SectionC3 Posted September 10, 2020 Author Posted September 10, 2020 9 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: I think I said I don’t play by the rules and I surely don’t jump to your “comply” demand. So you lost the debate and bailed. I get it. Hoax. I don’t jump to your comply demands. If you show me the discussion, I’ll be happy to continue it with you. It’s hard for me to know what you would like to talk about unless you show it to me. Hence Rule #2. We can’t play guessing games here. So if you’d like to continue the discussion, please take the time that you previously dedicated to declaring a fake victory in an Internet discussion and let the person with whom you have engaged know what exactly it is that you would like to discuss. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. 1
DFT Posted September 10, 2020 Posted September 10, 2020 56 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. I don’t jump to your comply demands. If you show me the discussion, I’ll be happy to continue it with you. It’s hard for me to know what you would like to talk about unless you show it to me. Hence Rule #2. We can’t play guessing games here. So if you’d like to continue the discussion, please take the time that you previously dedicated to declaring a fake victory in an Internet discussion and let the person with whom you have engaged know what exactly it is that you would like to discuss. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. The pinta...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 10, 2020 Posted September 10, 2020 1 hour ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. I don’t jump to your comply demands. If you show me the discussion, I’ll be happy to continue it with you. It’s hard for me to know what you would like to talk about unless you show it to me. Hence Rule #2. We can’t play guessing games here. So if you’d like to continue the discussion, please take the time that you previously dedicated to declaring a fake victory in an Internet discussion and let the person with whom you have engaged know what exactly it is that you would like to discuss. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Simple Jim only asks questions, he does not discuss. You should know this by now. 1
Nanker Posted September 10, 2020 Posted September 10, 2020 Liar is still lying in this Liberal echo chamber! 2 1
Chef Jim Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 11 hours ago, SectionC3 said: So if you’d like to continue the discussion, please take the time that you previously dedicated to declaring a fake victory in an Internet discussion and let the person with whom you have engaged know what exactly it is that you would like to discuss. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Already done dude. You’re welcome in advance.
SectionC3 Posted September 11, 2020 Author Posted September 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Chef Jim said: Already done dude. You’re welcome in advance. I gotta Rule #2 this one.
meazza Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: I gotta Rule #2 this one. You ran to the mods, you have no right to cite the rules 2
B-Man Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 1 minute ago, meazza said: You ran to the mods, you have no right to cite the rules But it is kinda funny how he is misunderstanding what Rule #2 states. Personally , I think that he has used it so much that he is just lost now. 1
Q-baby! Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 6 minutes ago, meazza said: You ran to the mods, you have no right to cite the rules Lots of you pansies do that here.
GG Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Personally , I think that he has used it so much that he is just lost now. Kind of like a hoax? What a pathetic existence. 1
Chef Jim Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 2 hours ago, Q-baby! said: Lots of you pansies do that here. They do? With all the ***** that goes on here if there was a lot of going on there would be a lot more suspensions. 2 hours ago, SectionC3 said: I gotta Rule #2 this one. What is rule #2?
meazza Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 6 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: They do? With all the ***** that goes on here if there was a lot of going on there would be a lot more suspensions. What is rule #2? Rule #1, don’t talk about PPP. Rule #2 Refer to rule #1 2 1
3rdnlng Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 7 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: They do? With all the ***** that goes on here if there was a lot of going on there would be a lot more suspensions. What is rule #2? Anything having to do with 3rd Chair is #2. If he's truly an attorney he has totally wasted an expensive education. On the other hand, he might be kept on someones payroll because, sorta like they need a notary public. 1
Chef Jim Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 9 minutes ago, meazza said: Rule #1, don’t talk about PPP. Rule #2 Refer to rule #1 So it really is #2.
meazza Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 45 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: So it really is #2. Read rule #1 again.
Azalin Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 54 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: So it really is #2. I see what you did there. 1 1
Q-baby! Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 6 hours ago, Chef Jim said: They do? With all the ***** that goes on here if there was a lot of going on there would be a lot more suspensions. Right on cue! 😂😂😂
Chef Jim Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Q-baby! said: Right on cue! 😂😂😂 Just pointing out you’re full of ***** as usual.
SectionC3 Posted September 11, 2020 Author Posted September 11, 2020 56 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Just pointing out you’re full of ***** as usual. Rule #2, please.
Q-baby! Posted September 11, 2020 Posted September 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Chef Jim said: Just pointing out you’re full of ***** as usual. Wrong!
Recommended Posts