All_Pro_Bills Posted July 16, 2020 Posted July 16, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, Rob's House said: HA! I FU¢KING CALLED IT! More SNL this from Norm MacDonald's book "Based on a true story". His top 25 jokes. Number 15, Earlier this week, Marlon Bramdo, met with Jewish leaders to apologize for comments he made on The Larry King Show, among them that "Hollywood is run by Jews". The Jewish leaders accepted the actor's apology and announced that Brando is now free to work again. So newly revealed Jew hater and race baiter Nick came to his senses when he realized he'd never work again if he didn't apologize. Pure and simple self-interest. Edited July 16, 2020 by All_Pro_Bills 1
Rob's House Posted July 18, 2020 Author Posted July 18, 2020 (edited) The Nick Cannon Cover-up The media has all but erased Nick Cannon's unambiguously racist statements about white people. I asked my wife if she'd heard about his situation. She hadn't so I told her to look it up. 20 minutes later, after searching Bing and Yahoo, she only knows he said blacks are the real Hebrews and that Jews control the banks and media. She has not been able to find anything about what he said about white people. EVERY article omits that part entirely. Think about why that would be. Walsh has been crushing it. https://www.dailywire.com/news/walsh-nick-cannon-just-demonstrated-that-racism-is-still-acceptable-in-america-as-long-as-its-anti-white Edited July 18, 2020 by Rob's House 2 1
Tiberius Posted July 18, 2020 Posted July 18, 2020 Jeremy Roenick sues NBC sports, says he was fired for being a straight man. He wanted to speak at RNC convention for Trump, too. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jeremy-roenick-sues-nbc-sports-224414977.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc2FicmVzcGFjZS5jb20vY29tbXVuaXR5L3RvcGljLzI4MzgyLWplcmVteS1yb2VuaWNrLXN1ZXMtbmJjLXNwb3J0cy1mb3ItYW50aS1zdHJhaWdodC1kaXNjcmltaW5hdGlvbi1pbi1maXJpbmcv&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAMZLXd32wEXIDUt3mhfhAo_Cc1CgmCpsvq13eGQvflh_G5rhq76Co-YtDZ86FNgXXrd0nHMnhCLNO9R2Ange2l9C97Ucbb4FbVa_aFkmd1HqVSAUZi6rPmw9TuUQzDevchmQ9CBh2EQBexPwJu9rnHbhm1RGs10mK4g3ehhviz8d
Tiberius Posted July 19, 2020 Posted July 19, 2020 It’s safe to come out now, no one is really fighting a war against you
Rob's House Posted July 20, 2020 Author Posted July 20, 2020 (edited) Nick Cannon Shows Us Who is Really Privileged By Gregory Hood "Media sometimes call white advocates or race realists “white supremacists,” “Nazis,” or something close to terrorists. Still, I’ve never met a white advocate who believes his skin color gives him magic powers. I’ve never even heard of any anyone who believes white people are “gods” or who thinks blacks only do evil. When it comes to who robs, rapes, kills, and fights, the evidence shows blacks do these things more often than whites. They are doing it especially enthusiastically right now because Black Lives Matter undermines police. Though whites are often victims, the melanin “soul” connection is certainly not strong enough to prevent black viciousness towards other blacks. Mr. Cannon said that whites are “closer to animals” because of our race. If a white person said this about blacks, his podcast would be banned and he would be deplatformed. ... Mr. Cannon hasn’t been “canceled.” He didn’t apologize to whites, nor was there pressure for him to do so. Fox is keeping him on the television program “Masked Singer.” His upcoming daytime program hasn’t been canceled, just delayed. Sean “Diddy” Combs offered him a job. “Charlamagne Tha God” defended him and spoke frankly about collective racial interests. No one should be surprised by this. Fifty percent of black voters have a favorable opinion of Louis Farrakhan. Mr. Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam are a black racial vanguard for their people. Blacks appreciate this. The mainstream media doesn’t, but mostly because Mr. Farrakhan keeps insulting Jews. If he didn’t, he would probably get the same welcome Al Sharpton does today. ... It’s OK to hate whites. Anyone can insult us and get away with it. That is because most whites are not racially conscious and do not defend those who speak for them. At the same time, whites suffer far greater penalties if they speak in defense of their race, sometimes especially at the hands of conservatives. White advocates face unprecedented deplatforming, legal persecution, and even physical attack. The mask is off." Edited July 20, 2020 by Rob's House 1
Rob's House Posted July 21, 2020 Author Posted July 21, 2020 https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-left-is-now-the-right 1
Doc Brown Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 On 7/16/2020 at 4:53 PM, All_Pro_Bills said: More SNL this from Norm MacDonald's book "Based on a true story". His top 25 jokes. Number 15, Earlier this week, Marlon Bramdo, met with Jewish leaders to apologize for comments he made on The Larry King Show, among them that "Hollywood is run by Jews". The Jewish leaders accepted the actor's apology and announced that Brando is now free to work again. So newly revealed Jew hater and race baiter Nick came to his senses when he realized he'd never work again if he didn't apologize. Pure and simple self-interest. By far the best Weekend Update guy. His OJ jokes alone got him fired.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 St. Louis couple charged for pulling, waving guns at protest ST. LOUIS (AP) — St. Louis’ top prosecutor on Monday charged white a husband and wife, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, with felony unlawful use of a weapon for displaying guns during a racial injustice protest outside their mansion. Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner told The Associated Press that their actions risked creating a violent situation during an otherwise nonviolent protest last month. “It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner — that is unlawful in the city of St. Louis,” Gardner said. Or should this be in the Guns or No Guns thread? Or the Anarchist thread?
The Guy In Pants Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 On 7/18/2020 at 7:01 AM, Nanker said: ***** Loony
LB3 Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 29 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: St. Louis couple charged for pulling, waving guns at protest ST. LOUIS (AP) — St. Louis’ top prosecutor on Monday charged white a husband and wife, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, with felony unlawful use of a weapon for displaying guns during a racial injustice protest outside their mansion. Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner told The Associated Press that their actions risked creating a violent situation during an otherwise nonviolent protest last month. “It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner — that is unlawful in the city of St. Louis,” Gardner said. Or should this be in the Guns or No Guns thread? Or the Anarchist thread? Honest question. Do you think the McCloskey's were in the wrong? 1
billsfan1959 Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: St. Louis couple charged for pulling, waving guns at protest ST. LOUIS (AP) — St. Louis’ top prosecutor on Monday charged white a husband and wife, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, with felony unlawful use of a weapon for displaying guns during a racial injustice protest outside their mansion. Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner told The Associated Press that their actions risked creating a violent situation during an otherwise nonviolent protest last month. “It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner — that is unlawful in the city of St. Louis,” Gardner said. Or should this be in the Guns or No Guns thread? Or the Anarchist thread? You seem to be quite upset over a couple arming themselves on their own property, in a private community. Were you as upset when people armed themselves and actually took over private and public property? Of course you weren't. Because you are an ideologue who who is incapable of entertaining any thought that is inconsistent with your mental rigidity. The slightest bit of cognitive dissonance might make your head explode. You are like one of those dolls where you pull the string on her back and she cries, except you pull your own string, over and over and over and over...continually subjecting everyone to your incessant crying and whining. Edited July 21, 2020 by billsfan1959 4
Tiberius Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 58 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said: You seem to be quite upset over a couple arming themselves on their own property, in a private community. Were you as upset when people armed themselves and actually took over private and public property? Of course you weren't. Because you are an ideologue who who is incapable of entertaining any thought that is inconsistent with your mental rigidity. The slightest bit of cognitive dissonance might make your head explode. You are like one of those dolls where you pull the string on her back and she cries, except you pull your own string, over and over and over and over...continually subjecting everyone to your incessant crying and whining. The McCloskeys were pointing the guns at people. That's crazy.
billsfan1959 Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 Just now, Tiberius said: The McCloskeys were pointing the guns at people. That's crazy. And the armed people that took over the Wendy's and surrounding area in Atlanta shot numerous people, including shooting and killing an eight year old girl. But, Yeah, what the McCloskeys did was far worse....
Tiberius Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 Just now, billsfan1959 said: And the armed people that took over the Wendy's and surrounding area in Atlanta shot numerous people, including shooting and killing an eight year old girl. But, Yeah, what the McCloskeys did was far worse.... That doesn't excuse what they did
billsfan1959 Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 Just now, Tiberius said: That doesn't excuse what they did In one instance, people are armed on their property after a mob of people break through a gate into a private community. In the other instance, people are armed, take over private and public property, shoot a number of people, and ultimately shoot and kill a little girl. And that is your answer? To turn it back to what the McCloskeys did? You have posted a number of times about the McCloskeys. Why don't you provide a link to your posts condemning the armed people that took over the Wendy's area and killed that little girl? We'll wait.
Tiberius Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 Just now, billsfan1959 said: In one instance, people are armed on their property after a mob of people break through a gate into a private community. In the other instance, people are armed, take over private and public property, shoot a number of people, and ultimately shoot and kill a little girl. And that is your answer? To turn it back to what the McCloskeys did? You have posted a number of times about the McCloskeys. Why don't you provide a link to your posts condemning the armed people that took over the Wendy's area and killed that little girl? We'll wait. I'll post what I want. You can play whataboutism all you want.
LeviF Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 The McCloskeys were absolutely in the right and frankly would have been in the right had they squeezed off a few rounds into that crowd. Don't @ me. 1
Tiberius Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 2 minutes ago, LeviF91 said: The McCloskeys were absolutely in the right and frankly would have been in the right had they squeezed off a few rounds into that crowd. Don't @ me. It's ok to point guns at people? And its a little war on whiteness if white people can't point guns at whoever they want. I bet those two eat it. They eat each others stuff. You know it
Recommended Posts