Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Hatch Act of 1939 - Wikipedia

 
Someone needs to reread  have it read to him.
 
 
 
 
 

 

Nice.  Donnie is exempted.  But all those people who set the stage for him?  Oops.  Not as much.  And Chad Wolf?  He's not the president or the Vice President.  Oops again.  But you're the rule of law party!  Makes. Perfect. Sense. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Nice.  Donnie is exempted.  But all those people who set the stage for him?  Oops.  Not as much.  And Chad Wolf?  He's not the president or the Vice President.  Oops again.  But you're the rule of law party!  Makes. Perfect. Sense. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

New entry for hate week:  the Bible.  Trump doesn’t follow it, doesn’t respect it, and hasn’t read it.  And, to the extent his fake Christian followers have read it, they blithely ignore it and worship their false idol.  So, biblical teachings, GTFO.  The prosperity gospel runs this show. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

New entry for hate week:  the Bible.  Trump doesn’t follow it, doesn’t respect it, and hasn’t read it.  And, to the extent his fake Christian followers have read it, they blithely ignore it and worship their false idol.  So, biblical teachings, GTFO.  The prosperity gospel runs this show. 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Let us know when you're going to give back the part of your government salary that you "earned" working from home during the pandemic.  What's good for the goose is good for the gander.  You want teachers to take a haircut?  Step right up and do the same.  If you're going to lead, you have to do it from the front!

 

It's adorable when you have no clue what you're talking about. You know, which is almost always.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Wacka said:

Hate Has No Home Here

 

It resides at the DNC

 

Unfortunately, nonsense like this is all they have left. Trump broke the left.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

It's adorable when you have no clue what you're talking about. You know, which is almost always.

So I take it you’re not giving it back?  Makes sense.  It’s OK for you to work from home at a full rate, but teachers can’t do the same.  

 

***

 

And, basically, when you really think about it, you’re a socialist.  But the OK kind that Trump likes.  Cash the Trump socialism bucks?  I bet you did.  Take government money for nothing when you’re “working” from home?  All signs point to yes.  But you’re a “Republican,” so when you engage in the practice it’s not socialism.  It’s only when others do it that it counts as socialism.  

 

Edited by SectionC3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

So I take it you’re not giving it back?  Makes sense.  It’s OK for you to work from home at a full rate, but teachers can’t do the same.  

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

So I take it you’re not giving it back?  Makes sense.  It’s OK for you to work from home at a full rate, but teachers can’t do the same.  

 

***

 

And, basically, when you really think about it, you’re a socialist.  But the OK kind that Trump likes.  Cash the Trump socialism bucks?  I bet you did.  Take government money for nothing when you’re “working” from home?  All signs point to yes.  But you’re a “Republican,” so when you engage in the practice it’s not socialism.  It’s only when others do it that it counts as socialism.  

 

 

The ignorance on display here is simply breathtaking. Well done, my friend.

 

The sad part is that you actually seem to think that you're being witty and clever.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

The ignorance on display here is simply breathtaking. Well done, my friend.

 

The sad part is that you actually seem to think that you're being witty and clever.

He's a lawyer, the first class they take in law school is how to lie and BS 101, lawyers are so unethical they'd sell their mother out to make a buck......what do you call 500 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?.......a good start

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

The ignorance on display here is simply breathtaking. Well done, my friend.

 

The sad part is that you actually seem to think that you're being witty and clever.

 

You keep on saying ignorance, but you don’t have any, you know, specific reasons why it’s ignorance.  

 

Maybe it’s sort of an “alternative ignorance,” kind of like your alternative reality in which you’re not benefitting from socialism (even though you really have) but it’s cool for you to repeat some BS tropes and allege that teachers should take a haircut because they don’t deserve full dime for working from home. 

36 minutes ago, bilzfancy said:

He's a lawyer, the first class they take in law school is how to lie and BS 101, lawyers are so unethical they'd sell their mother out to make a buck......what do you call 500 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?.......a good start

 

Aren’t you the same guy who was railing against absentee voting by mail this morning but then clammed up when you realized that your boy Trump votes that way?

Edited by SectionC3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

 

You keep on saying ignorance, but you don’t have any, you know, specific reasons why it’s ignorance.  

 

Maybe it’s sort of an “alternative ignorance,” kind of like you alternative reality in which you’re not benefitting from socialism (even though you really have) but it’s cool for you to repeat some BS tropes and allege that teachers should take a haircut because they don’t deserve full dime for working from home. 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

You keep on saying ignorance, but you don’t have any, you know, specific reasons why it’s ignorance. 

 

Why, when I can just sit back and laugh at your ignorance as you post nonsense like:

 

7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Maybe it’s sort of an “alternative ignorance,” kind of like you alternative reality in which you’re not benefitting from socialism (even though you really have) but it’s cool for you to repeat some BS tropes and allege that teachers should take a haircut because they don’t deserve full dime for working from home.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, and I'm not here to educate you as to how I make my money.

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Koko78 said:

 

Why, when I can just sit back and laugh at your ignorance as you post nonsense like:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, and I'm not here to educate you as to how I make my money.

 

Gov’t bucks.  That’s how you make it.  And you have time to respond, but no time to come up with facts.  Lame response from lame boonies lawyer. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Gov’t bucks.  That’s how you make it.  And you have time to respond, but no time to come up with facts.  Lame response from lame boonies lawyer. 

 

How many hours am I paid to work? How many hours did I work?

 

Your ignorance continues to amuse me. Almost as much as when you're trying (and failing) to be witty and clever.

Edited by Koko78
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

You keep on saying ignorance, but you don’t have any, you know, specific reasons why it’s ignorance.  

 

Maybe it’s sort of an “alternative ignorance,” kind of like your alternative reality in which you’re not benefitting from socialism (even though you really have) but it’s cool for you to repeat some BS tropes and allege that teachers should take a haircut because they don’t deserve full dime for working from home. 

 

Aren’t you the same guy who was railing against absentee voting by mail this morning but then clammed up when you realized that your boy Trump votes that way?

More ignorance on your part, I never said anything about absentee ballots, in fact, I've said many times if you are away from home, or sick, or unable to vote in person absentee is fine, but other than that no excuse not to vote in person

Posted
3 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

How many hours am I paid to work? How many hours did I work?

 

Your ignorance continues to amuse me. Almost as much as when you're trying (and failing) to be witty and clever.

 

Nice.  So it is gov’t bucks.  That’s a start. 

 

Now, let’s move to step #2.  Where was that work performed?  I’m going to take a whack at it and say that much of it was not performed in either your publicly-provided office or in a courtroom.  More specifically, it was performed at home.  

 

So, the question remains, why is it acceptable for you to get paid in government funds for work performed from home, but unacceptable for teachers to be compensated with like monies for work performed in a like location?   

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Nice.  So it is gov’t bucks.  That’s a start. 

 

Now, let’s move to step #2.  Where was that work performed?  I’m going to take a whack at it and say that much of it was not performed in either your publicly-provided office or in a courtroom.  More specifically, it was performed at home.  

 

So, the question remains, why is it acceptable for you to get paid in government funds for work performed from home, but unacceptable for teachers to be compensated with like monies for work performed in a like location?   

 

Love the unsupported suppositions in your little straw man.

 

Man, you must be very blissful, with such an amazing display of ignorance.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...