BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) Facts? For useful idiots? Thread title by useful idiot, as usual, has no relation to the facts.. I'm sure you want to be factually accurate, so it's important to note that the first jury specifically found Trump *not* liable for rape. It did, however, find him liable for sexual abuse. That finding is the foundation of the defamation campaign against Trump. If the first jury had been unable to find that Trump mistreated Carroll -- even by the low standard of proof required -- then the defamation campaign would have fallen apart. It depends on creating the legally-proven 'fact' that Trump abused Carroll. That is why I think Trump made a grievous error by not testifying in the first trial. Since this was a 25 year-old accusation that could not be proved one way or the other, his personal denial would have been important. Maybe a Manhattan jury would still have decided what it did, but Trump would at least have made his case. Edited January 27 by BillsFanNC
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) 2 hours ago, aristocrat said: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/e-jean-carroll-makes-sexual-assault-claims-against-trump-and-moonves-new-york-magazine-2019-06-21/ that's a pretty emphatic denial of events. not just the she's not my type quote you mentioned. why was the interview of her with anderson cooper not allowed in the trial? seems pretty important to the case. Did she ever say the sentence rape is sexy? Why is the interview relevant? Is your point that if a female says something you can rape or sexually abuse her? Edited January 27 by L Ron Burgundy 1
US Egg Posted January 27 Posted January 27 $83 Million? Quite a drop from what her lawyers were seeking: 1
aristocrat Posted January 27 Posted January 27 19 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Did she ever say the sentence rape is sexy? Why is the interview relevant? Is your point that if a female says something you can rape or sexually abuse her? no it causes people to question her credibility in the accusation. But you knew what I meant didn’t you?
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Posted January 27 1 minute ago, aristocrat said: no it causes people to question her credibility in the accusation. But you knew what I meant didn’t you? There is a huge difference between saying rape is sexy vs many people think rape is sexy. She's literally saying many people are f'd up. Then again no matter what someone says that doesn't mean they are eligible for rape. I've known many female comedians that make rape jokes. They don't want to be raped. You and your scum bag buddies will excuse anything he does. When he dies people that signed NDAs are gonna come out and tell their stories. And you psychos will defend him then too. 2
aristocrat Posted January 27 Posted January 27 Just now, L Ron Burgundy said: There is a huge difference between saying rape is sexy vs many people think rape is sexy. She's literally saying many people are f'd up. Then again no matter what someone says that doesn't mean they are eligible for rape. I've known many female comedians that make rape jokes. They don't want to be raped. You and your scum bag buddies will excuse anything he does. When he dies people that signed NDAs are gonna come out and tell their stories. And you psychos will defend him then too. Can you point to exactly where i said I wanted her to be raped? Or she deserves it or anything close to that? I’ll wait
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Posted January 27 1 minute ago, aristocrat said: Can you point to exactly where i said I wanted her to be raped? Or she deserves it or anything close to that? I’ll wait You didn't outright. What direction is your little defense of him going when you think this is evidence absolving Trump? If she said rape is sexy, which we know is a portion of that sentence, so what? She's not even my type......then mistakes her for an ex wife. It'd be hilarious if you shmucks didn't worship this imbecile.
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) Again LRon !@#$ stain like all the other useful idiots ignores that even a commie jury found the orange dude NOT liable for rape. Not. Liable. For. Rape. But that won't stop a useful idiot like Lron fuk.c stain.... Edited January 27 by BillsFanNC
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Posted January 27 4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Again LRon !@#$ stain like all the other useful idiots ignores that even a commie jury found the orange dude NOT liable for rape. Not. Liable. For. Rape. But that won't stop a useful idiot like Lron fuk.c stain.... Ah yes, an unsuccessful rape attempt. Much better. Let's give you a standing ovation! 1
aristocrat Posted January 27 Posted January 27 24 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: You didn't outright. What direction is your little defense of him going when you think this is evidence absolving Trump? If she said rape is sexy, which we know is a portion of that sentence, so what? She's not even my type......then mistakes her for an ex wife. It'd be hilarious if you shmucks didn't worship this imbecile. So to be clear I never mentioned it, implied in any way or anything. You made up a narrative in your mind and ran with it. Are you an insane person?
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Posted January 27 Go ahead and attack Dr. Carol Swain useful idiots. You racists. 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Posted January 27 43 minutes ago, aristocrat said: So to be clear I never mentioned it, implied in any way or anything. You made up a narrative in your mind and ran with it. Are you an insane person? Finish your thought then. Specific to her rape comment. How would allowing that comment in the trial help the defense? Let me hear your narrative.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Posted January 27 an accurate summary of the case sans silly propaganda memes and vile overtures https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4432789-e-jean-carroll-trump-legal-fight-key-moments/
Roundybout Posted January 27 Posted January 27 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Again LRon !@#$ stain like all the other useful idiots ignores that even a commie jury found the orange dude NOT liable for rape. Not. Liable. For. Rape. But that won't stop a useful idiot like Lron fuk.c stain.... Ok so just a little garden variety sexual abuse then, that’s just fine!! 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Posted January 27 6 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: ⬆️ Dance for me fuk.c. stains!!! it's interesting that this sad human's worst insult involves a moment of ecstasy enjoyed frequently by normal people but not by whoever this deviant is?
Recommended Posts