Dragoon Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 Are democrats dumb enough to still put stock in polls?
Hedge Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 2 hours ago, Dragoon said: Are democrats dumb enough to still put stock in polls? Yes. And I stopped reading after 5 words. 4
Tiberius Posted September 21, 2020 Author Posted September 21, 2020 North Carolina: Trump vs. Biden Emerson Biden 50, Trump 49 Biden +1 Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail. Without it, nothing can succeed. Abraham Lincoln 1
Tiberius Posted September 21, 2020 Author Posted September 21, 2020 16 hours ago, Dragoon said: Are democrats dumb enough to still put stock in polls? And don’t forget the scientists, doctors and experts are all wrong to about everything. Only the Know Nothing party of Trump is to be listened to
Unforgiven Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. Answer: how many times he has responded to his own post
Dragoon Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: And don’t forget the scientists, doctors and experts are all wrong to about everything. Only the Know Nothing party of Trump is to be listened to Hmm...take it you're not a fan of Mr. Trump? Gotcha. But I was just talking polls. Not science stuff. That's a wormhole I don't wanna go down.
Tiberius Posted September 21, 2020 Author Posted September 21, 2020 2 minutes ago, Dragoon said: Hmm...take it you're not a fan of Mr. Trump? Gotcha. But I was just talking polls. Not science stuff. That's a wormhole I don't wanna go down. Polls have Trump way behind. And excuse me for noticing patterns, but Trump supporters are usually the ones challenging any and everything that goes against their reality. Science, polls, medicine, video evidence that is utterly irrefutable. You believe Trump sexually assaulted women?
B-Man Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 Wargaming the Electoral College: 5 Scenarios, 3 Startling Finishes. Four years ago this month, my first and wildest Wargaming the Electoral College scenario in which Donald Trump won, was what I called the “northern route” to a Trump victory through the Rust Belt states. As it turned out, that’s exactly how Trump did win. It was a close-run thing, and if the state polls are anything to go by then it’s going to be even tougher for Trump to pull off a second time. But I don’t buy it. It isn’t that the polls are necessarily wrong, it’s just that the electorate is going to be much more fluid in a crazy year like 2020. More than figuring out who people are going to vote for, pollsters have to figure out who is actually going to show up and vote. I’m not sure anyone has any clue how to determine who the Likely Voters are in a year like 2020. If I were a pollster, I’d be bald from all the hair-pulling. That said, we have to start somewhere, so let’s begin as we do every four years with the RealClearPolitics poll averages. Much more at the link. 1 1
The Frankish Reich Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 9 hours ago, Unforgiven said: You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. Answer: how many times he has responded to his own post Q. Are you ignoring someone when you respond to them? Perhaps I've misunderstood the meaning of "ignore" 1
Chef Jim Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 14 hours ago, Tiberius said: North Carolina: Trump vs. Biden Emerson Biden 50, Trump 49 Biden +1 Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail. Without it, nothing can succeed. Abraham Lincoln via LinkedIn Huh.
Tiberius Posted September 22, 2020 Author Posted September 22, 2020 Iowa: Trump vs. Biden Des Moines Register Trump 47, Biden 47 Tie Michigan: Trump vs. Biden MRG Biden 46, Trump 41 Biden +5 Georgia: Trump vs. Biden Univ. of Georgia* Trump 47, Biden 47 Tie Vermont: Trump vs. Biden Vermont Public Radio Biden 56, Trump 32 Biden +24 Michigan Senate - James vs. Peters MRG Peters 42, James 40 Peters +2 Georgia Senate - Perdue vs. Ossoff Univ. of Georgia* Perdue 47, Ossoff 45 Perdue +2 Georgia Senate Special Election - Open Primary Univ. of Georgia Loeffler 24, Collins 21, Warnock 20, Lieberman 11, Tarver 5, Slowinski 3 Loeffler +3 12 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Q. Are you ignoring someone when you respond to them? Perhaps I've misunderstood the meaning of "ignore" Not sure what the point of that posters post is. Or why he posts at all.
B-Man Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 Trump Will Win Pennsylvania and Here is Why 1
Tiberius Posted September 22, 2020 Author Posted September 22, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Trump Will Win Pennsylvania and Here is Why You sound like DR in 2016 proclaiming boldly that Hillary has in down, no doubt she will win 😆 Trump trial8ng in PA as abides nears the 50% mark https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/pennsylvania/
B-Man Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You obviously answered without reading the article you were replying to. No surprise.
Tiberius Posted September 22, 2020 Author Posted September 22, 2020 17 minutes ago, B-Man said: You obviously answered without reading the article you were replying to. No surprise. Ok, I'll read
Tiberius Posted September 22, 2020 Author Posted September 22, 2020 23 minutes ago, B-Man said: You obviously answered without reading the article you were replying to. No surprise. Ok, so I read this thing and he's claiming all these new GOP voters, even though there are many more Dems in Pa, whatever But the funny thing about the article, is he discusses a Republican poll with Biden leading and says that poll is wrong, lol. Its a feel good piece to give you lemmings hope
B-Man Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 Sorry B-Gal 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Ok, so I read this thing and he's claiming all these new GOP voters, even though there are many more Dems in Pa, whatever I realize logic is difficult for you. Trump won Pennsylvania in 2016 ..............with PA having "more" democrats. and now............There are even more republicans registered. Thus..............Trump Will Win Pennsylvania and Here is Why 1
Tiberius Posted September 22, 2020 Author Posted September 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: Sorry B-Gal I realize logic is difficult for you. Trump won Pennsylvania in 2016 ..............with PA having "more" democrats. and now............There are even more republicans registered. Thus..............Trump Will Win Pennsylvania and Here is Why Math too hard for you? As previously stated, 2016 figures showed Dems with 4,172,826 voters. Figures available September 7th, show the state’s Democrats have just 4,125,889 voters, a loss of nearly 47,000 voters. Republicans, on the other hand, ended 2016 with 3,280,202 voters but showed 3,376,463 voters on September 7th.
3rdnlng Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Math too hard for you? As previously stated, 2016 figures showed Dems with 4,172,826 voters. Figures available September 7th, show the state’s Democrats have just 4,125,889 voters, a loss of nearly 47,000 voters. Republicans, on the other hand, ended 2016 with 3,280,202 voters but showed 3,376,463 voters on September 7th. With this logic Trump must have lost PA in 2016 by a large margin. Even after all these years of your posting, it never fails to amaze me just how ***** stupid you are. 2
Tiberius Posted September 22, 2020 Author Posted September 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: With this logic Trump must have lost PA in 2016 by a large margin. Even after all these years of your posting, it never fails to amaze me just how ***** stupid you are. Throw an insult because you know I’m right. And that stupid article was from one of your propagandists. 1
Recommended Posts