Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, mattynh said:

Woods over Brown but we can’t turn back time. Woods was in a terrible situation in Buffalo for himself. 

Also the price of Brown and Beasley combined is less than Woods

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Cruiserplayer said:

Also the price of Brown and Beasley combined is less than Woods

 

Not sure I agree.   I am am looking at Spotrac correctly you  maybe right with Woods NEW contract but that is an extension, I think he is due about the same as Beasley or Brown this year.  I am sure Woods is getting some kind of a signing bonus but his extension is for years Brown and Beasley are not under contract.   Anyway, not trying to get into a pissing match about who is more valuable dollar for dollar.  The question was who would you rather have.  I am happy with where the Bills are but I think Woods over Brown would be the consensus outside of Buffalo.  It is irrelevant though....just hypothetical

Edited by mattynh
×
×
  • Create New...