aristocrat Posted January 27 Posted January 27 7 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Have you followed this case or is this what you heard on fox news? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/e-jean-carroll-makes-sexual-assault-claims-against-trump-and-moonves-new-york-magazine-2019-06-21/ that's a pretty emphatic denial of events. not just the she's not my type quote you mentioned. why was the interview of her with anderson cooper not allowed in the trial? seems pretty important to the case.
John from Riverside Posted January 27 Posted January 27 57 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Blame the victim Sounds about right 44 minutes ago, aristocrat said: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/e-jean-carroll-makes-sexual-assault-claims-against-trump-and-moonves-new-york-magazine-2019-06-21/ that's a pretty emphatic denial of events. not just the she's not my type quote you mentioned. why was the interview of her with anderson cooper not allowed in the trial? seems pretty important to the case. You’re defending someone that can’t even tell this woman from his ex-wife 1
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Posted January 27 There's zero doubt that none of this BS ever happened. Corrupt to their core. I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat ***** 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Posted January 27 2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: There's zero doubt that none of this BS ever happened. Corrupt to their core. I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat ***** get a job loser. one other than paid liar...l. 1
John from Riverside Posted January 27 Posted January 27 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: There's zero doubt that none of this BS ever happened. Corrupt to their core. I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat ***** You are a very ugly on the inside person. Do you live in a place where people can’t stand you or do you live in a place where you ***** your sister 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Posted January 27 11 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Does that matter in any way whatsoever? If a girl is a bit odd that gives a green light to rape her? You are f'd up. Get help. They dont care. We could find out 1k things he did alongside Epstein and they would just try and explain it away. Or, they'd go the Trump route and attack the accuser or judge. These people are f'n pathetic in every way. for sure,. this is who we are up against. no conscience, no ethics, no morals. and in our favor- small brains, bad genes and little knowledge. 1
John from Riverside Posted January 27 Posted January 27 2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: for sure,. this is who we are up against. no conscience, no ethics, no morals. and in our favor- small brains, bad genes and little knowledge. It’s….a…..cult 1
Doc Posted January 27 Posted January 27 13 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: There's zero doubt that none of this BS ever happened. Corrupt to their core. I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat ***** Sounds about as legit as Blasey-Ford was. But get a bunch of TDS'ers on a jury... 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) Another thing we can glean from this thread is that these thugs also hate women. a profiler would have a field day here. Edited January 27 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
US Egg Posted January 27 Posted January 27 It was a unanimous decision by a diverse qualified jury of peers….. 1 1
BillStime Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 19 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Racist retweeting a racist.
aristocrat Posted January 27 Posted January 27 57 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Blame the victim Sounds about right You’re defending someone that can’t even tell this woman from his ex-wife so he doesn’t recognize her that means he’s guilty?
John from Riverside Posted January 27 Posted January 27 2 minutes ago, aristocrat said: so he doesn’t recognize her that means he’s guilty? This is just sad Could step in front of a camera and say that he did it so ***** what and you would come up with an excuse that’s how far down the rabbit hole you are
Recommended Posts