Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

again, I do not see Roberts wanting to destroy the history of the Roberts court.

 

Roberts still only has one vote, right?  Aside from Roberts, there will be 3 Trump appointees and, what, 2 other Conservative Justices?

 

One thing has always bothered me about Trump ‘hires’.  We know from the tell-all books that he demands loyalty in his people.  Seems all but certain that anyone he has ‘hired’ has pledged some level of loyalty or at least agreement with Trump on key issues, like favoring him in the election.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Roberts still only has one vote, right?  Aside from Roberts, there will be 3 Trump appointees and, what, 2 other Conservative Justices?

 

One thing has always bothered me about Trump ‘hires’.  We know from the tell-all books that he demands loyalty in his people.  Seems all but certain that anyone he has ‘hired’ has pledged some level of loyalty or at least agreement with Trump on key issues, like favoring him in the election.

I do not believe that all those judges are in Trump's pocket.  You saw Gorsuch rule against him on the transgender case, Kavanaugh rule against him on the case about being immune from prosecution.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, oldmanfan said:

The date for the election and the date for inauguration are in the Constitution

 

28 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

The Constitution says the duly elected President is inaugurated on January 20th.  If that's Biden them Trump will be leaving the White House one way or the other.  I suspect all Republicans will support that, or else they'll lose their party for decades.

 

Exactly.  Originally, the new Congress was seated in December after the election and the President and VP didn't take office until March of the following year.  The Twentieth Amendment changed that to Congress taking office on January 3 and the President/Vice President on January 20.

 

22 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

...but what if Barr agrees with Trump’s claim that he only lost because of possible voting irregularities ?   That is the cover Trump needs to give his claim legitimacy.  It appears to many, including me, that Barr has been finding a way to favor Trump’s causes.  This is Trump’s number one cause.  

 

So asking directly, will he have support of average Republicans if Barr claims we need to look into voting irregularities?

 

The Attorney General has no standing in this issue.  In a disputed election, the new Congress sworn in on January 3 decides.   That's also specified in the 20th Amendment.  It's likely that the new Congress sworn in on January 3 will be Democratic but even if the Republicans hold on to the Senate, I think that enough Republican Senators -- perhaps even all -- will join the Democrats to give Biden the election because they care about their country and its institutions.    They don't want to turn a wannabe dictator into a actual one.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

I don't think so.  I think you'll see true republicans like Romney take the party back.  At least I hope so; having a Republican party that would go back to its roots as a party of true conservatism rather than the charade we see now would be good for the country.

 

LOL.  You're kidding, right?

 

25 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Hardcore Trumpers are maybe 29% of the electorate.  They are not taking over the country as the AOC wing will never take over the party.  The Trump legacy will hopefully be that the majority of the country that are middle right or left will demand change.

 

Maybe not take over, ,but fracture it.

Posted
1 minute ago, SoTier said:

 

 

Exactly.  Originally, the new Congress was seated in December after the election and the President and VP didn't take office until March of the following year.  The Twentieth Amendment changed that to Congress taking office on January 3 and the President/Vice President on January 20.

 

 

The Attorney General has no standing in this issue.  In a disputed election, the new Congress sworn in on January 3 decides.   That's also specified in the 20th Amendment.  It's likely that the new Congress sworn in on January 3 will be Democratic but even if the Republicans hold on to the Senate, I think that enough Republican Senators -- perhaps even all -- will join the Democrats to give Biden the election because they care about their country and its institutions.    They don't want to turn a wannabe dictator into a actual one.

 

 

 

After everything you've seen, expecting Republican Senators to become honorable sounds far-fetched to me, especially if they lose their seats.

They will dispute their losses just like Trump will.

Posted
Just now, Doc said:

 

LOL.  You're kidding, right?

 

 

Maybe not take over, ,but fracture it.

I don't think you have a clue what a true Republican looks like.  If you think its's someone who supports Trump you're wrong.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

I don't think so.  I think you'll see true republicans like Romney take the party back.  At least I hope so; having a Republican party that would go back to its roots as a party of true conservatism rather than the charade we see now would be good for the country.

 

I think that the Republicans will continue to be dominated by the Radical Right for a few more election cycles -- until they get tired of continually losing because their ideas don't resonate with most Americans -- or the party fades away and results in the rise of a new party that's fiscally conservative and socially moderate.   A lot of rank-and-file Republicans have become independents already.

 

27 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Hardcore Trumpers are maybe 29% of the electorate.  They are not taking over the country as the AOC wing will never take over the party.  The Trump legacy will hopefully be that the majority of the country that are middle right or left will demand change.

 

Trump doesn't really have a political organization; he's got a personal following made up of family and sycophants.   Trump's 2016 victory was a reflection with the American electorate's unease with the way the country was going, but he's not only failed to deliver on any of his 2016 promises, his handling of the pandemic has revealed his stupidity, incompetence and self-absorption.  Trump's supporters in the GOP have been tarred with that same brush, and as soon as it becomes clear that Covid Donnie is done -- as in Biden accumulates 271 EC votes -- GOP politicians will bail on him.

 

It's already happening.  In my Congressional district, Tom Reed, ardent Trumpster in 2016, hasn't mentioned "Trump" in his re-election bid at all.   Hell, you wouldn't even know he's a Republican.

Posted
1 hour ago, SoTier said:

 

 

Exactly.  Originally, the new Congress was seated in December after the election and the President and VP didn't take office until March of the following year.  The Twentieth Amendment changed that to Congress taking office on January 3 and the President/Vice President on January 20.

 

 

The Attorney General has no standing in this issue.  In a disputed election, the new Congress sworn in on January 3 decides.   That's also specified in the 20th Amendment.  It's likely that the new Congress sworn in on January 3 will be Democratic but even if the Republicans hold on to the Senate, I think that enough Republican Senators -- perhaps even all -- will join the Democrats to give Biden the election because they care about their country and its institutions.    They don't want to turn a wannabe dictator into a actual one.

 

 

Just hope the election goes smoothly. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, SoTier said:

 

I think that the Republicans will continue to be dominated by the Radical Right for a few more election cycles -- until they get tired of continually losing because their ideas don't resonate with most Americans -- or the party fades away and results in the rise of a new party that's fiscally conservative and socially moderate.   A lot of rank-and-file Republicans have become independents already.

 

 

 

 

Can you define radical right from a policy perspective? 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, oldmanfan said:

I don't think you have a clue what a true Republican looks like.  If you think its's someone who supports Trump you're wrong.

 

And you do and it's Romney?  OK.

 

Does any Republican here agree with this?

Edited by Doc
Posted

they sought to make fundamental (hence "radical") changes within institutions and remove from political life persons and institutions that threatened their values or economic interests.

 

Yes, I do.  If Biden wins 271 EC votes, then he's won the election.     Republican Senators, just like Democratic Senators, and voters of whatever party affiliation or not, love their country.  Moreover, politicians are always worried about their next election.   I can't see them sacrificing both their country and their careers to support an incompetent wannabe dictator whom the electorate has already rejected.

 

29 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Can you define radical right from a policy perspective? 

 

The Radical Right is made up of the extreme conservatives who want to turn the clock back to the 19th century.  Neo-liberals crossed with social Darwinists probably describes them best.  I hope that shoe doesn't fit you.  Unfortunately, it fits some Republican officeholders/candidates too well.

Posted

For those people who are concerned about Trump losing and not leaving, you should be. Why? Because there won't be anything you can do about. If your scared of this common cold epidemic, you definitely aren't going to be up for a direct conflict with the US military. You can post your complaints here of course. That will make a difference.

Posted

A poster I have set to ignore is currently the most recent commenter in 10 different threads.

Sounds like a breakdown.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Reality Check said:

For those people who are concerned about Trump losing and not leaving, you should be. Why? Because there won't be anything you can do about. If your scared of this common cold epidemic, you definitely aren't going to be up for a direct conflict with the US military. You can post your complaints here of course. That will make a difference.

That's why a great big election victory will really be great! We The People! 

 

The Military won't help Trump. Nope 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Kemp said:

A poster I have set to ignore is currently the most recent commenter in 10 different threads.

Sounds like a breakdown.

Yeah, it's annoying. I haven't opened any because I don't expect any substance from the posts, but it's never a good look when the top 8+ threads all have the same picture next to them 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Kemp said:

A poster I have set to ignore is currently the most recent commenter in 10 different threads.

Sounds like a breakdown.

  So you are for censorship.  I thought so.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RochesterRob said:

  So you are for censorship.  I thought so.

 

Wow!

 

An adult who doesn't understand what censorship even means!

 

Then again, you are a cult member.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Wow!

 

An adult who doesn't understand what censorship even means!

 

Then again, you are a cult member.

  Self created drama is a poor deflection mechanism for avoiding the truth.  Have fun in your echo chamber as the rational posters migrate elsewhere.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Self created drama is a poor deflection mechanism for avoiding the truth.  Have fun in your echo chamber as the rational posters migrate elsewhere.

No, you said something really stupid and he called you on it 

×
×
  • Create New...