Ed Oliver interview - NFL put him in the drug program?

[GoBills808]

1 minute ago, BullBuchanan said:

Yes, of course I believe that I can say no to the police. Would you let them into your house without a warrant? Would you let them search your trunk without a warrant? You have rights, and as much as they try to act like it, they aren't Kings or deities.

How tf in this day and age do people not know their rights

[Malazan]

2 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

Put it in the trunk. That’s what we do if we have a bottle of wine out with dinner and don’t finish it, or take a bottle to a party to make daiquiris or after dinner drinks, etc.  Restaurants also have some kind of bag to seal up the bottles. 

 

So your container has alcohol in it..which would be a problem. The open container can't have alcohol in it. Now you know..and knowing is half the battle.

Edited August 10, 2020 by jeremy2020

[GoBills808]

Just now, Bangarang said:

Which part is confusing to you? 

The part where you think an empty beer can somehow contain an alcoholic beverage Officer Schroedinger

[Augie]

6 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

So you're container has alcohol in it..which would be a problem. I live in Texas. There is no Texas law about just a container. The open container can't have alcohol in it. 

 

When we lived in SC, the law was if you couldn’t have access to drink WHILE you drive, you were OK. Put partial bottles or recycling in the trunk so they know you’re not hitting on that bottle as you drive. Also, it’s just less likely to even be discovered and become an issue. Take as many steps as possible to to avoid the question entirely. 

 

As is often the case, show some common sense and you’re probably (but not ALWAYS) going to be OK. 

 

 

. 

Edited August 10, 2020 by Augie

[Bangarang]

7 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

The part where you think an empty beer can somehow contain an alcoholic beverage Officer Schroedinger

I literally gave you the section and wording of the violation in NY VTL and you’re still spewing nonsense. You’re beyond helping at this point. Your mind deeply buried in the sand.
 

 

 

Edited August 10, 2020 by Bangarang

[BullBuchanan]

1 minute ago, GoBills808 said:

How tf in this day and age do people not know their rights

Because most people don't question information they're given if they trust the source.

[Andrew Son]

1 minute ago, Bangarang said:

I literally gave you the section and wording of the violation in NY VTL and you’re still spewing nonsense. you’re beyond helping at this point. Your mind deeply buried in the sand.
 

 

 

I think the problem is that you originally stated that the empty can is a violation.  Now, as proof of that, you are providing wording that does not support.

[BullBuchanan]

2 minutes ago, SWATeam said:

I think the problem is that you originally stated that the empty can is a violation.  Now, as proof of that, you are providing wording that does not support.

Maybe he's been filling his quota staking out the recycling center.

Edited August 10, 2020 by BullBuchanan

[Malazan]

 

6 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

I literally gave you the section and wording of the violation in NY VTL and you’re still spewing nonsense. You’re beyond helping at this point. Your mind deeply buried in the sand.

 

You gave the law, NY VTL 1227(1). Of course, you didn't actually give the text of the law which doesn't help your interpretation.

 

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/VAT/1227#:~:text=1.,guilty of a traffic infraction.

 

Consumption or possession of alcoholic beverages in certain motor vehicles. 1. The drinking of alcoholic beverages, or the possession of an open container containing an alcoholic beverage, in a motor vehicle located upon the public highways or right-of-way public highway is prohibited. Any operator or passenger violating this section shall be guilty of a traffic infraction.

  The provisions of this section shall not be deemed to prohibit the drinking of alcoholic beverages or the possession of an open container containing an alcoholic beverage by passengers in passenger vehicles operated pursuant to a certificate or permit issued by the department of transportation or the United States department of transportation. Furthermore, the provisions of this section shall not be deemed to prohibit the possession of wine which is: (a) resealed in accordance with the provisions of subdivision four of section eighty-one of the alcoholic beverage control law; and (b) is transported in the vehicle's trunk or is transported behind the last upright seat or in an area not normally occupied by the driver or passenger in a motor vehicle that is not equipped with a trunk.

 

 

Edited August 10, 2020 by jeremy2020

[Malazan]

11 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

When we lived in SC, the law was if you couldn’t have access to drink WHILE you drive, you were OK. Put partial bottles or recycling in the trunk so they know you’re not hitting on that bottle as you drive. Also, it’s just less likely to even be discovered and become an issue. Take as many steps as possible to to avoid the question entirely. 

 

As is often the case, show some common sense and you’re probably (but not ALWAYS) going to be OK.  

 

It's not a citizen's responsibility to prevent any appearance of possibly violating a law. It is simply to follow the law. In no way, do you have to ensure the police 'don't get the wrong idea'. It is an officer's responsibility to discern whether a law has actually been broken (despite a couple court rulings saying an officer ignorant of the actual law acting in 'good faith' is justified). 

 

Now, you can say it's common sense not to have an empty can somewhere within reach of the driver to make it easier for police to discern the situation. That's an open debate, but appearance of impropriety does not violate the law. 

[BullBuchanan]

11 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

 

You gave the law, NY VTL 1227(1). Of course, you didn't actually give the text of the law which doesn't help your interpretation.

 

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/VAT/1227#:~:text=1.,guilty of a traffic infraction.

 

Consumption or possession of alcoholic beverages in certain motor vehicles. 1. The drinking of alcoholic beverages, or the possession of an open container containing an alcoholic beverage, in a motor vehicle located upon the public highways or right-of-way public highway is prohibited. Any operator or passenger violating this section shall be guilty of a traffic infraction.

  The provisions of this section shall not be deemed to prohibit the drinking of alcoholic beverages or the possession of an open container containing an alcoholic beverage by passengers in passenger vehicles operated pursuant to a certificate or permit issued by the department of transportation or the United States department of transportation. Furthermore, the provisions of this section shall not be deemed to prohibit the possession of wine which is: (a) resealed in accordance with the provisions of subdivision four of section eighty-one of the alcoholic beverage control law; and (b) is transported in the vehicle's trunk or is transported behind the last upright seat or in an area not normally occupied by the driver or passenger in a motor vehicle that is not equipped with a trunk.

 

 

So here's why Bangarang incorrectly thinks this is the law and why people like JoshAllenHasBigHands thinks that police can do whatever they want - they get away with it. It's not the law, clearly, but when they charge you for it you either have bigger problems, like a DUI, or that's it and you get a $200 fine.

In the case of the DUI, the open container is moot, and your lawyer isn't going to waste time on it. In the case of it not being a DUI, how many people are going to fight a small fine where they'll need a lawyer?

Even though you have rights, when you let cops interpret what they think the law is, and you don't challenge them on it, those rights go away in effect. 

Edited August 10, 2020 by BullBuchanan

[HamSandwhich]

29 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Yes, of course I believe that I can say no to the police. Would you let them into your house without a warrant? Would you let them search your trunk without a warrant? You have rights, and as much as they try to act like it, they aren't Kings or deities.

So you’re saying all police act like Kings and Gods? You’re part of the problem, the country is waking up to dangers of your viewpoint.  

[BullBuchanan]

Just now, HamSandwhich said:

So you’re saying all police act like Kings and Gods? You’re part of the problem, the country is waking up to dangers of your viewpoint.  

I think you have that backwards. See me after class.

[Malazan]

1 minute ago, HamSandwhich said:

So you’re saying all police act like Kings and Gods? You’re part of the problem, the country is waking up to dangers of your viewpoint.  

 

Did you make a typo? 

[Augie]

3 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

It's not a citizen's responsibility to prevent any appearance of possibly violating a law. It is simply to follow the law. In no way, do you have to ensure the police 'don't get the wrong idea'. It is an officer's responsibility to discern whether a law has actually been broken (despite a couple court rulings saying an officer ignorant of the actual law acting in 'good faith' is justified). 

 

Now, you can say it's common sense not to have an empty can somewhere within reach of the driver to make it easier for police to discern the situation. That's an open debate, but appearance of impropriety does not violate the law. 

 

As I said, that WAS THE LAW during our time in SC (after it changed from legal open containers).  If you want to argue your point with the police and tell them how you have the right and there’s nothing they can do about it, please feel free to take that on unnecessary battle and I’ll wish you all the best. Cops love getting challenged. Toss that half empty bottle of Jack Daniels in the back seat and try to argue that you couldn’t reach it from the driver’s seat. 

 

Common sense is not that common. My question is: WHY? Why not take the easy route? Just put it in the trunk and don’t run the risk of fighting that unnecessary  battle. 

[GoBills808]

Just now, BullBuchanan said:

I think you have that backwards. See me after class.

An informed citizenry is clearly the problem, we are much better served by law enforcement not knowing the law is.

[HamSandwhich]

5 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

So here's why Bangarang incorrectly thinks this is the law and why people like JoshAllenHasBigHands thinks that police can do whatever they want - they get away with it. It's not the law, clearly, but when they charge you for it you either have bigger problems, like a DUI, or that's it and you get a $200 fine.

In the case of the DUI, the open container is moot, and your lawyer isn't going to waste time on it. In the case of it not being a DUI, how many people are going to fight a small fine where they'll need a lawyer?

Even though you have rights, when you let cops interpret what they think the law is, and you don't challenge them on it, those rights go away in effect. 

Anyone can challenge the law but it needs to be done inappropriately. There’s a reason why a lot of those videos you see start and end when the “victim” is being “victimized”. They don’t want you to see what happened leading up to that point as it won’t look good for the “victim” mentality they want to sow. A little respect for authority is needed, you can have your day in court. At the point of being pulled over or being stopped by a cop is not the time to act belligerent. They’d like to go home to their families and kids too and they don’t know what you’re going to do if you’re being belligerent and will act to pacify a threat, rightfully so. Be respectful, nothing will happen to you. Is it that hard?

[Andrew Son]

1 minute ago, HamSandwhich said:

Anyone can challenge the law but it needs to be done inappropriately. There’s a reason why a lot of those videos you see start and end when the “victim” is being “victimized”. They don’t want you to see what happened leading up to that point as it won’t look good for the “victim” mentality they want to sow. A little respect for authority is needed, you can have your day in court. At the point of being pulled over or being stopped by a cop is not the time to act belligerent. They’d like to go home to their families and kids too and they don’t know what you’re going to do if you’re being belligerent and will act to pacify a threat, rightfully so. Be respectful, nothing will happen to you. Is it that hard?

Did Ed look disrespectful to you?

 

Yet he was carted off for a night in jail

[HamSandwhich]

2 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

Did you make a typo? 

What? Diety aka a God? 

[GoBills808]

1 minute ago, SWATeam said:

Did Ed look disrespectful to you?

 

Yet he was carted off for a night in jail

Shut up and comply, peasant!