Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

Another new ID.  The little TDS crowd is trying sooooo hard, but can't figure out that when you are so angry at everything it makes you really bad at humor!

 

This is what happens when leftists realize they're incapable of logical discussions. Create another user ID and pollute the board under the guise of "I'm doing this to laugh at people."

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Those aren’t my standards. The question stands.  How do you know that this person is a communist? 

 

I'm applying the standards of the people you unequivocally support. 

 

Take it up with them, then come back here.

Posted
11 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

This is what happens when leftists realize they're incapable of logical discussions. Create another user ID and pollute the board under the guise of "I'm doing this to laugh at people."

 

 

 

Have to do something when 90% of the people here put them on ignore.

 

I have about 10 accounts on ignore... it's maybe 2 people.

Posted
10 hours ago, Tiberius said:

When Trump or some other racist does something evil, all we hear is "Oh everyone is bad!" 

 

That's such a dodge. Comparing Obama to this corrupt, anti-democratic regime is sickening,. I suppose Hitler's supporters blamed the Weimar Republic for all the violence he fostered 

You are the guy who always, without a doubt, and with no uncertainty made excuses for Obama's lies saying on numerous occasions that all politicians lie. Hypocrisy lives within you. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

You have a different view on this. If I was to resist arrest on a charge of running a red light, there is no justification that would make it ok to shoot me in the back 7 times. 

Cops have enough training and tools at their disposal to not kill a person over a traffic stop. 

While this young criminal did not die, he appears to be paralyzed, but is either outcome even remotely acceptable. 

The answer is no.

Find another way....has nothing changed since Tombstone.

This guy is not John Dillinger or Bonnie and Clyde. 

Unless significant change occurs, and the time is right for it, it appears, can you see where the future is going...

Yes you have looters and pros in riots, but change needs to happen

Well, maybe if they had read your posts here they could justify it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Well, maybe if they had read your posts here they could justify it. 

 

Yikes, talk about cruel and unusual punishment. Wouldn't bleach to their eyes give the same effect as reading his posts, whilst still being less painful?

Posted (edited)

So, now that the picture is clear, let’s make it abundantly clear how unfathomably ***** and racist the OP was acting when he made this thread, when he accused Kyle Riitenhouse of being a “white supremacist domestic terrorist”.

 

- Rittenhouse worked for the business he was defending.

 

- Rittenhouse lived 30 minutes away.

 

- Rittenhouse observed absurd levels of trigger discipline.


- Rittenhouse was rushed by Gaige Grosskruetz, 26.  A member of The People’s Revolution Movement, a Communist organization, and a convicted felon for whom it is a felony to possess a gun.  Grosskruetz was chasing Rittenhouse, with the stated intention of “unloading the entire magazine into (Rittenhouse)”.

 

- Rittenhouse fired a single shot into the arm of Grosskruetz.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36.  Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile, registered as a sex offender in two states, attacked Rittenhouse, knocking him to the ground and tried to disarm him before he was fatally shot for his efforts.  Rittenhouse fired two shots at Rosenbaum.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Anthony Huber, 26.  Huber, a convicted wife beater, attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard while he was already on the ground.  He is on video hitting him in the head and face with a weapon.  Rittenhouse fired a single shot into Huber, killing him, ending the assault.
 

- Rittenhouse showed incredible restraint from a defensive firearms training perspective.  He was justified in shooting each aggressor far earlier than he did.

 

- Rittenhouse, in a crowded area, under riot conditions, fired only four shots, eliminating all three threats with no collateral damage.

 

As far as the OP goes, Rittenhouse was in the wrong.  The pedophile, the wife beater, and the convicted felon, all Communist revolutionaries, all assaulting him, atleast one with the expressed intent to murder him, are downtrodden heroes.

 

Oh, that and Rittenhouse, according to him, is a white supremacist.  Without evidence.

 

Carry on.

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
  • Like (+1) 8
  • Awesome! (+1) 6
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
21 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 


- Rittenhouse was rushed by Gaige Grosskruetz, 26.  A member of The People’s Revolution Movement, a Communist organization, ....

 

No, not that kind of Communist.  You know the gentle, nice kind they portray in textbooks.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

So, now that the picture is clear, let’s make it abundantly clear how unfathomably ***** and racist the OP was acting when he made this thread, when he accused Kyle Riitenhouse of being a “white supremacist domestic terrorist”.

 

- Rittenhouse worked for the business he was defending.

 

- Rittenhouse lived 30 minutes away.

 

- Rittenhouse observed absurd levels of trigger discipline.


- Rittenhouse was rushed by Gaige Grosskruetz, 26.  A member of The People’s Revolution Movement, a Communist organization, and a convicted felon for whom it is a felony to possess a gun.  Grosskruetz was chasing Rittenhouse, with the stated intention of “unloading the entire magazine into (Rittenhouse)”.

 

- Rittenhouse fired a single shot into the arm of Grosskruetz.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36.  Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile, registered as a sex offender in two states, attacked Rittenhouse, knocking him to the ground and tried to disarm him before he was fatally shot for his efforts.  Rittenhouse fired two shots at Rosenbaum.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Anthony Huber, 26.  Huber, a convicted wife beater, attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard while he was already on the ground.  He is on video hitting him in the head and face with a weapon.  Rittenhouse fired a single shot into Huber, killing him, ending the assault.
 

- Rittenhouse showed incredible restraint from a defensive firearms training perspective.  He was justified in shooting each aggressor far earlier than he did.

 

- Rittenhouse, in a crowded area, under riot conditions, fired only four shots, eliminating all three threats with no collateral damage.

 

As far as the OP goes, Rittenhouse was in the wrong.  The pedophile, the wife beater, and the convicted felon, all Communist revolutionaries, all assaulting him, atleast one with the expressed intent to murder him, are downtrodden heroes.

 

Oh, that and Rittenhouse, according to him, is a white supremacist.  Without evidence.

 

Carry on.

I was just chatting with a bunch of friends about how incredible he actually was. Whether or not his intent was to destroy that guys right arm and immediately end that threat, or whether it was just luck...the fact that he immediately recognized that that threat was now neutralized and fired no additional shots - all under extreme pressure- was truly extraordinary.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

So, now that the picture is clear, let’s make it abundantly clear how unfathomably ***** and racist the OP was acting when he made this thread, when he accused Kyle Riitenhouse of being a “white supremacist domestic terrorist”.

 

- Rittenhouse worked for the business he was defending.

 

- Rittenhouse lived 30 minutes away.

 

- Rittenhouse observed absurd levels of trigger discipline.


- Rittenhouse was rushed by Gaige Grosskruetz, 26.  A member of The People’s Revolution Movement, a Communist organization, and a convicted felon for whom it is a felony to possess a gun.  Grosskruetz was chasing Rittenhouse, with the stated intention of “unloading the entire magazine into (Rittenhouse)”.

 

- Rittenhouse fired a single shot into the arm of Grosskruetz.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36.  Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile, registered as a sex offender in two states, attacked Rittenhouse, knocking him to the ground and tried to disarm him before he was fatally shot for his efforts.  Rosenbaum fired two shots at Rosenbaum.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Anthony Huber, 26.  Huber, a convicted wife beater, attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard while he was already on the ground.  He is on video hitting him in the head and face with a weapon.  Rittenhouse fired a single shot into Huber, killing him, ending the assault.
 

- Rittenhouse showed incredible restraint from a defensive firearms training perspective.  He was justified in shooting each aggressor far earlier than he did.

 

- Rittenhouse, in a crowded area, under riot conditions, fired only four shots, eliminating all three threats with no collateral damage.

 

As far as the OP goes, Rittenhouse was in the wrong.  The pedophile, the wife beater, and the convicted felon, all Communist revolutionaries, all assaulting him, atleast one with the expressed intent to murder him, are downtrodden heroes.

 

Oh, that and Rittenhouse, according to him, is a white supremacist.  Without evidence.

 

Carry on.

 

If I had a 17 year old son who told me he was going to go to work after hours with a rifle to defend his employer's property in that environment I would have advised him not to go and would have prevented it however necessary.  Too risky for not much reward.  I'd call Rittenhouse very foolish.

 

That said looking at the videos he performed (there's probably a better word for it) with amazing poise and discipline especially for his age.  He was very prepared, much more so than his attackers.  He has obviously studied and is trained in the use of firearms and in law enforcement and in the rules of engagement.  This could have ended up very badly for him, he easily could have been killed.  His antagonists were also very foolish and some paid the price. 

 

What's happened in Kenosha is no different than a sibling battle.  One throws a punch never thinking about what comes after that and so on.  The lack of law enforcement we've seen in several cities in recent months essentially guarantees escalation making these outcomes predictable.

 

Detroit is one city that has nipped this in the bud essentially by making arrests upon the first brick being thrown and not allowing mobs to block streets and loot.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2020/08/24/chief-detroit-police-prevented-seattle-zone-lawlessness/5624097002/

 

 

Edited by keepthefaith
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The Trump Virus said:

I’m not angry. I am having fun laughing at you. Huge difference. 

 

.....from behind yet another lame, new name.  You're not clever enough to laugh at anybody.  And you know it.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Sig1Hunter said:

I was just chatting with a bunch of friends about how incredible he actually was. Whether or not his intent was to destroy that guys right arm and immediately end that threat, or whether it was just luck...the fact that he immediately recognized that that threat was now neutralized and fired no additional shots - all under extreme pressure- was truly extraordinary.


It’s the very best trigger discipline I’ve ever seen, bar none.

 

He was being assaulted by multiple people, in the middle of a riot, fired exactly four shots to stop three targets, with zero collateral damage, from his ass/back after enduring multiple assaults.
 

The should use him to teach classes.

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
15 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

If I had a 17 year old son who told me he was going to go to work after hours with a rifle to defend his employer's property in that environment I would have advised him not to go and would have prevented it however necessary.  Too risky for not much reward.  I'd call Rittenhouse very foolish.

 

That said looking at the videos he performed (there's probably a better word for it) with amazing poise and discipline especially for his age.  He was very prepared, much more so than his attackers.  He has obviously studied and is trained in the use of firearms and in law enforcement and in the rules of engagement.  This could have ended up very badly for him, he easily could have been killed.  His antagonists were also very foolish and some paid the price. 

 

What's happened in Kenosha is no different than a sibling battle.  One throws a punch never thinking about what comes after that and so on.  The lack of law enforcement we've seen in several cities in recent months essentially guarantees escalation making these outcomes predictable.

 

Detroit is one city that has nipped this in the bud essentially by making arrests upon the first brick being thrown and not allowing mobs to block streets and loot.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2020/08/24/chief-detroit-police-prevented-seattle-zone-lawlessness/5624097002/

 

 


I say this in the abstract, without judgment.

 

We used to raise our children to believe in higher ideals.

 

That principles are more important than individuals, and that there are things worth dying for. Like standing up for traditional values against Communists. 
 

Join the Army you’ll say. Why? To kill brown kids in Third World Countries?


No. The principled man stands against the Communists in his own streets, and he raises his children to do the same.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

And so a few marxists/communists show up to overthrow your country trump turns to a 17 yr old.

The fbi dies know who they are?

The moment is too big again, just like covid19 was to too big.

FIFY, again.

Posted
1 hour ago, GG said:

 

I'm applying the standards of the people you unequivocally support. 

 

Take it up with them, then come back here.

So ... you don’t know this guys was or is a communist, and you just made it up.  Got it, hoaxer. 

27 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


I say this in the abstract, without judgment.

 

We used to raise our children to believe in higher ideals.

 

That principles are more important than individuals, and that there are things worth dying for. Like standing up for traditional values against Communists. 
 

Join the Army you’ll say. Why? To kill brown kids in Third World Countries?


No. The principled man stands against the Communists in his own streets, and he raises his children to do the same.

Your ability to spot communists is incredible. Could you please teach us all how to spot the communist? 

×
×
  • Create New...