Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 9/7/2020 at 10:42 PM, Azalin said:

 

Some people just can't abide others enjoying something of which they do not approve. 

Expand  


 

Exactly.  Just don’t read threads that don’t interest you.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
  On 9/7/2020 at 7:57 PM, Crayola64 said:


Yes!  I know he mainly spams against other trolls, but 99% of his posts are textbook spam in my opinion.  

Expand  

So you agree the large majority of trolls and spammers are liberals? 

  On 9/7/2020 at 8:25 PM, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Nice ad hominem.

 

Another consistent problem over here.

 

To clear things up because I think it's so ingrained in the psyche over here that what I said just flew over your head:

 

You talk about conspiracy theories like flavors of ice cream. Q is "not my cup of tea," you say. You're "not interested."

 

Why not just call it the crazy, debunked conspiracy theory it is and has proven to be?

 

Instead, you talk about it as though you're shopping around for a car and that Q conspiracy theory is "not my cup of tea," but you'll find another one.

 

And before you get all bent out of shape, I'm just trying to help you understand what you were reading there since you didn't actually understand what I wrote in the context of that particular post by you.

Expand  

Says the guy who still believes in the Russian hoax. Maybe you should take your own advice?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/7/2020 at 11:04 PM, BillStime said:

 

 

👇Truth


image.thumb.jpeg.3ac3fb3927392e24a5f0d03c31df89a6.jpeg

Expand  


So . . . . . 
 

taking a picture of people saying the Pledge of Allegiance

 

combine it with an unfounded open ended statement  

 

and that’s supposed to make some sort of point ?

 

 

oh wait, it does. . . . . . about you 😂

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 12:24 AM, B-Man said:


So . . . . . 
 

taking a picture of people saying the Pledge of Allegiance

 

combine it with an unfounded open ended statement  

 

and that’s supposed to make some sort of point ?

 

 

oh wait, it does. . . . . . about you 😂

 

 

 

Expand  

This thread was about how to deal with a BillSimme type, and it was I thought agreed the best way was NOT to reply. Reply to one and get another hundred.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 12:33 AM, Niagara said:

This thread was about how to deal with a BillSimme type, and it was I thought agreed the best way was NOT to reply. Reply to one and get another hundred.

Expand  


Fair enough. 
 

 

Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 12:24 AM, B-Man said:


So . . . . . 
 

taking a picture of people saying the Pledge of Allegiance

 

combine it with an unfounded open ended statement  

 

and that’s supposed to make some sort of point ?

 

 

oh wait, it does. . . . . . about you 😂

 

 

 

Expand  

Actually, only current and past members of the military salute during the national anthem.  Civilians are expected to remove their hats and place their hand on their heart.

 

So the poster is insulting veterans and the National Anthem.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/7/2020 at 10:13 PM, Joe in Winslow said:

 

I'm sorry, did I miss the part where someone pistol whipped you and forced you to come here? If so, damn.

Expand  

 

Nope. We're talking about the merits of PPP. I weighed in that it's a stain on the entirety of this site. 

 

You think it's a positive and uplifting place. We differ. 

  On 9/7/2020 at 11:54 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Discussing current events is now an agenda? That's a new one. 

 

What specific agenda was being pushed? Show your work. 

Expand  

 

Yeah, you have no agenda. That's at least good for a laugh, thank you. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 9/7/2020 at 8:25 PM, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Nice ad hominem.

 

Another consistent problem over here.

 

To clear things up because I think it's so ingrained in the psyche over here that what I said just flew over your head:

 

You talk about conspiracy theories like flavors of ice cream. Q is "not my cup of tea," you say. You're "not interested."

 

Why not just call it the crazy, debunked conspiracy theory it is and has proven to be?

 

Instead, you talk about it as though you're shopping around for a car and that Q conspiracy theory is "not my cup of tea," but you'll find another one.

 

And before you get all bent out of shape, I'm just trying to help you understand what you were reading there since you didn't actually understand what I wrote in the context of that particular post by you.

Expand  

For a teacher, your language skills really suk. Before you can explain something, you first must be able to properly verbalize. Poor students. Who begins a sentence "To clear things up because..."? Its laughable.

Edited by Niagara
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 1:05 AM, shoshin said:

 

Nope. We're talking about the merits of PPP. I weighed in that it's a stain on the entirety of this site. 

 

You think it's a positive and uplifting place. We differ. 

 

Expand  

Yet, here you are. Contributing to the "stain". Why don't you take your holier than though crap and leave. That action alone will greatly improve PPP.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 1:17 AM, westside2 said:

Yet, here you are. Contributing to the "stain". Why don't you take your holier than though crap and leave. That action alone will greatly improve PPP.

Expand  

When all is lost yell, call names, burn and destroy things, or call  it a "stain".  They are a blight.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 12:33 AM, Niagara said:

This thread was about how to deal with a BillSimme type, and it was I thought agreed the best way was NOT to reply. Reply to one and get another hundred.

Expand  

Nothing has been agreed to yet. If we are going to be successful with the "shunning" approach we need a more formal mechanism. If we go that route we should also probably get SDS's approval. I'm talking about something like a 3 person panel of known fair and reasonable posters that can make a determination for a voluntary shun that would be recommended to all posters. Anyone else have any ideas?

Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 1:54 AM, 3rdnlng said:

Nothing has been agreed to yet. If we are going to be successful with the "shunning" approach we need a more formal mechanism. If we go that route we should also probably get SDS's approval. I'm talking about something like a 3 person panel of known fair and reasonable posters that can make a determination for a voluntary shun that would be recommended to all posters. Anyone else have any ideas?

Expand  


1. Use the ignore function.
2.  If you choose not to use the ignore function, do not engage.

That is all. 🙂

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/8/2020 at 1:59 AM, 3rdnlng said:

Except that hasn't worked very well in the past.

Expand  


Because “I know what you are, but what am I?” discourse does not further the discussion. Honestly? The trolls are not solely to blame. Their schtick only works with a participating audience. No audience? No participation? They either get bored and go away, or talk to themselves. 
 

It also takes about 12 seconds to identify a sock puppet. We are not dealing with the masters of disguise. Again, ignore function.

 

Is it tedious? Yes. Will it make for a better sub-forum? Hopefully.

 

Note that I say trolls. I do not mean people on the other side of the political aisle who do engage in substantive arguments. Listening, engaging, and discussing both sides of any argument makes for great debate.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...