Warcodered Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 12 minutes ago, Unforgiven said: Sounds exactly like what the wannabe socialists are trying to do to people in this country right now. Sounds like you are describing looters and chaz/chop builders. Irony.
RiotAct Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 1 minute ago, Cinga said: Trump is not pulling his punches tonight! will the MSM headlines tomorrow morning start with “Trump goes on unhinged rant”, or “Trump evokes white nationalist...”? My money is on the latter. 2
Cinga Posted July 4, 2020 Author Posted July 4, 2020 1 minute ago, RiotAct said: will the MSM headlines tomorrow morning start with “Trump goes on unhinged rant”, or “Trump evokes white nationalist...”? My money is on the latter. I think it will be something to the affect of "Trump Claims Racist Memorials Off Limits To Protesters As He Threatens Dictatorial and Illegal Arrests" 1 1
Warcodered Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 15 minutes ago, Cinga said: First time I've heard her speak and she did really well, came off really sincere So you disagree with Kelo vs New London? In that decision, increasing the tax base was the reason From what little I know of it I wouldn't agree. 1 1
Cinga Posted July 4, 2020 Author Posted July 4, 2020 Just now, Warcodered said: From what little I know of it I wouldn't agree. I noticed you ignored my Daschle question too, but here you have a Democrat city that seized through Eminent Domain property belonging to Kelo, and others, mostly seniors to give it to businesses. The argument they successfully made in court was that it would increase their tax revenue. All 4 liberal justices, and Kennedy sided with New London. Noticing a pattern? 2
Warcodered Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 1 minute ago, Cinga said: I noticed you ignored my Daschle question too, but here you have a Democrat city that seized through Eminent Domain property belonging to Kelo, and others, mostly seniors to give it to businesses. The argument they successfully made in court was that it would increase their tax revenue. All 4 liberal justices, and Kennedy sided with New London. Noticing a pattern?
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 28 minutes ago, Warcodered said: I'm in general against it they'd need a damn good reason to do it. As I’m sure you’re aware, a left leaning Supreme Court ruled that eminent domain, a Constitutional provision, can be used by the the state for reasons as misguided and backwards as transferring property ownership in order to increase tax revenue on a particular property. 2 2
Warcodered Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said: As I’m sure you’re aware, a left leaning Supreme Court ruled that eminent domain, a Constitutional provision, can be used by the the state for reasons as misguided and backwards as transferring property ownership in order to increase tax revenue on a particular property. see above. and is Trump meandering around a point anytime soon?
GG Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 Just now, TakeYouToTasker said: As I’m sure you’re aware, a left leaning Supreme Court ruled that eminent domain, a Constitutional provision, can be used by the the state for reasons as misguided and backwards as transferring property ownership in order to increase tax revenue on a particular property. Or for a money-losing non existent high speed train from nowhere to nowhere. 1 1
Warcodered Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 he's going to build a park? ***** economy nah, Pandemic nah lets build a Park Our current President.
Cinga Posted July 4, 2020 Author Posted July 4, 2020 4 minutes ago, Warcodered said: You are such a typical disingenuous progressive? I gave you 2 examples of DEMOCRATS doing what you railed against. Daschle using Rushmore as a prop to stop the talk of giving it back to the Indians, and Eminent Domain abuse, and you don't see it? You're bitching about stuff YOUR GUILTY OF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Warcodered Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 Just now, Cinga said: You are such a typical disingenuous progressive? I gave you 2 examples of DEMOCRATS doing what you railed against. Daschle using Rushmore as a prop to stop the talk of giving it back to the Indians, and Eminent Domain abuse, and you don't see it? You're bitching about stuff YOUR GUILTY OF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! When were we talking about Democrats? 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 1 minute ago, Warcodered said: see above. So, the problem with “it had better be for a damn good reason” is that “damn good reason“ is wholly subjective. I think it could be effectively argued, quite easily, that from the viewpoint of the United States government in the mid-late 1800’s, the expansion of the United States was a damn good reason.
Cinga Posted July 4, 2020 Author Posted July 4, 2020 2 minutes ago, Warcodered said: When were we talking about Democrats? Reading comprehension must not be taught in school anymore huh?
bilzfancy Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 Awesome speech, we will never capitulate to the far left mob, even fair minded democrats have to agree with that 1
GG Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said: So, the problem with “it had better be for a damn good reason” is that “damn good reason“ is wholly subjective. I think it could be effectively argued, quite easily, that from the viewpoint of the United States government in the mid-late 1800’s, the expansion of the United States was a damn good reason. Boggles my mind that people who enjoy the fruits of the United States now, think that history should be reversed to fit today's narrative. 1 2
RiotAct Posted July 4, 2020 Posted July 4, 2020 2 minutes ago, GG said: Boggles my mind that people who enjoy the fruits of the United States now, think that history should be reversed to fit today's narrative. 1 2
Recommended Posts