Wacka Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 On 7/8/2020 at 9:14 AM, Koko78 said: You'll have to wait until the NPC downloads his next set of talking points. Updates take time! Since they use Windows, the BSOD will inactivate them!
The Guy In Pants Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, wppete said: The guy is completely Mentally Ill. No question about that. Its actually comical to see. I believe some of them to just be misinformed and suffering from legitimate confusion about what is going on. Thanks to the misinformation shoved down their throats from Hollywood etc. The others; nuts. 1
Cinga Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, The Guy In Pants said: Its like they all live in this made up little fantasy world and the rest of us are looking at them like we look at those people on acid who take their pants off start thrashing the sidewalk while singing incoherently and licking their forearms. Sounds like you hung out on Chippewa back in the 70s once too often too huh? ?? 1
The Guy In Pants Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Cinga said: Sounds like you hung out on Chippewa back in the 70s once too often too huh? ?? It’s been a long time since I’ve been back there. Edited July 21, 2020 by The Guy In Pants 1
3rdnlng Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 2 hours ago, Kemp said: He's against authoritarianism. That's enough for me. Pretty effin scary that that's not enough for everyone. I will always voice my opinion against a wannabe dictator even if some of you would be just fine with it. Hasn't Biden claimed that if he wins he will immediately dictate a nationwide command for everyone to use masks outside the home? 1 hour ago, billsfan1959 said: Yep, when Biden sponsored a successful bill that prohibited the use of federal funds for busing, he really showed us he was about an integrated multicultural society.... Nothing says "send them back" more clearly than stopping blacks from integrating.... But, just ignore reality Cut him some slack, Biden just wanted to keep his kids out of the jungle. 1
4merper4mer Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Who’d vote for that? Joe Biden advocated for it; not sure about any voting though.
Kemp Posted July 22, 2020 Author Posted July 22, 2020 22 hours ago, LB3 said: ? After three and a half years of literally not accepting election results, your party is now worried that the orange menace who constantly trolls you "might" do the same. You're precious. As an aside, stay away from the cats please. The rabbits will be fine. You're a simpleton if you think a citizen being unhappy with a President equals a man running for President who says he might officially dispute the results of an election if he is deemed to have come in 2nd place. I do know this; If that scenario occurs, Trump supporters will almost universally support him in his actions. That's because Trump supporters are a cult.
LB3 Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, Kemp said: You're a simpleton if you think a citizen being unhappy with a President equals a man running for President who says he might officially dispute the results of an election if he is deemed to have come in 2nd place. I do know this; If that scenario occurs, Trump supporters will almost universally support him in his actions. That's because Trump supporters are a cult. I said "your party", moron. Your leaders didn't accept it. You screaming harpies are just annoying. "Russia Russia Russia!" Shut up already, Jan. China does love Joe. ?? 1
Kemp Posted July 22, 2020 Author Posted July 22, 2020 22 hours ago, billsfan1959 said: Kind of like Hillary and the entire Democratic party not accepting the 2016 election results and supporting non-stop, tax payer funded, political attempts to delegitimize the election and remove Trump from office. Kinda makes all of you "wannabe dictators" Don't you ever tire of whining.... Did Hillary refuse to accept the election results? No, she gave a concession speech. Did the Dems go to the Supreme Court and file a dispute of the results? If Trump loses and accepts it, he won't give a concerssion speech. He'll ratchet up his attacks, instead, but you already know that. 1
BuffaloHokie13 Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 19 minutes ago, Kemp said: You're a simpleton if you think a citizen being unhappy with a President equals a man running for President who says he might officially dispute the results of an election if he is deemed to have come in 2nd place. I do know this; If that scenario occurs, Trump supporters will almost universally support him in his actions. That's because Trump supporters are a cult. He absolutely did not say that. Maybe you should revisit the transcript that you had me dig up. 2
TBBills Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 You cannot do this without riots and death. If he wants to keep being the worst president in the history of this country than let him try. The guy had a hard time in his alzheimer test which is a cause for concern. He is going crazy and you can see it every time he is in front of a camera... Who knows what he is saying when it isn't around.
Kemp Posted July 22, 2020 Author Posted July 22, 2020 4 minutes ago, LB3 said: I said "your party", moron. Your leaders didn't accept it. You screaming harpies are just annoying. "Russia Russia Russia!" Shut up already, Jan. China does love Joe. ?? The Dems filed a complaint with the Supreme Court? When did that happen and what were the results? If your point is that the Dems acted in a way to go against his policies, you must remember McConnell and the Republicans trying to block everything the Dems attempted, including blocking someone from becoming a Supreme Court judge because it was the 4th year of his term and that Americans should have the right to a say at the ballot box. Yet in the last few days, they are on record as saying that if an opening comes up now, they will put a Trump nominee in. Yeah, I know facts and logic are of no consequence to members of a cult. 7 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: He absolutely did not say that. Maybe you should revisit the transcript that you had me dig up. President Donald Trump is refusing to publicly commit to accepting the results of the upcoming White House election, recalling a similar threat he made weeks before the 2016 vote, as he scoffs at polls showing him lagging behind Democrat Joe Biden. Trump says it’s too early to make such an ironclad guarantee. “I have to see. Look ... I have to see,” Trump told moderator Chris Wallace during a wide-ranging interview on “Fox News Sunday.” “No, I’m not going to just say yes. I’m not going to say no, and I didn’t last time either.” 2
BuffaloHokie13 Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 4 minutes ago, Kemp said: President Donald Trump is refusing to publicly commit to accepting the results of the upcoming White House election, recalling a similar threat he made weeks before the 2016 vote, as he scoffs at polls showing him lagging behind Democrat Joe Biden. Trump says it’s too early to make such an ironclad guarantee. “I have to see. Look ... I have to see,” Trump told moderator Chris Wallace during a wide-ranging interview on “Fox News Sunday.” “No, I’m not going to just say yes. I’m not going to say no, and I didn’t last time either.” I like how you conveniently leave out that this response was within a line of questions that sprouted from his concerns about mail in voting and fraud. 2
LB3 Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Kemp said: The Dems filed a complaint with the Supreme Court? When did that happen and what were the results? If your point is that the Dems acted in a way to go against his policies, you must remember McConnell and the Republicans trying to block everything the Dems attempted, including blocking someone from becoming a Supreme Court judge because it was the 4th year of his term and that Americans should have the right to a say at the ballot box. Yet in the last few days, they are on record as saying that if an opening comes up now, they will put a Trump nominee in.Yeah, I know facts and logic are of no consequence to members of a cult. Thankfully you're mostly feelz. Edited July 22, 2020 by LB3
Kemp Posted July 22, 2020 Author Posted July 22, 2020 1 minute ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: I like how you conveniently leave out that this response was within a line of questions that sprouted from his concerns about mail in voting and fraud. He is on record as saying he might not accept a defeat and might dispute it. That is exactly what I wrote he said. Name another defeated President who ever said or did something similar. 1 minute ago, LB3 said: Thankfully you're mostly feelz. I always enjoy when a Trump supporter is pushed into a corner and cannot dispute facts. All that's left is to try and fail at being funny. Amazing how often this happens. 1
LB3 Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, Kemp said: He is on record as saying he might not accept a defeat and might dispute it. That is exactly what I wrote he said. Name another defeated President who ever said or did something similar. I always enjoy when a Trump supporter is pushed into a corner and cannot dispute facts. All that's left is to try and fail at being funny. Amazing how often this happens. Trying to impeach for 3 1/2 years sure seems like acceptance to me. I didn't dispute that McConnell will nominate if given the chance this year. It's great. It'll save the courts for decades from far left nutbags like you.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 8 minutes ago, Kemp said: He is on record as saying he might not accept a defeat and might dispute it. That is exactly what I wrote he said. Name another defeated President who ever said or did something similar. Are you implying that if fraud is suspected we should simply accept the results anyway? We literally had a several month investigation into whether he willingly sought out and received foreign assistance last election. You may not realize it, but the mail in voting could backfire completely for the democrats.
3rdnlng Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 4 hours ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Are you implying that if fraud is suspected we should simply accept the results anyway? We literally had a several month year investigation into whether he willingly sought out and received foreign assistance last election. You may not realize it, but the mail in voting could backfire completely for the democrats. FIFY 1
Recommended Posts