aristocrat Posted January 28 Posted January 28 5 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Finish your thought then. Specific to her rape comment. How would allowing that comment in the trial help the defense? Let me hear your narrative. She thinks people think rape is sexy. Nobody thinks that. She doesn’t take rape seriously. She is out of touch with reality and the video shows that. 1
Doc Posted January 28 Posted January 28 How is it worth $83M to defame a nutjob who wasn't raped and can't even specify the year she claims she was raped?
BillStime Posted January 28 Author Posted January 28 21 minutes ago, aristocrat said: strange The only strange thing is that Trump hired the most inexperienced and least competent lawyer to defend him.
US Egg Posted January 28 Posted January 28 E.J.C. can now get back to working on jumping her dog studying 1
BillStime Posted January 28 Author Posted January 28 👆🤡 - Idiots - you get what you pay for and Conald hired an idiot. 👆🎯
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 28 Posted January 28 8 minutes ago, BillStime said: 👆🤡 - Idiots - you get what you pay for and Conald hired an idiot. 👆🎯 He did hire an idiot but let's be real she probably followed his instructions. As King Idiot everything out of her mouth was probably put there by him. She could not be THAT bad.
BillStime Posted January 28 Author Posted January 28 1 minute ago, L Ron Burgundy said: He did hire an idiot but let's be real she probably followed his instructions. As King Idiot everything out of her mouth was probably put there by him. She could not be THAT bad. Ah you’re right - King Idiot only hires the best people.
John from Riverside Posted January 28 Posted January 28 1 hour ago, BillStime said: The only strange thing is that Trump hired the most inexperienced and least competent lawyer to defend him. Didn’t surprise me at all Donald Trump is looking for at this point or people that are going to tell him what he wants to hear keep Losing Donnie
Doc Posted January 28 Posted January 28 19 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: He did hire an idiot but let's be real she probably followed his instructions. As King Idiot everything out of her mouth was probably put there by him. She could not be THAT bad. The idiot jury was going to rule against him no matter what. 1
John from Riverside Posted January 28 Posted January 28 4 minutes ago, Doc said: The idiot jury was going to rule against him no matter what. Cry more
BillStime Posted January 28 Author Posted January 28 5 minutes ago, Doc said: The idiot jury was going to rule against him no matter what. He is guilty of defamation. There's no denying that he maliciously went out of his way, as he usually does. It seems you're not pleased that "Teflon Don" has finally met his match.
ChiGoose Posted January 28 Posted January 28 1 hour ago, Doc said: The idiot jury was going to rule against him no matter what. Do you honestly believe this? Do you truly believe that an entire jury would disregard their oaths for political purposes? Do you think that a guilty verdict by a jury is based entirely on political leanings and not at all on the facts presented at trial? Because I’ve read a lot of dumb ***** from ignorant fools on this site, but it’s still hard to believe some one would be this stupid.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 28 Posted January 28 (edited) OMG. a fight started and a hockey game broke out. not predicting much scoring on the maga side.... Edited January 28 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
John from Riverside Posted January 28 Posted January 28 7 hours ago, BillStime said: He is guilty of defamation. There's no denying that he maliciously went out of his way, as he usually does. It seems you're not pleased that "Teflon Don" has finally met his match. If donnie is upset with this. Just wait till next week.
Recommended Posts