SectionC3 Posted September 16, 2020 Posted September 16, 2020 Hoax. Looks like Chris couldn’t apply his job-creating and job-saving expertise to help uncle Jerry with the family biz. And the idea that the Jacobs family can’t afford health coverage for 117 departed employees and their families? Another hoax. Those workers must feel like they’ve been clubbed in the head with a hammer. https://buffalonews.com/news/local/delaware-north-pummeled-by-pandemic-cutting-14-of-buffalo-area-full-time-jobs/article_9cc7508c-f75d-11ea-8af0-dfe6aca6d629.html#tracking-source=home-breaking
SectionC3 Posted September 16, 2020 Author Posted September 16, 2020 35 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Dishonest and ignorant, as usual. Rule #2 evidence, please.
Koko78 Posted September 16, 2020 Posted September 16, 2020 46 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Rule #2 evidence, please. Sure, and since you want links, here you go:
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 16, 2020 Posted September 16, 2020 Jacobs is the one who "accidentaly" voted no on a bill. Dude is a moron. "I must've hit the wrong button" 1
Chef Jim Posted September 16, 2020 Posted September 16, 2020 15 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. Looks like Chris couldn’t apply his job-creating and job-saving expertise to help uncle Jerry with the family biz. And the idea that the Jacobs family can’t afford health coverage for 117 departed employees and their families? Another hoax. Those workers must feel like they’ve been clubbed in the head with a hammer. https://buffalonews.com/news/local/delaware-north-pummeled-by-pandemic-cutting-14-of-buffalo-area-full-time-jobs/article_9cc7508c-f75d-11ea-8af0-dfe6aca6d629.html#tracking-source=home-breaking Afford is one thing. Responsible for is another. I thought ACA was going to fix this? So now you're saying that a company is responsible for people they no longer employ?
SectionC3 Posted September 16, 2020 Author Posted September 16, 2020 Hoax. I spoke to “afford.” 26 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Sure, and since you want links, here you go: Circular.
Koko78 Posted September 16, 2020 Posted September 16, 2020 1 hour ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. I spoke to “afford.” Circular. Jape!
SectionC3 Posted September 16, 2020 Author Posted September 16, 2020 2 hours ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: Jacobs is the one who "accidentaly" voted no on a bill. Dude is a moron. "I must've hit the wrong button" Accidentally was well put in quotes. Loser tried to have it both ways. Stick with Trump and still defend the Post Office. He used to be a decent guy. But he sold out. Another one who threw his career away for Trump.
keepthefaith Posted September 16, 2020 Posted September 16, 2020 18 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. Looks like Chris couldn’t apply his job-creating and job-saving expertise to help uncle Jerry with the family biz. And the idea that the Jacobs family can’t afford health coverage for 117 departed employees and their families? Another hoax. Those workers must feel like they’ve been clubbed in the head with a hammer. https://buffalonews.com/news/local/delaware-north-pummeled-by-pandemic-cutting-14-of-buffalo-area-full-time-jobs/article_9cc7508c-f75d-11ea-8af0-dfe6aca6d629.html#tracking-source=home-breaking You're making the case for something I've been saying for decades. Health insurance should not be so tied to employment. In fact it should be illegal for employers to select and provide health insurance for their employees. And no this is not a pitch for Medicare for all or anything similar.
SectionC3 Posted September 16, 2020 Author Posted September 16, 2020 (edited) 8 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: You're making the case for something I've been saying for decades. Health insurance should not be so tied to employment. In fact it should be illegal for employers to select and provide health insurance for their employees. And no this is not a pitch for Medicare for all or anything similar. I’m coming around on that conversation. The pandemic has opened my eyes to a lot of things that I might have dismissed a year ago. Even UBI, which I previously thought to be ridiculous, is a conversation that I would have. W/r/t Jeremy and his ilk, normally I wouldn’t begrudge a business owner who terminated health benefits upon termination of an employee. But these people—billionaires, (and there is nothing wrong with that)—could find a way to take care of their former employees during a freaking pandemic if they felt like it. I’ll think about that the next time I consider an overpriced hot pretzel at whatever it is we call the Ralph these days. Edited September 16, 2020 by SectionC3
Recommended Posts