CBennett Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 15 hours ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said: Carbon Fiber goal posts that are extended 20 ft higher. How about just a laser/infared beam that goes straight up from top of goalposts ffs seriously with todays tech you(or i mean the NFL) cant even get a FG right??? REALLY?? 1
nucci Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 I thought all scoring plays were reviewed...or is that not a scoring play because it was determined no good? In that case could it have been challenged?
Call_Of_Ktulu Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 13 minutes ago, CBennett said: How about just a laser/infared beam that goes straight up from top of goalposts ffs seriously with todays tech you(or i mean the NFL) cant even get a FG right??? REALLY?? I agree, there has to be something that they can do. 10 minutes ago, nucci said: I thought all scoring plays were reviewed...or is that not a scoring play because it was determined no good? In that case could it have been challenged? I saw something that said if it is over the goalposts that it is not reviewable.
nucci Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 19 minutes ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said: I saw something that said if it is over the goalposts that it is not reviewable. ok, thanks
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 On 9/15/2020 at 7:06 PM, PromoTheRobot said: If they can put a camera in an end zone pylon, they can put one on each upright. Or frickin' laser beams. Would adding like 3-4 feet to the top of the upright do something to the structural integrity of them?
whatdrought Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 2 things: 1- FG’s are only reviewable when the ball is clearly between the bars.... and at that point it needs review, why?... 2- the play is not only missing from the All-22, but they subbed in a different play???? Seriously? WTF NFL! 9
YoloinOhio Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 8 minutes ago, whatdrought said: 2 things: 1- FG’s are only reviewable when the ball is clearly between the bars.... and at that point it needs review, why?... 2- the play is not only missing from the All-22, but they subbed in a different play???? Seriously? WTF NFL! I honestly didn’t think much of it until I saw that they removed it from the all 22. That’s shady af 3 1 2
whatdrought Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 23 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: I honestly didn’t think much of it until I saw that they removed it from the all 22. That’s shady af I mean, it’s a problem in of itself but who cares. Kick better next time and remove all doubt. Removing it from the All 22 and putting a separate kick in like it wouldn’t be noticed? That’s just idiotic. 2
QB Bills Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 Easiest solution is to make a crossbar at the top also so it has to go through the makeshift rectangle.
ganesh Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 On 9/16/2020 at 4:39 AM, Ecmic82 said: Don't know about this particular kick, but agree there's no reason not to have tech installed to conclusively solve the problem. Could easily put a camera onto each post pointing directly upward, or a camera fitted into the end of each goalpost, pointed upward with a field of vision equal the goalpost's diameter. Why not change the goal post design to put a horizontal bar at the top...That way your kick is only good if it went through the Uprights as well as within the given height.....I just don't get the NFL's fascination with "ambiguity" in several areas.
RoyBatty is alive Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, QB Bills said: Easiest solution is to make a crossbar at the top also so it has to go through the makeshift rectangle. What? Are FGs now having to go the the square? No, also because it would make the bars very heavy and likely unstable.
GoBills808 Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 5 minutes ago, QB Bills said: Easiest solution is to make a crossbar at the top also so it has to go through the makeshift rectangle. winner
whatdrought Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, QB Bills said: Easiest solution is to make a crossbar at the top also so it has to go through the makeshift rectangle. Isn’t that done in arena or CFL? I feel like I’ve seen that somewhere...
Royale with Cheese Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, QB Bills said: Easiest solution is to make a crossbar at the top also so it has to go through the makeshift rectangle. Definitely not easiest solution. The easiest solution is adding a camera above the goal posts. 1
BarleyNY Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 On 9/15/2020 at 7:56 PM, Jauronimo said: So you admit that there is no camera angle which definitively proves the ball above the upright but you clearly saw the ball pass between the uprights by several feet? Who is uncertain on whether a kick can be reviewed? You can throw the challenge flag on an non-reviewable play and nothing happens. He missed the kick. Get a grip. Throwing a challenge flag on a non-reviewable or automatically reviewed play is actually a penalty. That’s certainly something. 3
RiotAct Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 Just now, GoBills808 said: would need a view from the side to be able to say definitively.
GoBills808 Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 5 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Definitely not easiest solution. The easiest solution is adding a camera above the goal posts.
Recommended Posts