Kamala Harris is the next VP

[B-Man]

 

 

 

                                           

[SoCal Deek]

14 hours ago, B-Man said:

😂

 

Kamala Changes Declaration of Independence, Demolishes Democrats on Abortion in Process

 

 

It’s quite something to keep up with Kamala Harris’ word salads — all the things she says that are just nonsense. She says so much that is cringeworthy and just empty filler words thrown up against the wall intending to sound profound.

 

{snip}

 

Just like with Joe Biden, there’s the incoherence, and then there’s the lies — the things that they say just to push their political narrative, even if they’re not true or they’re spinning the facts.

 

That was what Kamala Harris did during her her abortion speech on Sunday. She ranted that some Republicans were promoting a national abortion ban. “How dare they?!” she yelled. Um, because they believe that it’s a life and they dare to protect lives, not to advocate for the killing of unborn babies as she does? She acted like she had the moral high ground there with that Greta Thunberg-like line when she doesn’t.

 

But Harris didn’t leave it there. She was talking about the Declaration of Independence and she left out a very critical part.

 

 

“We collectively believe and know, America is a promise,” Harris said. “It is a promise of freedom and liberty. Not just some, but for all. A promise we made in the Declaration of Independence, that we are each endowed with the right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Be clear, these rights were not bestowed upon us, they belong to us as Americans.”

 

Kamala just left out the “life” part of that guarantee — that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” That’s not just a “promise,” those are supposed to be our “unalienable rights.” But she left out “life” because it was inconvenient to the pro-abortion narrative that she was ranting about. It exposed that rant for what it was — depriving that very right to life. Of course, she also left out the “endowed by their Creator” part.

 

But the funny thing in leaving it out is she’s admitting the problem then. By doing so, she’s acknowledging the flaw in her argument — that yes, it’s life. If she didn’t think it was, why would she leave the word out then?

 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/01/23/kamala-changes-declaration-of-independence-demolishes-dems-on-abortion-in-process-n692823

 

.

.

Now, if we had a functioning media, they would ask her point blank about that obviously intentional omission. If you don’t believe in your oath of office…you shouldn’t swear to uphold it. 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

Democrats worry Kamala Harris won't cut it as the future of the party (including Sen. Warren)

by John Sexton

 

There aren’t many things that Democrats and Republicans agree about these days but one of the few on which there seems to be general accord is that Kamala Harris is not a credible presidential candidate.

 

Today the Washington Post published a story for which they spoke to more than a dozen Democrats who are worried about VP Harris’ role in the party’s future. The piece opens with an on-the-record comment from former Cobb County Democratic leader Jacquelyn Bettadapur: Many Democrats, Bettadapur said, “don’t know enough about what she’s doing” — and, she added, “it doesn’t help that she’s not [that] adept as a communicator.”

 

 

https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2023/01/30/democrats-worry-kamala-harris-wont-cut-it-as-the-future-of-the-party-including-sen-warren-n527456

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/01/30/harris-democrats-worry/

 

[Doc]

She's an anchor that they can't get rid of without pissing-off a lot of their base.

[B-Man]

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

She's an anchor that they can't get rid of without pissing-off a lot of their base.

 

 

I'm gonna disagree with you here Doc.

 

The majority of African-Americans know that Kamal isn't up to the job.

 

Thats why the Dems are talking about it.

 

 

.

[Doc]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

I'm gonna disagree with you here Doc.

 

The majority of African-Americans know that Kamal isn't up to the job.

 

Thats why the Dems are talking about it.

 

But what are they going to do?  They'd have to replace her with another black woman.

[SoCal Deek]

10 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

But what are they going to do?  They'd have to replace her with another black woman.

And guess who that’s gonna be! 

[BillsFanNC]

 

 

[Doc]

19 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

And guess who that’s gonna be! 

 

Stacy Abrams?  LOL!  Good luck.

[SoCal Deek]

7 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Stacy Abrams?  LOL!  Good luck.

Nope….guess again. Rhymes with Osama. 😁

[Doc]

32 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Nope….guess again. Rhymes with Osama. 😁

 

Michelle?  No chance.

[Biden is Mentally Fit]

NYT has decided to double dip on misogyny and racism. Damn conservative rag!!

[B-Man]

3 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

NYT has decided to double dip on misogyny and racism. Damn conservative rag!!

 

 

               OPERATION ‘DUMP KAMALA’ IS OFFICIALLY ON

 

 

This “news story” was reported by three Times journalists, but what is the actual “news” that would prompt such an article?

 

Did she collapse while being bundled into a van on a campaign swing? Did she seem to suffer a stroke mid-sentence, like her boss?

 

No: this story has all the hallmarks of agenda journalism untethered to any actual news event.

 

The article quotes almost no one by name, relying on the favorite media source in politics—”Anonymous”—supposedly for fear of offending the Biden White House.

 

Maybe, but more likely this is a premier instance of “ventriloquist journalism,” where you find a source (and “anonymous” courses are best of all, even when they aren’t made up) to ratify a preexisting story line.

 

In other words, the Times editors decided the time had some to put out a more explicit hit piece on Kamala, and assigned their best political reporters to run the usual playbook. A story like this doesn’t just happen without editorial deliberation.

 

The resulting article is stunning in its negative portrayal of Harris:

 

 

More at the link: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/02/operation-dump-kamala-is-officially-on.php

 

 

.

[BillsFanNC]

 

 

[aristocrat]

 

[Doc]

5 hours ago, aristocrat said:

 

 

She really sounds like an idiot.  You would think that if this were an act, she would have changed it awhile ago.  Which leads me to conclude it's no act.

[B-Man]

 

 

 

Vice President Kamala Harris graciously took some time out of her busy schedule at the Munich Security Conference to sit down with MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell for a one-on-one interview.

And it went just as well as you’d expect a one-on-one interview with Kamala Harris to go:

 

 

Shall we give transcribing it a shot? All right, here we go:

 

Kamala Harris: “But when you present, the, the, the suggestion that anyone is saying, um, that, that it is time for a new generation, and they’re running against the person who is president, um, and it, when presented as though it’s an attack, I would like to let, let us all be clear that the attack is misplaced. If the point of it is that we need leadership that is strong, because we have a strong leader in Joe Biden.”

 

Andrea Mitchell: “Thank you very much, Madam Vice President. Thank you for your time.”

 

Kamala Harris: “Thank you.”

 

 

https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2023/02/17/kamala-harris-response-to-one-last-question-leaves-andrea-mitchell-at-a-loss-for-words/

[Doc]

It's going to be fun watching them dump her and what her reaction, and the reaction of the POC community is.

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

[Biden is Mentally Fit]

I was listening to democrat pollster Celinda Lake on tv tonight. TWICE she referred to Kamala-madingdong as incredibly eloquent. Let that sink in for a minute. I understand the need to fluff but to use eloquent??? Good lord man.