Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, GG said:

 

I did.   Read the proper thread. 

 

Lazy liar

 

Which is the proper thread?  Perhaps if you would simply honor your Rule #2 responsibilities we wouldn’t have this problem.  Sir. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Also, to the best of my recollection, you have several Rule #2 requests outstanding from this morning.  Perhaps it is that you, sir, are the one in violation of Rule #1 here.  

 

 

 

As do you. 

Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

Which is the proper thread?  Perhaps if you would simply honor your Rule #2 responsibilities we wouldn’t have this problem.  Sir. 

 

If you weren't a disingenuous lazy liar, you could find it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

I found it but 5Gs numbers do not jive with the abstract of the study.

 

Because the abstract ignored the totality of the cases in the US and hypothetically extrapolated their modeled numbers, which do not correlate to the actual reported case trends.   Sturgis probably contributed to 7k-10k additional cases, which is nowhere near 250k or $12.5 billion in costs, since the vast majority of infected people are asymptomatic who do not require any medical intervention.  

Posted
13 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Because the abstract ignored the totality of the cases in the US and hypothetically extrapolated their modeled numbers, which do not correlate to the actual reported case trends.   Sturgis probably contributed to 7k-10k additional cases, which is nowhere near 250k or $12.5 billion in costs, since the vast majority of infected people are asymptomatic who do not require any medical intervention.  

 

Rule #2.  Again.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Rule #2.  Again.  

 

Not my problem you can't add & subtract.

Posted
8 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Not my problem you can't add & subtract.

 

Hoax.  

 

6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Have you noticed, everything about 3rd Chair is #2? 

 Rule #1.  Not classy. 

Posted
5 hours ago, GG said:

 

Is that why the true alt-right posters were banished?


In a child’s mind, everything they disagree with is their boogeyman.

 

Can you imagine having a mind so ghettoized that it reported that the philosophy of classical liberalism (which the majority of the “louder” voices adhere to, by and large) was synonymous with the alt-right?

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 9/4/2020 at 3:23 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

The Dungeon has long carried with it a comedically poor reputation among the other boards on TBD. Compared to the rest of the site, it's the Wild West, with a long standing tradition of self-modding and handling any disputes/spats in-house rather than letting it bleed over and contaminate the rest of the boards. This is because PPP was largely populated by adults, capable of having a conversation with someone else who did not share every single opinion they did. But as the political discourse in the country has become more divisive and explosive over the past 15+ years -- ramping up to new levels over the past 4 -- PPP has become even more of a tinderbox and now we find ourselves at a crossroad... 

 

 

I tried to report someone for totally changing a quote.  Which it completely against the ToS
 

I was told to not waste the mods time. 
 

maybe the mod was just being an ass. 
it’s happened before 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

 

 

I tried to report someone for totally changing a quote.  Which it completely against the ToS
 

I was told to not waste the mods time. 
 

maybe the mod was just being an ass. 
it’s happened before 


Clinesmith already plead guilty.  That’s not a mod issue.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...