RVJ Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 Like to see how divided we are...I think more votes for not being traded
stuckincincy Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 I voted no, RVJ. If he leaves in '06, so be it. But he does well now, and I feel that opening up a question mark at his position in the upcoming season would be detrimental.
plenzmd1 Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 voted no(but will be like all the heads on TV) and say will not be surprised if he is
BuckeyeBill Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 Gotta keep Clements. Pay the man his money in '06.
ndirish1978 Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 yes, with the offense a the hands of a rookie QB the logical move is to weaken our defense and completely blow things (sarcasm)
Campy Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 I'm not one for the chest-thumping and lookit-me antics that Nate's prone to do, but where did the notion that he's trade-bait come from? I've seen it all over TSW but nowhere else...
stevestojan Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 i think it will be a terrible mistake to trade him9yes, i know he will be gone after next year, and you people want to trade him while he's hot, but I for one wouldn't mind winning THIS year..), but i voted yes as i think TD has something big in the mix for this weekend.
/dev/null Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 yes, with the offense a the hands of a rookie QB the logical move is to weaken our defense and completely blow things (sarcasm) 310796[/snapback] why the sarcasm? it is logical if we gut the defense and JP turns out to be a bust, we can tell ourselves it was the defense's fault if we gut the defense and JP turns out to be a stud, we can feel good about having a decent QB
Campy Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 if we gut the defense and JP turns out to be a bust, we can tell ourselves it was the defense's fault 310808[/snapback] Better yet, we'll blame either Nate for wanting out or TD for letting him out
Recommended Posts