Buffalo_Gal Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 40 minutes ago, Doc said: No one said brain damage. Just that she was falling all over the place. Probably exhaustion. Tapper said she was "stumbling" when he really meant "collapsed and was thrown into the van like a side of beef." 1 1 1
Q-baby! Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Tapper said she was "stumbling" when he really meant "collapsed and was thrown into the van like a side of beef." BBH! 14 minutes ago, Doc said: I'm not talking filling Depends. 🙄
keepthefaith Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Just like how Hillary had brain damage 4 years ago. The same old playbook. Hillary suffered brain damage much longer ago. Probably in college as soon as she moved away from her really solid parents. And then there is this beauty. Edited September 14, 2020 by keepthefaith
US Egg Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Tapper said she was "stumbling" when he really meant "collapsed and was thrown into the van like a side of beef." The cement post is what's keeping Hillary upright as she's losing consciousness. Hunter's stuff was too strong for her. Edited September 14, 2020 by I am the egg man
Niagara Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: But that's not what you said. You didn't say she is trying to capitalize on her bi-racial heritage. You specifically called her an angry black woman. That simply doesn't fit her personality. I don't recall her ever raising her voice or expressing anger. Even when she went after Biden on school busing it was more in the manner of "you were mistaken." I would not have called you out if we were talking about Maxine Waters. But that's a whole different person with an entirely different personality. You are not worthy of discourse. You insulted me because in your opinion you can not recall her showing anger by raising her voice. What a jerk. No, it was all an act. By your standard voice level denotes anger level. When out of argument call the opponent a racist. I am disappointed in you
The Frankish Reich Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Niagara said: You are not worthy of discourse. You insulted me because in your opinion you can not recall her showing anger by raising her voice. What a jerk. No, it was all an act. By your standard voice level denotes anger level. When out of argument call the opponent a racist. I am disappointed in you The reference to "black" was gratuitous. What purpose did it serve in your criticism of Harris other than to call attention to her race? Your explanation that it had something to do with her leveraging her racial heritage for political gain was not related to your statement that Biden is some kind of stalking horse for an "angry black woman."
Niagara Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: The reference to "black" was gratuitous. What purpose did it serve in your criticism of Harris other than to call attention to her race? Your explanation that it had something to do with her leveraging her racial heritage for political gain was not related to your statement that Biden is some kind of stalking horse for an "angry black woman." I am done with you POS.
The Frankish Reich Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, Niagara said: I am done with you POS. You haven't given me any explanation for why you would raise someone's race. I am not a fan of Mike Pence's political positions. I would never refer to him as an "angry white man." It doesn't fit his public persona.
Doc Brown Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 Can't wait for them. I'm still trying to figure out who these relative unknowns are all about.
Westside Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 Because Democrats never bring up race when it comes to angry old white men. It happens on both sides. Stop acting like your holier than thou.
Keukasmallies Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 3 hours ago, westside2 said: Because Democrats never bring up race when it comes to angry old white men. It happens on both sides. Stop acting like your holier than thou. Yeah, and Joe Biden doesn't suffer dementia!
SoCal Deek Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 9 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: You haven't given me any explanation for why you would raise someone's race. I am not a fan of Mike Pence's political positions. I would never refer to him as an "angry white man." It doesn't fit his public persona. What? Kamala was selected BECAUSE she was a “woman of color”! EVERY post about her should bring up her race. It’s her lone claim to the office she‘s seeking. 4
Niagara Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 37 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: What? Kamala was selected BECAUSE she was a “woman of color”! EVERY post about her should bring up her race. It’s her lone claim to the office she‘s seeking. Ah, but is she an angry “woman of color”. Either way, reference to her is "gratuitous" and doesn't fit a public persona. In any event it is insulting, and a show stopper. Big words, little minds. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Niagara said: Ah, but is she an angry “woman of color”. Either way, reference to her is "gratuitous" and doesn't fit a public persona. In any event it is insulting, and a show stopper. Big words, little minds. Keep trying ... Sometimes it's best to just admit that it was a mistake to go there.
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Keep trying ... Sometimes it's best to just admit that it was a mistake to go there. Kamala Harris was picked for a number of reasons, one of which is she fit the female POC suit (the other was some backroom fighting between the Obama and Clinton camps). She got her start by being Willie Brown's mistress. At the time, very little happened in the California Democratic party that was not sanctioned by Willie Brown. She was a DA that was especially harsh and cruel to black men. She has now changed her positions based not on ideology, but on donations from her sponsors. She is also extremely unlikable. Edited September 14, 2020 by Buffalo_Gal 3
The Frankish Reich Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 7 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Kamala Harris was picked for a number of reasons, one of which is she fit the female POC suit (the other was some backroom fighting between the Obama and Clinton camps). She got her start by being Willie Brown's mistress. At the time, very little happened in the California Democratic party that was not sanctioned by Willie Brown. She was a DA that was especially harsh and cruel to black men. She has now changed her positions based not on ideology, but on donations from her sponsors. She is also extremely unlikable. I have never been a Kamala Harris fan. She is an opportunist, and you are correct - she parlayed a relationship with Willie Brown (a deeply corrupt figure) into a political career. And obviously her gender (admittedly) and ethnicity (not officially admitted, but c'mon) were pivotal in Biden's decision to select her. But: I am not arguing about those things. I am arguing with one particular comment here that said this: - Biden is incapable of serving (certainly not more than one term) as president - the plan is then to hand over the government to an angry black woman Tell me what legitimate purpose "black" (or for that matter, "woman") serves in that comment? The answer is "none."
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said: I have never been a Kamala Harris fan. She is an opportunist, and you are correct - she parlayed a relationship with Willie Brown (a deeply corrupt figure) into a political career. And obviously her gender (admittedly) and ethnicity (not officially admitted, but c'mon) were pivotal in Biden's decision to select her. But: I am not arguing about those things. I am arguing with one particular comment here that said this: - Biden is incapable of serving (certainly not more than one term) as president - the plan is then to hand over the government to an angry black woman Tell me what legitimate purpose "black" (or for that matter, "woman") serves in that comment? The answer is "none." Does she identify as black?
Alaska Darin Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Does she identify as black? Only when votes are at stake. 2 1
meazza Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 https://www.mediaite.com/election-2020/trump-says-hes-down-to-participate-in-a-4-hour-debate-with-biden-on-joe-rogans-podcast/ 1 2
The Frankish Reich Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 26 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Does she identify as black? Why would that make it legitimate? You are saying (I think) that this would make the comment accurate as a matter of fact. I am saying that in the poster's original context "black" adds nothing in the form of legitimate argument, such that we have to question why anyone would include it. I am not one to cry "racism" every time someone's race is noted. If we are talking like pundits (and this board is ostensibly about punditry) it's fine to discuss why a candidate of one race or another is in a better situation to win or lose. But that's different, and I think you are intelligent and can see that.
Recommended Posts