Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have copies of webpage from last year and it was always alphabetical - AFC then NFC with EAST being first division.

 

This year redesigned with NFC first and AFC last.  You can still sort by division and conference but seems an odd design change and cannot see reason other than making AFC East last since T*m Br*dy is no longer in division.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

I think it may be sorted based on the division wins/winning percentage. For instance, the NFC West has 7 wins (listed 1st) and NFC East only has 2 wins (listed 4th). This is true in the AFC standings as well. The only division that doesn't make sense is the NFC South, but maybe that's because NO hasn't played yet. Not sure... just a guess here.

Posted
45 minutes ago, mattynh said:

It’s part of the disrespect to buffalo.   Now it’s weighing down the whole conference. 

yep.  Same reason why they never show the final score of the Buffalo game on SNF if we won that afternoon.

Posted (edited)

Here is my view just now:  sorry not nfl.com  duh...

 

NFLStandings.jpg

Edited by cd1
Posted
9 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:

thats not nfl.com

 

 

Ha Ha - you're right - nevermind...  

Posted

NFL dot com also changed how they show statistics which is pretty bad compared to how they use to do it.

 

One thing that bugs me is player stats don't have the team listed.  You got to look at the picture to see player uniforms.

Why?

×
×
  • Create New...