CapeBreton Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 20-32 are all interchangeable, those are some bad QBs at the bottom. I hope we never see Barkley on the field except for blowouts where he finishes the game, he is not good. 1
Mr. WEO Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 3 minutes ago, MJS said: Look at you guys just liking each other's posts! BFF's forever! I think you two are the only ones who feel this way. Beane and McDermott preach competition. It's going to be so tough for you guys this season to see the Bills win lots of games, isn't it? Whoa! No WAY!! Should you even be posting this?? What if other NFL coaches and GMs read this..... and then THEY start preaching competition as well?? Have you even thought of that? You are going to get banned by PSE now, bro. 2
MJS Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 1 minute ago, ScottLaw said: Yea I'm going to be so disappointed... Just keep your pitchfork sharpened and ready to go. A PSE janitor might quit soon.
billsfan89 Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 23rd seems about right, Barkley isn't a high end backup. He isn't completely tragic either but not the best. They clearly drafted Fromm to take over the position in a couple of years.
GunnerBill Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 2 hours ago, MJS said: Look at you guys just liking each other's posts! BFF's forever! I think you two are the only ones who feel this way. Beane and McDermott preach competition. It's going to be so tough for you guys this season to see the Bills win lots of games, isn't it? I agree with them on backup QB. They are right. 1
MJS Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 42 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: I agree with them on backup QB. They are right. They aren't capable of being right about it because there is no way to verify it. It is just as easily a fact that they are fine with Barkley as a backup and value him more than random message board fans. There's no indication that they think Barkley is bad and that they don't want to bring in a better QB because it will pressure Josh. That is just fan speculation. So no, they aren't right. And believing that is silly, in my opinion.
Doc Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, MJS said: They aren't capable of being right about it because there is no way to verify it. It is just as easily a fact that they are fine with Barkley as a backup and value him more than random message board fans. There's no indication that they think Barkley is bad and that they don't want to bring in a better QB because it will pressure Josh. That is just fan speculation. So no, they aren't right. And believing that is silly, in my opinion. None of those backups are a franchise player. The only one who could be is Winston, but that's if he cuts down on the turnovers, which is a big if. If Josh isn't the guy, I'd rather they start fresh.
BuffaninSarasota Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 4 hours ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said: 'An'? One of a few. ....one of many 1
Locomark Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 It’s mainly because he hasn’t touched the field much. So everybody doesn’t really know what he can do so they just assume the bad..Watch the NBC Simms video when they couldn’t even remember what game he got in last year.....
klos63 Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 Probably why we drafted a QB and have 4 in camp right now. He's got one year left on his deal. Good chance he won't be back if Fromm or Webb show much of anything.
GunnerBill Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 1 hour ago, MJS said: They aren't capable of being right about it because there is no way to verify it. It is just as easily a fact that they are fine with Barkley as a backup and value him more than random message board fans. There's no indication that they think Barkley is bad and that they don't want to bring in a better QB because it will pressure Josh. That is just fan speculation. So no, they aren't right. And believing that is silly, in my opinion. I don't care what they believe. They are wrong. Barkley is bad. Every single backup QB ranking has him lower than 20th.
MJS Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 Just now, GunnerBill said: I don't care what they believe. They are wrong. Barkley is bad. Every single backup QB ranking has him lower than 20th. Where do the QB rankings rank Josh Allen? Similarly low, but it is clear the team and most fans value him more than the outsiders.
GreggTX Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 Well, Josh Allen had the 24th highest Passing Efficiency Rating (100+ attempts) in the NFL last year, just behind Fitz and most posters think he's great. So I guess 23rd must qualify as elite.
GunnerBill Posted August 27, 2020 Posted August 27, 2020 51 minutes ago, MJS said: Where do the QB rankings rank Josh Allen? Similarly low, but it is clear the team and most fans value him more than the outsiders. Where I rate Josh has nothing to do with where I rate Matt.
Florida Bills Fanatic Posted August 28, 2020 Posted August 28, 2020 I'm not a Barkley fan but Geno Smith and Brett Hundley are grossly over rated on this list. Barkley is probably correctly placed in the bottom third. Some on the list haven't even played a down in the NFL and may someday prove to be a good player. Until they show it in real game situations, it is hard for me to accept that they should be in the top half of the league. For them, it's just a guess at this point.
1st Ammendment NoMas Posted August 28, 2020 Posted August 28, 2020 (edited) Looking through that list I could see him anywhere from 12-20. The rookies are all wildcards and any given day he could be better than Glennon, Manion, Geno, Henne, Daniel, McCarron and Stidham. Barkley has actually been more effective than all of them, even with his noodle arm. 9 hours ago, CapeBreton said: 20-32 are all interchangeable, those are some bad QBs at the bottom. I hope we never see Barkley on the field except for blowouts where he finishes the game, he is not good. With this list I honestly feel 12-32 are all interchangeable on any given day. Mike Glennon is #13 and Hurts at #12 has yet to play an NFL down. He's a total. wildcard when the bullets fly at the NFL level. Edited August 28, 2020 by BillsRdue 2
Paulus Posted August 28, 2020 Posted August 28, 2020 Member when Demitris Bell was a top 5 LT according to many posters on here, and PfffffffffT? I member.
Big C Posted August 28, 2020 Posted August 28, 2020 12 hours ago, GunnerBill said: 22nd to 27th was where I have him. I'd have him closer to the bottom than the top of that range. I think my list he was 26th. But 23rd? That is fair enough. He is in the right grouping of other guys on the list. The one that is way too high for me is Schaub. You think Nick Mullins at 6 is fair?
GunnerBill Posted August 28, 2020 Posted August 28, 2020 1 hour ago, Big C said: You think Nick Mullins at 6 is fair? I think it is a little high maybe but he is top 10/12.
Recommended Posts