Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If this is true and given the actions of the Washington franchise, there's some indicators that they believe it to be true..

 

I think it's an uphill battle for Snyder to keep the team. The NFL will announce an investigation that will take many months where they'll give it a chance to blow over and see if Snyder keeping the team is an option. I suspect it won't be though. 

 

For those wondering why Goodell makes the big bucks...look at this thread. People are already looking to dump this on him. He does an incredible job taking the attention away from the owners and they reward him for it. 

 

Last, but not least...the Jaguars...they seemed to have some signs on life on offense with Minshew and it looks like they're gonna have to fire Gruden and go through this scandal with Washington. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

If this is true and given the actions of the Washington franchise, there's some indicators that they believe it to be true..

 

I think it's an uphill battle for Snyder to keep the team. The NFL will announce an investigation that will take many months where they'll give it a chance to blow over and see if Snyder keeping the team is an option. I suspect it won't be though. 

 

For those wondering why Goodell makes the big bucks...look at this thread. People are already looking to dump this on him. He does an incredible job taking the attention away from the owners and they reward him for it. 

 

Last, but not least...the Jaguars...they seemed to have some signs on life on offense with Minshew and it looks like they're gonna have to fire Gruden and go through this scandal with Washington. 

 

If what is true?

 

I'm hearing a lot of different rumors.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Beast said:

 

If what is true?

 

I'm hearing a lot of different rumors.

 

 

Throw in Dirty.

 

Add in a little Juicy.

 

Bake on 350 until well done.

 

and well...even if only some of these rumors are true, it may be about done.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Beast said:

If what is true?

 

I'm hearing a lot of different rumors.

 

Yes, the rumors..about Gruden and other team personnel committing sexual harassment, benching players for sleeping with their sidepiece, etc, etc..do you genuinely not know (despite it being documented and google existing) or are you trying to do the whole "..but we don't KNOW anything" thing despite that we know they used used cheerleaders as escorts (~NY Times)? 

 

Hope this helps.

Edited by jeremy2020
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Can the NFL relegate the team to the ACC and promote Clemson into the league?

 

No Carolina will object.

Posted
26 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

Yes, the rumors..about Gruden and other team personnel committing sexual harassment, benching players for sleeping with their sidepiece, etc, etc..do you genuinely not know (despite it being documented and google existing) or are you trying to do the whole "..but we don't KNOW anything" thing despite that we know they used used cheerleaders as escorts (~NY Times)? 

 

Hope this helps.

 

It did, thanks.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

Yes, the rumors..about Gruden and other team personnel committing sexual harassment, benching players for sleeping with their sidepiece, etc, etc..do you genuinely not know (despite it being documented and google existing) or are you trying to do the whole "..but we don't KNOW anything" thing despite that we know they used used cheerleaders as escorts (~NY Times)? 

 

Hope this helps.

No need to be snarky.  There are people, myself included, who dont read the Sports section unless it is about the Buffalo Bills or maybe AFCE rivals.

 

I live in NoVA and I couldnt tell you anything about the Redskins except they have a questionable team name and beat us in SB XXVI.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

FBI?

 

 

 

The Washington Post --- the paper that ran full steam ahead on Watergate -- is hesitant to publish a story about who was diddling the secretaries at the Redskins HQ?

 

Yeah....that's believable.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

Look, I know some of you find all this titillating and interesting and we are in the ERA of COVID and out of the ERA of NEW ERA, and we may not even have a season, but can we get back to business here.

 

 

 

 

 

Flutie or Johnson? 

 

 

...and if you are tired of that, drums or flats?

 

 

 

...and if you don't know what I am talking about with the immediately above question...get out.  Seriously, leave and don't come back.  

 

 

EDIT:  Btw, you know it is a big day of NFL news when you have both Rae Carruth and OJ saying, "Holy s***, are you kidding me?!"

 

 

 

 

If you say 'ranch', there's a suspension coming.  And unlike investigations and suspensions in the NFL, at TBD they are actually served.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

The Washington Post --- the paper that ran full steam ahead on Watergate -- is hesitant to publish a story about who was diddling the secretaries at the Redskins HQ?

 

Yeah....that's believable.  


to be fair, in this instant gratification world, waiting a day to button up details Is not necessarily being scared to publish. It’s due diligence.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, NoSaint said:


to be fair, in this instant gratification world, waiting a day to button up details Is not necessarily being scared to publish. It’s due diligence.

 

Agreed....so the twitter was disingenuous and sensationalized.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

 

 

 

Now I feel like I'm being insulted lol that reads like a Mad Men fanfic

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...