Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Coach Tuesday said:


Well that’s not true either.  Granted we are now in the land of hypotheticals but if he was grabbing a knife while engaged with the cops then almost any jury is going to find that lethal force was justified.  We cannot live in a society where a perp can grab a weapon while engaged with police and they have to ask politely for him to put it down.  OTOH we have yet to hear definitively that he grabbed his knife and if that had happened you’d expect that to be the first thing to be pointed to in defense of what happened.

Im sorry, we just cant possibly live like the rest of the first world that doesn't murder people? Why not?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:


Well that’s not true either.  Granted we are now in the land of hypotheticals but if he was grabbing a knife while engaged with the cops then almost any jury is going to find that lethal force was justified.  We cannot live in a society where a perp can grab a weapon while engaged with police and they have to ask politely for him to put it down.  OTOH we have yet to hear definitively that he grabbed his knife and if that had happened you’d expect that to be the first thing to be pointed to in defense of what happened.

He wasnt engaged with police.....he had just walked away from police that couldnt take him down and had his back turned and there was distance between them.......

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

You should do some actual research beyond reading headlines. The first guy he shot was chasing after him and threw something at him when someone fired a handgun at the kid. Thats when he turned around, was the first guy coming right at him, and shot him.

The breakdown starts at 2:24.

Cue the YouTube "research".lol

Edited by BullBuchanan
Posted
1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

As a Air Force Intel I worked with security police all damn day long.....I also worked for a private security company where I worked alongside police offiers

 

I know the drill.......and if your a cop I severely question your judgement

If that guy attacked a family member of yours the way he attacked the victim, I'm pretty sure seven bullets wouldn't be enough. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Or you could defend the undefensible......I will wait

Got it...you cant defend it so your out.....typical

I don’t play tackle football with toddlers, this would be just as uneven. I honestly wish you the best dude 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, BillsSB2020KO said:

I don’t play tackle football with toddlers, this would be just as uneven. I honestly wish you the best dude 


But you don’t wish him the best. Stop saying things you don’t mean.  It’s not making you sound any less batschidt.

Posted
Just now, BillsSB2020KO said:

I don’t play tackle football with toddlers, this would be just as uneven. I honestly wish you the best dude 

Your not even capable of playing Jr. football here......your just spewing bull####....prove your point or dont.....everyone knows what your about

Posted
6 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

You should do some actual research beyond reading headlines. The first guy he shot was chasing after him and threw something at him when someone else fired a handgun at the kid. Thats when he turned around, saw the first guy coming right at him, and shot him.

The breakdown starts at 2:24.

Was that before or after a 17 year-old drove to another state with an assault rifle to avoid trouble? 

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

 

That's the job. You can't handle it without murdering people, because you're scared, don't sign up.

Unlike being black you can quit at any time, or never sign up to begin with. It's a pretty easy decision.

Edited by BullBuchanan
Posted
1 minute ago, BullBuchanan said:

Systemic racism is not dependent on the opinions of the populace but rather the machinations of the system.

 

I'm sorry Bull but that sounds like a bunch of social-babble.  I just want to know how you can measure "racism" and arrive at a 30% racist metric.  What is the criteria for determining that someone is a racist?  My contention is everyone's using some "eye of the beholder" subjective observation.  My personal definition of racism is somebody that acts to violate the rights of another person based solely on their race.  In my view its not words or thought but actions that matter.  I don't care about regulating or programming people to think and speak in a specific way to all "play nice" or forcing people to like each other.  I just want everyone to respect everyone's rights and treat everyone fairly and in an unbiased way without consideration of race.  I don't think there is any metric or measure that proves there are a majority of Americans, or a systemic number of Americans, that are going about their lives acting in a racial biased way against others. 

Sure there are acts of bias and racism.  There is no question about that and it is wrong.  But if its .1% of the population and even 1% that is not be any measure a "systemic" percentage of the population.  None of the parties pushing the Systemic narrative can produce any hard data or evidence because it is simply their personal belief rather than some statistically valid and data driven fact.

Posted
3 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

They didn’t mention anyone in particular. The words “end racism” that they plan to incorporate is what triggered you. Think about that, “end racism” triggered you!! ??‍♂️

I don’t think you understand his point. He was pointing out that “racism” only seems to go one way in the “woke” world. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...