Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 On 9/17/2020 at 4:27 PM, SectionC3 said: You forgot your comma after concise. Expand When you've lost an argument you go after grammar. Borrrrrrrring!
SectionC3 Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 On 9/17/2020 at 4:39 PM, Chef Jim said: When you've lost an argument you go after grammar. Borrrrrrrring! Expand Hoax. I am to improve the lives of all. Mr. Third n’ Long gave me some sagacious advice about courtroom demeanor. I always take stock of things conspiracy theory randos say on the Internet and, to improve the chances that others will take the advice of this savant, I thought it appropriate to help him with his grammar. He has a lot of important knowledge to share, especially on topics like fake hoaxes, the simultaneous overplay and underplay of COVID-19, pretend conservatism, the raking of forests, and triggered libs, and it’s important that it reach open minds.
RochesterRob Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 On 9/17/2020 at 4:39 PM, Chef Jim said: When you've lost an argument you go after grammar. Borrrrrrrring! Expand Actually, he trots out the word hoax. I wonder what he considers UFO's and Big Foot to be?
All_Pro_Bills Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 Like the Area 51 organizers faced last year when they suggests thousands show up to storm the installation (jokingly they later claimed) I suggest the Secret Service provide "fair warning" to the leadership and organizers of this White House siege event they will be immediately arrested on sedition and riot charges and prosecuted to the fullest extent under Federal law if any violence and anarchy breaks out. Peaceful protests will be respected and provided the legal protections provided under law. But anyone dumb enough to attempt breaching the White House grounds will be neutralized by whatever means is necessary without hesitation or exception. 1
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 On 9/17/2020 at 5:59 PM, Chef Jim said: Any update on this? Expand Check with Foxxy - apparently she's got the intel on this #FakeNews event. On 9/17/2020 at 6:01 PM, All_Pro_Bills said: Like the Area 51 organizers faced last year when they suggests thousands show up to storm the installation (jokingly they later claimed) Expand Will someone Naruto Run through the White House? I hope to see it.
3rdnlng Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 (edited) On 9/17/2020 at 4:44 PM, SectionC3 said: Hoax. I am to improve the lives of all. Mr. Third n’ Long gave me some sagacious advice about courtroom demeanor. I always take stock of things conspiracy theory randos say on the Internet and, to improve the chances that others will take the advice of this savant, I thought it appropriate to help him with his grammar. He has a lot of important knowledge to share, especially on topics like fake hoaxes, the simultaneous overplay and underplay of COVID-19, pretend conservatism, the raking of forests, and triggered libs, and it’s important that it reach open minds. Expand Except your asinine correction was wrong. It's rare to need a comma in front of the word "and". This is what I wrote: As an aside, why don't you act as if you are in court representing a client in a clear, concise and reasonable manner. Nothing wrong with that in any way, except I should have ended it with a question mark instead of a period, something you didn't pick up on. I can see why you never got above 3rd Chair status. Edited September 18, 2020 by 3rdnlng 1
SectionC3 Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 (edited) On 9/18/2020 at 12:11 AM, 3rdnlng said: Except your asinine correction was wrong. It's rare to need a comma in front of the word "and". This is what I wrote: As an aside, why don't you act as if you are in court representing a client in a clear, concise and reasonable manner. Nothing wrong with that in any way, except I should have ended it with a question mark instead of a period, something you didn't pick up on. I can see why you never got above 3rd Chair status. Expand Hoax. Did you mean (1) reasonable, as well as (2) concise, or "reasonable and concise?" The additional comma matters. Edited September 18, 2020 by SectionC3
3rdnlng Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 On 9/18/2020 at 12:31 AM, SectionC3 said: Hoax. Did you mean (1) reasonable, as well as (2) concise, or "reasonable and concise?" The additional comma matters. Expand What did I write?
716er Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 (edited) Is this close to real? Edited September 18, 2020 by 716er
ziltoid Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 On 9/18/2020 at 12:57 AM, 716er said: Is this close to real? Expand I ask myself the same thing when I see a grammar argument on the internet.
B-Man Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 On 9/18/2020 at 1:20 AM, BeerLeagueHockey said: I ask myself the same thing when I see a grammar argument on the internet. Expand 5 1
Chef Jim Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 Anyone have an update? Can I go outside?
B-Man Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 On 9/18/2020 at 2:10 AM, Chef Jim said: Anyone have an update? Can I go outside? Expand Are you in the White House ? 😇 1
Chef Jim Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 On 9/18/2020 at 2:13 AM, B-Man said: Are you in the White House ? 😇 Expand A White House.
KD in CA Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 If Trump wins again will they just keep going and make it a 1500 day whining slacker stoner fest siege?
Foxx Posted September 18, 2020 Author Posted September 18, 2020 On 9/18/2020 at 12:11 AM, 3rdnlng said: Except your asinine correction was wrong. It's rare to need a comma in front of the word "and". This is what I wrote: As an aside, why don't you act as if you are in court representing a client in a clear, concise and reasonable manner. Nothing wrong with that in any way, except I should have ended it with a question mark instead of a period, something you didn't pick up on. I can see why you never got above 3rd Chair status. Expand without the question mark, it implies the statement as being rhetorical. On 9/18/2020 at 12:31 AM, SectionC3 said: Hoax. Did you mean (1) reasonable, as well as (2) concise, or "reasonable and concise?" The additional comma matters. Expand idiot.
3rdnlng Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 On 9/18/2020 at 3:24 AM, Foxx said: without the question mark, it implies the statement as being rhetorical. idiot. Expand Do you actually think that he could tell the difference? It took him 4 years to get thru community college. Can't imagine what he had to pay Grenada University for his law "degree". 1
Recommended Posts