this 

[shoshin]

43 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Gee, ya think?

 

 

 

This is the cover they are taking for their hypocrisy on the Garland nomination statements. 

 

You don't really think that if the Kavanaugh mess hadn't happened, they would be fine delaying BArrett do you? 

Edited October 12, 2020 by shoshin

[B-Man]

 

16 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:

 

No one should have a problem with the confirmation of Barrett. She is well qualified for the position. I doubt there would be any pushback from the left of it wasn't for Garland.

 

3 minutes ago, shoshin said:

 

This is the cover they are taking for their hypocrisy on the Garland nomination statements. 

 

You don't really think that if the Kavanaugh mess hadn't happened, they would be fine delaying BArrett do you? 

 

 

I guess I will repeat this since the "garland nomination seems to be today's hypocritical fallback.

 

11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Nice try.

 

History did NOT start 4 years ago.

 

 

 

 

[spartacus]

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

I guess I will repeat this since the "garland nomination seems to be today's hypocritical fallback.

 

 

 

The Senate's decision to not consider Garland before the election is tied directly to the mysterious surrounding of how that open seat was created in the first place  

 

[Orlando Buffalo]

2 minutes ago, spartacus said:

 

The Senate's decision to not consider Garland before the election is tied directly to the mysterious surrounding of how that open seat was created in the first place  

 

I thought Garland was replacing Scalia when he died? Am I thinking of the wrong seat? 

[spartacus]

1 minute ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

I thought Garland was replacing Scalia when he died? Am I thinking of the wrong seat? 

absolutely

it is how he died that raises the strong possibliltiy of hank-panky in replacing a strong conservative with a liberal under Obama

 

https://z3news.com/w/ten-disturbing-facts-justice-scalias-death/

 

 

Edited October 12, 2020 by spartacus

[B-Man]

Just now, Buffalo Timmy said:

I thought Garland was replacing Scalia when he died? Am I thinking of the wrong seat? 

 

I believe he is referring to how Scalia died,

 

but that is not really the point of this thread, or the hearing today.

 

 

[Big Blitz]

21 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Booker doing a good job showing this nasty pro-life lady who wants to cheer with the House Republicans taking away people’s health insurance. She is gleeful at this 

 

 

How?  How will SCOTUS take away your health "care?"

 

 

Words matter.  Logic matters.  Facts matter.  

 

 

And, why does that even matter?  Why don't they press judges about whether or not they'd take away my guns.  

Edited October 12, 2020 by Big Blitz

[ALF]

Once the nuclear option was passed to go from 60 votes to confirm a SC Justice to a simple majority all heck will continue to break loose . 

[Tiberius]

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

How?  How will SCOTUS take away your health "care?"

 

 

Words matter.  Logic matters.  Facts matter.  

 

 

And, why does that even matter?  Why don't they press judges about whether or not they'd take away my guns.  

Just rule the health care law unconstitutional. She is a wicked one that will do it

[Cinga]

Harris is up and I'm already tied of her campaign speech

 

[Tiberius]

2 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

How?  How will SCOTUS take away your health "care?"

 

 

Words matter.  Logic matters.  Facts matter.  

 

 

And, why does that even matter?  Why don't they press judges about whether or not they'd take away my guns.  

Just rule the health care law unconstitutional. She is a wicked one that will do it

 

 

Why does it matter? LOL. it doesn't to you, I guess 

[Cinga]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Just rule the health care law unconstitutional. She is a wicked one that will do it

nevermind THAT IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL huh?

[Tiberius]

Just now, Cinga said:

Harris is up and I'm already tied of her campaign speech

 

You should be prepared to be hearing from her for years and years now 

[Big Blitz]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Just rule the health care law unconstitutional. She is a wicked one that will do it

 

 

I want the data that shows lives saved post Obamacare vs before.  Where is it?  

[Tiberius]

Just now, Cinga said:

nevermind THAT IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL huh?

Is it? Or is helping the people just an unconstitutaional idea that Conservatives hate? 

 

Hurt the people! That's their motto. No wonder America is rejecting this sadism 

[Koko78]

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Just rule the health care law unconstitutional. She is a wicked one that will do it

 

Gee, one would think it would be an easier option for Congress to just write a law that is actually Constitutional...

[Cinga]

Just now, Tiberius said:

You should be prepared to be hearing from her for years and years now 

 

As a Senator I know, cause I doubt CA will vote her out anytime soon 🤣