BillStime Posted November 12, 2021 Posted November 12, 2021 1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Not victims, preps trying to kill some guy that shot them. So are we running with the biased judge narrative from here? On the other hand just use your imagination and visualize Rittenhouse was a BLM activist and you can advocate for his innocence and decry the injustices of the legal system. Whether Kyle is innocent or guilty - the judge is beyond complicit. And if you want to play the imagination game - visualize Kyle black. Idiots
SoCal Deek Posted November 12, 2021 Posted November 12, 2021 1 minute ago, BillStime said: Whether Kyle is innocent or guilty - the judge is beyond complicit. And if you want to play the imagination game - visualize Kyle black. Idiots Is the point of this post to suggest that white people aren’t murdered? Or is it that black people aren't arrested? Which one?
BillStime Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Is the point of this post to suggest that white people aren’t murdered? Or is it that black people aren't arrested? Which one? I can’t help you w your lack of reading comprehension skills.
SoCal Deek Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 1 minute ago, BillStime said: I can’t help you w your lack of reading comprehension skills. I guess so. I’m sure whoever cherry picked those photos is a genius….like you!
BillStime Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I guess so. I’m sure whoever cherry picked those photos is a genius….like you! Truth hurts I see.
SoCal Deek Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 Just now, BillStime said: Truth hurts I see. Truth…you can’t handle the truth.
unbillievable Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 When did "God Bless America" become racist?
BillStime Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said: Truth…you can’t handle the truth. If only the Republican party had a few good men.
Chef Jim Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 7 minutes ago, BillStime said: I can’t help you w your lack of reading comprehension skills. Reading comprehension? It's a series of captioned pictures that has zero context. 😂 1
SoCal Deek Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 Just now, BillStime said: If only the Republican party had a few good men. Ya see? I knew you had a sense of humor hiding under all that hate! 👍 Hope you have a great weekend. Go Bills! (Please, God!) 1
Dukestreetking Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 3 hours ago, BillStime said: Might be self defense but a 17 year old showing up w a AR-15 wasn’t looking to play medic. I was going to thoughtfully reply to this--using the utter absence of doctrinal res ipsa loquitur and lack of "facts in evidence"--but further colloquy would get us nowhere. Honestly, anyone who still believes Mike Brown was "murdered" (per your poster) has only a loose association with...well, the Truth. I urge you to read the Obama DoJ report on the matter, which finds no evidence for Ofc Wilson indictment. Take care and good luck.
BillStime Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 3 minutes ago, Dukestreetking said: I was going to thoughtfully reply to this--using the utter absence of doctrinal res ipsa loquitur and lack of "facts in evidence"--but further colloquy would get us nowhere. Honestly, anyone who still believes Mike Brown was "murdered" (per your poster) has only a loose association with...well, the Truth. I urge you to read the Obama DoJ report on the matter, which finds no evidence for Ofc Wilson indictment. Take care and good luck. You can thoughtfully do whatever you like - but the simple fact is: Kyle broke the law carrying that AR-15 per Wisconsin Statute 948.60(2)(a) and he killed two people and injured one And regarding res ipsa loquitur - tell us - was Kyle reckless? Was he careless? After all, he showed up with an AR-15 and pretended to be an EMT. Was he in control of that gun? What was his intent? Would the VICTIMS be dead if Kyle would have followed the law and did not have that gun? Don't know Is it possible Kyle was acting in self defense? Sure. Is it possible Kyle came to Wisconsin to defend property? Possibly. Is it reasonable? No. Did the prosecution have enough evidence? Probably not. But the truth is - you don't show up with an AR-15 pretending to play medic and not find yourself in a CARELESS situation. 1
snafu Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 14 hours ago, BillStime said: You can thoughtfully do whatever you like - but the simple fact is: Kyle broke the law carrying that AR-15 per Wisconsin Statute 948.60(2)(a) and he killed two people and injured one And regarding res ipsa loquitur - tell us - was Kyle reckless? Was he careless? After all, he showed up with an AR-15 and pretended to be an EMT. Was he in control of that gun? What was his intent? Would the VICTIMS be dead if Kyle would have followed the law and did not have that gun? Don't know Is it possible Kyle was acting in self defense? Sure. Is it possible Kyle came to Wisconsin to defend property? Possibly. Is it reasonable? No. Did the prosecution have enough evidence? Probably not. But the truth is - you don't show up with an AR-15 pretending to play medic and not find yourself in a CARELESS situation. I’ve been reading your posts. I disagree that this case has vast societal implications. I disagree that the outcome of this case legitimizes one particular “side” or another. People want to make it that way and it is disappointing. I have no rooting interest in the outcome of this case, I just find it interesting. Couldn’t your questions be turned around and asked about the people who were shot by the Defendant? Were the people who were shot locals from Kenosha? Were they there doing lawful things just prior to being shot? Did they put themselves and others in a careless situation? Did they put themselves in a situation where the Defendant thought he had no other choice but to shoot them? If the Defendant is acquitted because he acted in self-defense, then are the people who were shot properly called “victims”?
BillStime Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 4 minutes ago, snafu said: I’ve been reading your posts. I disagree that this case has vast societal implications. I disagree that the outcome of this case legitimizes one particular “side” or another. People want to make it that way and it is disappointing. I have no rooting interest in the outcome of this case, I just find it interesting. Couldn’t your questions be turned around and asked about the people who were shot by the Defendant? Were the people who were shot locals from Kenosha? Were they there doing lawful things just prior to being shot? Did they put themselves and others in a careless situation? Did they put themselves in a situation where the Defendant thought he had no other choice but to shoot them? If the Defendant is acquitted because he acted in self-defense, then are the people who were shot properly called “victims”? vic·tim /ˈviktəm/ noun a person harmed, injured, or killed as a result of a crime, accident, or other event or action. PS: Kyle should NEVER have had a gun in the first place
Doc Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 27 minutes ago, BillStime said: vic·tim /ˈviktəm/ noun a person harmed, injured, or killed as a result of a crime, accident, or other event or action. PS: Kyle should NEVER have had a gun in the first place You mean like Ashli Babbitt? And it will be interesting to see who George Soros pays to riot after Rittenhouse is found not guilty.
BillStime Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 1 minute ago, Doc said: You mean like Ashli Babbitt? And it will be interesting to see who George Soros pays to riot after Rittenhouse is found not guilty. Yeah definitely - Ashli is a victim just like you and the rest of your pathetic gullible cult.
Doc Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: Yeah definitely - Ashli is a victim just like you and the rest of your pathetic gullible cult. LOL! The Dems are the party of victims. And by electing the idiots you do, we all become victims.
B-Man Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 Imagine waking up and agreeing with the idea that anyone suggesting Rittenhouse deserves due process is fascist. Liberalism is a Mental illness.
BillStime Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 2 minutes ago, Doc said: LOL! The Dems are the party of victims. And by electing the idiots you do, we all become victims. Awe poor doc - now you sound like Josh Hawley. Struggling w your identity? Everyone else’s fault you’re insecure and gullible af?
Doc Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 1 minute ago, BillStime said: Awe poor doc - now you sound like Josh Hawley. Struggling w your identity? Everyone else’s fault you’re insecure and gullible af? No, I'm not a Dem. 1
Recommended Posts