Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
59 minutes ago, Bubba Gump said:

Steelers 16-2 on MNF? Did I hear that right? Pretty ***** impressive if true. Seems they would have more appearances on Monday night.

I think that was a Steelers/Tomlin stat.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Billl said:

So your position is that the lack of the run support is evidence that Daniel Jones had it easier?  Jimmy G. must have been incredible against the Packers in the playoffs.  I mean, clearly the entire defensive game plan was designed to shut down the passing game of the 49ers.  Impressive mental gymnastics.

 

Josh has no running support from his running game?  He’s a one man team!  
 

Jones has no support from his running game?  He’s playing on easy mode because clearly the defense is playing the run.
 

Josh gets 100+ yards of rushing from his RBs against the Steelers and throws for 139 yards and 1 TD?    Future superstar!
 

Jones gets 7 yards from his RBs against the Steelers and throws for 279 yards and 2 TDs?  No upside, not impressed.

 

 

Tannehill should have been MVP last year.  Clearly opponents weren’t geared up to stop the run at all.  Otherwise, why was Henry so effective.  CMC must suck.  Otherwise teams would game plan to stop him and he’d have fewer yards.

I'd say facing their prevent defense at the end of the game probably helped Daniel Jones stats.

Posted

The goal line playcalling by Garrett was mindbogglingly moronic, on both series. He likely cost them 14 points. Get the ball to one of the top RBs in the league, or design fancy roll-out plays for a QB with 13 career starts? The NY media is going to love him.

×
×
  • Create New...