Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:

LMAO

 

 

 

Regarding the check, are you suggesting that Trump should have paid Cohen for legal services using taxpayer or campaign dollars rather than from his own account?

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
4 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

For what?   OMG   how blind are you?  

 

 

Are you really in the medical profession?   Are you not the guy from the D&C with the initials NM? 

 

Corruption, collusion, bribery to to start. 

 

Yeah.  I keep hearing the same old tired stuff everyday.  Wake me when it happens.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Doc said:

Notice how they're desperately trying to claim that criticizing Kam is sexist?  Sigh.


well, isn’t saying she slept and blew her way to the top a little sexist?  It doesn’t bother me and I’m not offended (who cares), but if people don’t want their criticism not giving rise to the sexist card...shouldn’t they keep their criticism substantive?

Posted
1 minute ago, Crayola64 said:

well, isn’t saying she slept and blew her way to the top a little sexist?  It doesn’t bother me and I’m not offended (who cares), but if people don’t want their criticism not giving rise to the sexist card...shouldn’t they keep their criticism substantive?

 

Not if it's true.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Crayola64 said:

is it?  I’m out of the loop and first heard these comments in the past day

 

It's been talked-about since he started running for President.  Someone else can clue you in on the sordid details.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

well, isn’t saying she slept and blew her way to the top a little sexist?  It doesn’t bother me and I’m not offended (who cares), but if people don’t want their criticism not giving rise to the sexist card...shouldn’t they keep their criticism substantive?


MSM and others fat-shamed Sarah Huckabee Sanders mercilessly for years. Still do. Isn't that a little sexist, or is that "different" because "reasons?"

Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

:beer: And, to be fair to @transplantbillsfan , that would be the best thing to do. It would not be fair to him if he wins our avatar bet, but then I'm gone for the year I'm supposed to be rocking it. 

 

Are you seriously telling me you made the avatar bet with me AND a bet that you'd leave for a year at the same time?

 

You do realize if you're gone for a year, you aren't abiding by the terms of our bet because you won't actually be here to sport my new lovely avatar for you, right?

 

So when you lose our bet in November, if your current bet with @Crayola64 is that you have to be gone for a year, then when you come back, you'll have to sport my new avatar.  I have no idea when the 2 of you made your bet, but I know you and I made ours over a year ago, so if you made your bet with him after we made ours, I'm sure you understand you would need to come back with a new avatar.  And if you made the bet with him before me and didn't tell me you'd be gone for a year anyway, that's shady.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Are you seriously telling me you made the avatar bet with me AND a bet that you'd leave for a year at the same time?

 

You do realize if you're gone for a year, you aren't abiding by the terms of our bet because you won't actually be here to sport my new lovely avatar for you, right?

 

So when you lose our bet in November, if your current bet with @Crayola64 is that you have to be gone for a year, then when you come back, you'll have to sport my new avatar.  I have no idea when the 2 of you made your bet, but I know you and I made ours over a year ago, so if you made your bet with him after we made ours, I'm sure you understand you would need to come back with a new avatar.  And if you made the bet with him before me and didn't tell me you'd be gone for a year anyway, that's shady.

 

Reading is hard. Especially for teachers. Try it again.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Golden Goat said:


MSM and others fat-shamed Sarah Huckabee Sanders mercilessly for years. Still do. Isn't that a little sexist, or is that "different" because "reasons?"


How is fat shaming sexist?  Don’t MSM and Dems also fat shame fat male republicans?

Edited by Crayola64
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Crayola64 said:


How is fat shaming sexist?  Don’t MSM and Dems also fat shame fat male republicans?

 

Fat shaming women became sexist around 2016 per the mob.

 

Fat shaming men is not sexist because men don't matter to the mob.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Reading is hard. Especially for teachers. Try it again.

 

Note the operative "?" and word "if" posted multiple times

 

So how about answering the "?" first.  If you didn't make the bet, ignore everything after the "if"

 

 

 

Life is busy.  I'm not breaking down what the two of you did or did not agree upon and whether it was hypothetical or concrete.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
Posted
Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Note the operative "?" and word "if"

 

So how about answering the "?" first.  If you didn't make the bet, ignore everything after the "if"

 

 

 

Life is busy.  I'm not breaking down what the two of you did or did not agree upon and whether it was hypothetical or concrete.

 

You're very dumb. 

 

What was written in the quote you chose was making the opposite point of your assumption. If you can't read and comprehend a simple sentence, maybe you should sit out trying to analyze complex political events ;) 

 

To make it VERY clear, I'll type slow: 

 

I was saying it would be unfair for me to be gone for the same year that I was supposed to be honoring your bet. I was, in fact, being honorable. You took it the exact opposite way because you don't think before you post. 


Try it some time. It'll improve your content by tenfold. 

×
×
  • Create New...