Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

His last name is Mayfield. People generally refer to football players with their last name. You'll see people make whole lists of quarterbacks, or they'll mention 10 quarterbacks in a paragraph and Mayfield will be the only one whose last name is replaced by his first name. It's just a strange phenomenon to me. It's not like his last name is something hard to spell or pronounce, like Lotulelei.

 

I tent to use first and last names much more interchangeably. I use Josh as much if not more than I use Allen. I have always used Drew at least as much as I use Brees. Surnames only is very old English public school to me.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I tent to use first and last names much more interchangeably. I use Josh as much if not more than I use Allen. I have always used Drew at least as much as I use Brees. Surnames only is very old English public school to me.


Keep your language opinions over there where they belong. We’ve perfected the English language, y’all just keep to youselves. 
 

;)

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:


If it was trash, why weren’t we bottom 3 in defensive scoring?  We were middle of the pack.  
I guess you don’t measure a defense by the points given up...but you will offensive scoring lol?
 

LOL you’ve been proven correct?  This is something that you can be proven correct?  Something subjective?

 

That defense was pretty trash. I tracked it in all the major categories that season..... there is an old thread here on it... but they were awful for points given up per drive against and % of drives against ending in scores. The reason they were middle of the pack in yards and points was entirely due to the offense staying on the field with lots of running and not turning it over.

 

 

 

8 minutes ago, whatdrought said:


Keep your language opinions over there where they belong. We’ve perfected the English language, y’all just keep to youselves. 
 

;)

 

I didn't help myself by starting the sentence with I tent when I mean I tend.....

Posted
8 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

That defense was pretty trash. I tracked it in all the major categories that season..... there is an old thread here on it... but they were awful for points given up per drive against and % of drives against ending in scores. The reason they were middle of the pack in yards and points was entirely due to the offense staying on the field with lots of running and not turning it over.

 


Shaunta from the old BBMB did the same thing for the offense that year.  He tracked everything as well.

 

I’ll trust you since you put in the work.

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Chandler#81 said:

[This is an automated response]

 

As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.

 

Thank you.

    Was just trying to get an in-game board opened up last night because the pinned one was locked halfway through the first quarter.

    Joe beat me to it.

    Lock/ delete this one.

Thanks

Posted
44 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Yes... I find football outsiders a great site for giving a true measure of a specific teams offense, defense, or special teams with the DVOA system as it doesn’t just look at net yardage or net scoring but takes into account different situations and the opponent and compares against the rest of the league.

 

football outsiders had the Bills defense 27th in 2016 and the Bills offense 10th. https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/nfl/team-defense/2016
 

Regardless of what you thought/think of Tyrod anyone who thought the Bills offense wasn’t good in 2016 is flat out wrong, they were a very solid unit. The defense sucked. 
 

 

See above. 

 

DVOA is another measuring stick and isn't flawless...I know what it is.  Guess who was top 10 in offensive DVOA last year?  The Oakland Raiders....the 7-9 Raiders who were 24th in ppg at 19.6 

So without a doubt, the Raiders were a top 10 offense?  Bills and Raiders had the same ppg last year and you often criticize our offense....

 

As I said earlier, Shaunta broke it down game by game.  You didn't even read that thread and saying he's wrong lol.  

Posted
12 hours ago, Bangarang said:

 Burrow is going to be such a good pro

He was my favorite QB since Luck.  I’m not saying Cincy can’t ruin him, but he can be a great pro. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

As I said earlier, Shaunta broke it down game by game.  You didn't even read that thread and saying he's wrong lol.  

 

He was on BBMB you say? Yea. He was wrong.

Posted
12 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

He was on BBMB you say? Yea. He was wrong.


He wasn’t just some idiot.  The guy was a college coach....he understands the game.  It doesn’t mean he’s the universal truth on it but he had solid arguments.

I don’t think our offense was a legitimate top 10 offense.  We struggled to move the ball through the air with any consistency.

Posted

Both QBs looked great for the most part. Defenses were not good, with cincy’s being especially undermanned and not ready on a short week. They lack talent and missing Atkins And Daniels was terrible to try to stop the run. The browns could have just run it on every play. Can’t believe the browns only won by 5. Don’t see either team beating ravens or Steelers.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:


He wasn’t just some idiot.  The guy was a college coach....he understands the game.  It doesn’t mean he’s the universal truth on it but he had solid arguments.

I don’t think our offense was a legitimate top 10 offense.  We struggled to move the ball through the air with any consistency.

 

I was pulling your leg...... it was a dig at the BBMB.

 

He is right we struggled to move the ball through the air with any consistency.... but that is part of the issue with the way people see Greg Roman. It has happened again in Baltimore.... people see run game and find fault with his offense. But he is one of the most innovative offensive minds out there it is just he is run first.

Posted
7 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I was pulling your leg...... it was a dig at the BBMB.

 

He is right we struggled to move the ball through the air with any consistency.... but that is part of the issue with the way people see Greg Roman. It has happened again in Baltimore.... people see run game and find fault with his offense. But he is one of the most innovative offensive minds out there it is just he is run first.


Im hoping that its my leg that you only want to pull.  Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

A note on Teller.  As mentioned PFF graded him out at an elite level last week.  He looks to be a spectator fit in the Browns I/O Zone scheme.  Great, inexpensive (probably flat out lucky if we’re honest) pick up for the Browns.  That all said, he wouldn’t look anything like that in the Bills Power/Gap scheme.  He didn’t do anything in that scheme last year with the Browns just like he didn’t here.  It was the right move by Beane to get something for him. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

If Burrow continues to play like this and the Benglas fire Zac Taylor they are crazy. Keep the offensive side in tact, fire Anarumo and hire an experienced defensive coordinator (might require Mike Brown to put his hand in his pocket though which rarely happens) and draft defense early and often and that team could turnaround quickly next year. The last thing you do is remove the offensive head coach and offensive coordinator who has helped the rook look so comfortable between his 1st and 2nd year because your defense sucks. That is the sort of move BAD franchises make.

 

 

 

Living down here in Cincinnati you learn real quick that the Bengal's do not fire coaches quickly.  Given the covid and Burrow's promising start I would bet that Taylor's job is safe for two more years - at a minimum.

 

 

5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

So my Friday morning thoughts after watching TNF.....

 

 

5. Joe Burrow had a decent night. Not perfect, there were some throws he would like back but credit Zac Taylor and the Bengals for essentially building a system with a lot of familiarity for him from LSU. The one major criticism I'd make, and I did say this in my scouting report on him coming out, is I think he overrates his athletic ability. He took a few hits and sacks on plays where he thinks he can be a runner in the NFL and he can't. He plays with a bit of that Andrew Luck / Josh Allen linebacker style mentality but he isn't the athlete Luck was and certainly isn't the athlete Allen is. Overall though this season for the Bengals is more about Burrow than Ws... and so far, so good. 

6. When AJ Green was linked with the Bills in a trade last season I said I was skeptical he could be what he was after all of the injuries. So far through two games I see a guy who is trying to adapt his game to become more of a possession type receiver in the way that Larry Fitz did. There might be a couple of years left in him as that. But the explosive, downfield playmaker that he once was? Yea.... those days are gone. 

 

 

 

 

These are two good points. 

 

*  Burrow will learn that he needs to surprise teams with his athleticism and not make it a central part of his game.  If you sleep on Burrow he can rip 20 yards off on a run.  But unlike Allen he's not going to break a lot of tackles or stiff arm LB's.

 

*  Maybe he's just shaking off the cobwebs but so far Green has not looked good IMO.  He seems slow and and he's not making the circus catches he used to.  Diggs was a vastly superior pickup at WR compared to Green.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

Stefanski I thought called a great game. They clearly had more talent but still really good with the game plan.

 

Agreed. In very much the way I have argued against a heavy running attack and lots of play action for Josh Allen it is the way I would develop Baker Mayfield. Baker has to play in scheme that can combine the play action boots and rollouts we saw early last night from Stefanski - which requires a functioning run game - with the quick hits pitch and catch type plays out of the shotgun. When he gets himself into trouble is when he holds the football. I thought he missed one throw down in the redzone when he put too much air under the ball for his Tight End and he got greedy on the INT when there was a safe intermediate throw there for him but otherwise Baker played a lot better yesterday than on Sunday and I think it was the right game plan for him.

 

In summary:

- Mayfield needs a scheme that gives him structure

- Allen needs a scheme that gives him freedom

Edited by GunnerBill
Posted
2 hours ago, CincyBillsFan said:

 

Living down here in Cincinnati you learn real quick that the Bengal's do not fire coaches quickly.  Given the covid and Burrow's promising start I would bet that Taylor's job is safe for two more years - at a minimum.

 

 

 

These are two good points. 

 

*  Burrow will learn that he needs to surprise teams with his athleticism and not make it a central part of his game.  If you sleep on Burrow he can rip 20 yards off on a run.  But unlike Allen he's not going to break a lot of tackles or stiff arm LB's.

 

*  Maybe he's just shaking off the cobwebs but so far Green has not looked good IMO.  He seems slow and and he's not making the circus catches he used to.  Diggs was a vastly superior pickup at WR compared to Green.

 

 

 

 

I don’t want to see Allen stiff arm LB’s or breaking tackles. I would rather see Allen run OB or slide a lot more.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...