Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 5:44 PM, SectionC3 said:

Probably depends on the insurance situation.  But on balance it’s probably a reasonable theory. 

Expand  

Tricky part is once you get it close to the surface you'd have to figure out a way to pump out the water.  May have to raise my estiamte by $1,000 or so.

Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 5:45 PM, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

How much is that $30K boat worth, though, after being underwater for a couple weeks? Maybe $10-15K after spending hours of labor to repair. 

 

Also, if someone else's boat sinks, it doesn't automatically become the property of whoever raises it. There would have to be a barter to begin with to exchange the title. 

Expand  

 

Probably in it's perm resting place.  Final Destination 2020.

Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 5:40 PM, dubs said:

it’s clear the intention is to clutter the board with nonsense to the point where it’s so frustrating people disengage on the board. 

Expand  

 

This is standard fare posting for leftists right now. They know Biden is a spoonful of tapioca away from dementia, and they know Kamala Harris makes the Sarah Palin pick look genius.

 

So all they do is mock Trump supporters, share anonymous stories that are easily debunked and, amazingly, still push the Russia hoax. Some will say some unbelievably disgusting things about your wife.

 

They're a schittshow right now, and the only real problem is when you put someone on ignore, it doesn't hide the threads they start.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 6
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 5:50 PM, IDBillzFan said:

 

This is standard fare posting for leftists right now. They know Biden is a spoonful of tapioca away from dementia, and they know Kamala Harris makes the Sarah Palin pick look genius.

 

So all they do is mock Trump supporters, share anonymous stories that are easily debunked and, amazingly, still push the Russia hoax. Some will say some unbelievably disgusting things about your wife.

 

They're a schittshow right now, and the only real problem is when you put someone on ignore, it doesn't hide the threads they start.

 

 

Expand  

 

I’m going to Rule #2 this.  Show your work.  Thank you. 

  On 9/8/2020 at 5:49 PM, Unforgiven said:

Just more stupidity.

Bye Bye you jackass.

 

You've chosen to ignore content by wAcKy ZeBrA.

Expand  

 

That is a Rule #1 violation.  But I forgive you.  Which means that you may now have to change your name. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 5:06 PM, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

Please follow rule #2 and engage in an actual discussion of the topic.

 

These boaters for Trump are morons and put a lot of people in a dangerous situation.

 

 

Expand  

 

Didn't they put themselves in a dangerous situation?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 8:57 PM, IDBillzFan said:

 

Once again...we see the choice clearly.

 

Like the police? Vote for Trump.

 

Hate the police? Vote for Harris-Biden.

 

It's just that simple.

Expand  

If I hate police I vote for the cop and the guy that supports strong police? The math doesn't check out.

Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 9:00 PM, BullBuchanan said:

If I hate police I vote for the cop and the guy that supports strong police? The math doesn't check out.

Expand  


In her 2009 book, “Smart on Crime,” she wrote that “if we take a show of hands of those who would like to see more police officers on the street, mine would shoot up,” adding that “virtually all law-abiding citizens feel safer when they see officers walking a beat.”

 

Earlier this summer, in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, she told The New York Times that “it is status-quo thinking to believe that putting more police on the streets creates more safety. That’s wrong. It’s just wrong.”

 

 

guess you forgot to carry the “1”...

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 9:07 PM, DFT said:


In her 2009 book, “Smart on Crime,” she wrote that “if we take a show of hands of those who would like to see more police officers on the street, mine would shoot up,” adding that “virtually all law-abiding citizens feel safer when they see officers walking a beat.”

 

Earlier this summer, in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, she told The New York Times that “it is status-quo thinking to believe that putting more police on the streets creates more safety. That’s wrong. It’s just wrong.”

 

 

guess you forgot to carry the “1”...

Expand  

Actions speak louder than words, mate. 

×
×
  • Create New...