DCOrange Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 1 minute ago, snafu said: It may not be that difficult. The Supreme Court put out one decision prior to the election. — Wisconsin wasn’t allowed to count ballots received after election day — They declined to hear the same issue for PA, but it is still an open case in front of SC. So so if the Court comes back and says that PA can’t count late ballots then that changes things. I’m not sure what the GA, NC, NV, AZ rules are regarding counting ballots received after Election Day. But the point is that Trump wouldn’t have to change votes. Not allowed to count votes received after election day maybe. Biden doesn't need any of those.
DrDawkinstein Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 1 minute ago, DCOrange said: I think that's premature.
HappyDays Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Big Gun said: Only if you believe there was no ballot fraud in Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, etc The fraud is so vast, it will be exposed and Biden will not be in the WH Literally everything you posted in the thread earlier was proven wrong. Nice of you to show up again. 306 is what Trump won with in 2016. 1
aristocrat Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, SoTier said: This isn't 1986 or 1994. Times change. People change as well. again, the effects are still being felt from those bills. it's not like they just had an effect on those years. the dems just spent four years labeling trump bad for minorities and turned hypocrites by electing a guy who has a far worse history on minorities. you want to vote for a democrat...all for it. but don't label the right racists or bad for minorities when you go and put this guy in office. Edited November 6, 2020 by aristocrat
DCOrange Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 4 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said: I think that's premature. It's really not. All he needed was Pennsylvania and the lead will only continue to grow at this point.
nkreed Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, snafu said: It may not be that difficult. The Supreme Court put out one decision prior to the election. — Wisconsin wasn’t allowed to count ballots received after election day — They declined to hear the same issue for PA, but it is still an open case in front of SC. So so if the Court comes back and says that PA can’t count late ballots then that changes things. I’m not sure what the GA, NC, NV, AZ rules are regarding counting ballots received after Election Day. But the point is that Trump wouldn’t have to change votes. In PA all of those "late ballots" have been sequestered and have not been counted at all. It doesn't change anything. There is a BIG difference between counting those that were received after Tuesday and counting days after the election. The conservative media has purposely been blurring these lines to make it seem like the ballots counted in PA right now have been received AFTER Tuesday. Edited November 6, 2020 by nkreed
DrDawkinstein Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 5 minutes ago, DCOrange said: It's really not. All he needed was Pennsylvania and the lead will only continue to grow at this point. And Im all for that. But as a Bills fan, I've learned to stay until the final whistle. 1
jkeerie Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 8 minutes ago, snafu said: It may not be that difficult. The Supreme Court put out one decision prior to the election. — Wisconsin wasn’t allowed to count ballots received after election day — They declined to hear the same issue for PA, but it is still an open case in front of SC. So so if the Court comes back and says that PA can’t count late ballots then that changes things. I’m not sure what the GA, NC, NV, AZ rules are regarding counting ballots received after Election Day. But the point is that Trump wouldn’t have to change votes. SCOTUS didn't want to change the election rules set up by the state legislatures...all Republican BTW. This was planned all along. Because of covid Dems would choose to vote by mail. Those votes would not be allowed to be counted until after election day so Trump would lead on election day. Now that those votes are being counted and Trump's lead is disappearing, he's claiming fraud. It's nonsense but he's betting his followers and the packed courts will buy it. Most aren't that naive. 1
SoTier Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 8 minutes ago, snafu said: It may not be that difficult. The Supreme Court put out one decision prior to the election. — Wisconsin wasn’t allowed to count ballots received after election day — They declined to hear the same issue for PA, but it is still an open case in front of SC. So so if the Court comes back and says that PA can’t count late ballots then that changes things. I’m not sure what the GA, NC, NV, AZ rules are regarding counting ballots received after Election Day. But the point is that Trump wouldn’t have to change votes. PA has segregated the votes that came in after Election Day. Those votes currently number only a few thousand. 1 2
snafu Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 20 minutes ago, DCOrange said: Not allowed to count votes received after election day maybe. Biden doesn't need any of those. Honestly, I don’t know. Im just waiting until the dust settles.
Bob in Mich Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 Wait, if Biden is ahead, shouldn’t the ballot counting be stopped immediately? Doesn't that sound nuts? It should if you are in favor of elections 2 1
DrDawkinstein Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Wait, if Biden is ahead, shouldn’t the ballot counting be stopped immediately? Doesn't that sound nuts? It should if you are in favor of elections The funny part is, Biden has been ahead the entire time Trump has called for counting to stop. His aides had to explain to him that if they called the election when he tweeted his demand, Biden would still win. Which shows Trump has no real complaint, he's just trying to stir chaos. Most anti-American President in history. 1 1 1
Tiberius Posted November 6, 2020 Author Posted November 6, 2020 Abraham Lincoln was elected president on this day 160 years ago ❤️ 4 1
aristocrat Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 18 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Abraham Lincoln was elected president on this day 160 years ago ❤️ congrats you elected a guy who had the direct opposite effect on minorites than lincoln. not exactly your proudest moment.
Q-baby! Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 1 minute ago, aristocrat said: congrats you elected a guy who had the direct opposite effect on minorites than lincoln. not exactly your proudest moment. Congrats to you too! 1 1
Big Gun Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, HeHateMe said: The slow painful vote counting leading to the demise of Trump this week has been something special.. I guess you and your friends are going to be real disappointed when 10's of thousands of Biden votes are deemed illegal and Trump goes back to the WH! Edited November 6, 2020 by Big Gun 1
WEATHER DOT COM Posted November 6, 2020 Posted November 6, 2020 Just now, Big Gun said: I guess you and your friends are going to be real disappointed when 10's of thousands of Biden votes are deemed illegal an Trump goes back to the WH! Did you take the grape or cherry kool-aid packet? 2
Recommended Posts