RocCityRoller Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 so 11 pages in who was cut? I could see Robert Foster to GB and thriving.
fansince88 Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 11 hours ago, IDBillzFan said: Will Fromm be an early cut? Hmmmmmm.
umangatan Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 5 hours ago, njbuff said: I guess DiMarco's damning pics of McDermott have worn out its welcome. did i miss something, lol?
H2o Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 10 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said: so 11 pages in who was cut? I could see Robert Foster to GB and thriving. Yes, because Rodgers just loves fast WR's who are bad route runners and terrible tracking the ball in the air.
njbuff Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 3 minutes ago, umang_a_desai said: did i miss something, lol? You can figure out what I mean.
umangatan Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 4 hours ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said: How is that a classy move? True he gets paid, but I'd be willing to bet if DeMarco could still play this year, he'd have rather been cut than placed on IR where now he sits out an entire year. He plays a position that not too many teams even use, so sitting out a full year won't help his career too much. Wouldn't be shocked to see him released with an injury settlement. Gilliam is more versatile and we know McD loves versatility. He is more of an H back TE/FB hybrid. Keeps defenses on their toes and makes sense to move on from DiMarco who is more one demesional as a FB.
JoshAllenHasBigHands Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 3 minutes ago, umang_a_desai said: Gilliam is more versatile and we know McD loves versatility. He is more of an H back TE/FB hybrid. Keeps defenses on their toes and makes sense to move on from DiMarco who is more one demesional as a FB. TE/FB hybrids are just TEs that are too small to be a matchup problem, but are also not good lead blockers like a FB. They are almost always useless.
atlbillsfan1975 Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 18 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said: so 11 pages in who was cut? I could see Robert Foster to GB and thriving. I honestly think it might take Foster getting cut for the light to go on if it can. I say this solely based of his rookie year after he was sat for awhile and how he played afterwards. I think Foster has a ton of talent, it baffles me why he can’t put it together. 1
RocCityRoller Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 1 minute ago, H2o said: Yes, because Rodgers just loves fast WR's who are bad route runners and terrible tracking the ball in the air. SF/GB/Philly all make sense. Their off season moves all bombed out due to injury or questionable draft day decisions. Say what you want about Foster, he has a 6 game stretch of tape that looks really good on a bad offense. And he has some speed. As John Madden used to say, 'Speed Kills'. Buffalo has J Brown and S Diggs, plenty of speed. Davante Adams is clearly WR1 in GB (says something about GB WR,) Would you rather have M. Valdez Scantling, Allen Lazard, or Geronimo Allison as your #2? Lazard and Allison failed to get separation. They are slow. MVS has been all name and no production. Foster is at worst WR #3 on that team today, and maybe #2 on physical ability alone.
Sherlock Holmes Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 6 hours ago, eball said: Just stop. When an AP beat writer stops by, the last thing you do is what you idiots are doing. Just think what these savages would do to Chris Brown right now 1
RocCityRoller Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 1 minute ago, atlbillsfan1975 said: I honestly think it might take Foster getting cut for the light to go on if it can. I say this solely based of his rookie year after he was sat for awhile and how he played afterwards. I think Foster has a ton of talent, it baffles me why he can’t put it together. Me too. He has the size, speed, hands combo you want in a WR 2 or WR3. We have the LUXURY of Diggs, Brown and Beasley. I don't think Foster has the complicated E-Perkins system down. Put him in a more simple offense or with a more established QB and watch fireworks. We are at the point Bills nation where good players, who do not fit the system, or culture may be let go. 1
Agent 91 Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 4 hours ago, TheProcess said: Kind of a pet peeve of mine too. Even though either is acceptable, I prefer “with regard to” over “in regard to”. I think I was taught that way in an English class I took and it stuck. 🤷♂️ Damn. Thanks, I make that mistake too. I feel dumb
Sherlock Holmes Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 3 hours ago, ScottLaw said: Not an outside LB. Gross. TJ Watt says hello...
Blank Stare Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 4 minutes ago, Agent 91 said: Damn. Thanks, I make that mistake too. I feel dumb All good dude! Just something that stuck with me from class many many years ago. Believe me, I’m no expert. Far be it from me to lecture anyone on grammar. 1
That's No Moon Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 18 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said: SF/GB/Philly all make sense. Their off season moves all bombed out due to injury or questionable draft day decisions. Say what you want about Foster, he has a 6 game stretch of tape that looks really good on a bad offense. And he has some speed. As John Madden used to say, 'Speed Kills'. Buffalo has J Brown and S Diggs, plenty of speed. Davante Adams is clearly WR1 in GB (says something about GB WR,) Would you rather have M. Valdez Scantling, Allen Lazard, or Geronimo Allison as your #2? Lazard and Allison failed to get separation. They are slow. MVS has been all name and no production. Foster is at worst WR #3 on that team today, and maybe #2 on physical ability alone. Equanimeous St. Brown
Ethan in Cleveland Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 22 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said: TE/FB hybrids are just TEs that are too small to be a matchup problem, but are also not good lead blockers like a FB. They are almost always useless. FBs are slow running backs that are always useless. 1
Sherlock Holmes Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 24 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said: TE/FB hybrids are just TEs that are too small to be a matchup problem, but are also not good lead blockers like a FB. They are almost always useless. 2 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said: FBs are slow running backs that are always useless. Kyle Juszczyk says hello
JoshAllenHasBigHands Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 1 minute ago, Ethan in Portland said: FBs are slow running backs that are always useless. There are strategic benefits to running 21 personnel. Just ask the Pats or the 49ers. Just now, Sherlock Holmes said: Kyle Juszczyk says hello You think he is a hybrid? I always considered him a true FB. 1
Sherlock Holmes Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 1 minute ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said: There are strategic benefits to running 21 personnel. Just ask the Pats or the 49ers. You think he is a hybrid? I always considered him a true FB. True FB maybe, with great hands, always a danger to break a big gain because he escaped notice. H Back type is more how I see him, he is a swiss army knife/utility player for sure, definitely not useless, would love to have him!
Straight Hucklebuck Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 4 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said: FBs are slow running backs that are always useless. For the most part I agree. You have Vonta Leach, that’s a different story. But Kyle Williams would have been a better fullback that Pat DiMarco. When he’s on the field it means that someone more explosive is sitting on the bench. The guys that Buffalo has are bottom of the barrel, fringe NFL, borderline good enough, try-hard, lunch pail types. 1
Recommended Posts