.. and just like that, another thread goes poof

[GG]

Before a certain someone nuked another thread where facts proved him wrong, he made a public plea to the site owner about another poster.   Given the propensity of a certain poster under a bunch of different user accounts to start incendiary threads, which are then deleted when proven wrong, here's the operative passage in the ToS:

 

Personal "crusades" (posting the same information/opinion in an excessively repetitive manner. We want posters to share opinions not bludgeon others to death with them.) 

[Numark3]

What thread was deleted?

[GG]

Just now, Crayola64 said:

What thread was deleted?

 

The one whose title took up half the page

[B-Man]

Just now, Jaraxxus said:

 

Little Gary's thread on the fraudulent Russia hit contract bollocks.

 

 

 

Yeah, but as the false rumor did nationwide, it served its purpose.

 

?

[Hedge]

[wppete]

They silence what they don't like. 

 

Edited June 29, 2020 by wppete

[shoshin]

Crusades are illegal? Any other nominees for banning on this ground or just the one?

 

There are a very small handful of people who try for discourse at PPP. But it’s mostly just a regression to a mean here lead by the name callers and ***** posters. 
 

PPP was a good idea whose time has past. There are plenty of outlets for political speech. The idea that this is a pressure release is a silly metaphor. TBD would be just fine without it. 

 

There are a few threads where discussion attempts to break out and even civil discourse but name calling and trolling usually intrudes even for those. It’s on the whole a negative drain on the community. 

Edited June 29, 2020 by shoshin

[BillStime]

Don't you wish the

8 minutes ago, GG said:

Before a certain someone nuked another thread where facts proved him wrong, he made a public plea to the site owner about another poster.   Given the propensity of a certain poster under a bunch of different user accounts to start incendiary threads, which are then deleted when proven wrong, here's the operative passage in the ToS:

 

Personal "crusades" (posting the same information/opinion in an excessively repetitive manner. We want posters to share opinions not bludgeon others to death with them.) 

 

If only the issues that constantly haunt Trump could go poof, right?

[GG]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

Don't you wish the

 

If only the issues that constantly haunt Trump could go poof, right?

 

Here's something that wasn't a lie.  Did you enjoy the dance?

 

[Hedge]

1 minute ago, shoshin said:

Crusades are illegal? Any other nominees for banning on this ground or just the one?

 

There are a very small handful of people who try here. But it’s mostly just a regression to a mean here lead by the name callers and ***** posters. 
 

PPP was a good idea whose time has past. There are plenty of outlets for political speech. The idea that this is a pressure release is a silly metaphor. TBD would be just fine without it. 

 

There are a few threads where discussion attempts to break out and even civil discourse but name calling usually breaks out even there. 

 

Then leave. Problem solved for you. But you aren't content with that, are you? You just call to shut it down and impose your vision of virtue on all. What a good little anti-fascist!

[Rob's House]

3 minutes ago, shoshin said:

Crusades are illegal? Any other nominees for banning on this ground or just the one?

 

There are a very small handful of people who try for discourse at PPP. But it’s mostly just a regression to a mean here lead by the name callers and ***** posters. 
 

PPP was a good idea whose time has past. There are plenty of outlets for political speech. The idea that this is a pressure release is a silly metaphor. TBD would be just fine without it. 

 

There are a few threads where discussion attempts to break out and even civil discourse but name calling and trolling usually intrudes even for those. It’s on the whole a negative drain on the community. 

 

Very little name calling goes on here, and when it does it's usually accompanied by an argument.

 

If someone hurts your feelings just put them on ignore.

[meazza]

2 minutes ago, shoshin said:

Crusades are illegal? Any other nominees for banning on this ground or just the one?

 

There are a very small handful of people who try for discourse at PPP. But it’s mostly just a regression to a mean here lead by the name callers and ***** posters. 
 

PPP was a good idea whose time has past. There are plenty of outlets for political speech. The idea that this is a pressure release is a silly metaphor. TBD would be just fine without it. 

 

There are a few threads where discussion attempts to break out and even civil discourse but name calling usually breaks out even there. 

 

The name calling has been a norm here since this forum started but the two main catalysts for a ban in my opinion should be:

 

1) Posting offensive and violent imagery (such posters have already been banned)

2) Crusades where one starts tons of threads with no real purpose.

 

If anyone feels the need to add, go ahead.

[BillStime]

Just now, GG said:

 

Here's something that wasn't a lie.  Did you enjoy the dance?

 

 

What was as lie?

[GG]

Just now, meazza said:

 

 

2) Crusades where one starts tons of threads with no real purpose.

 

 

 

 and then deletes the thread when his ass is handed to him.

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

What was as lie?

 

Uhm the Russia story you've been pimping for 2 days. 

[RochesterRob]

1 minute ago, Rob's House said:

 

Very little name calling goes on here, and when it does it's usually accompanied by an argument.

 

If someone hurts your feelings just put them on ignore.

  It's very surprising that there is not more open hostility aside from a certain poster who takes the name of a Roman emperor.

[BillStime]

Just now, GG said:

 

Uhm the Russia story you've been pimping for 2 days. 

 

You wouldn't be here if you had concrete proof that it was a lie... but keep spinning

 

[Koko78]

11 minutes ago, shoshin said:

PPP was a good idea whose time has past. There are plenty of outlets for political speech. The idea that this is a pressure release is a silly metaphor. TBD would be just fine without it.

 

Feel free to ***** off out of PPP then.

[wnyguy]

4 minutes ago, shoshin said:

Crusades are illegal? Any other nominees for banning on this ground or just the one?

 

There are a very small handful of people who try for discourse at PPP. But it’s mostly just a regression to a mean here lead by the name callers and ***** posters. 
 

PPP was a good idea whose time has past. There are plenty of outlets for political speech. The idea that this is a pressure release is a silly metaphor. TBD would be just fine without it. 

 

There are a few threads where discussion attempts to break out and even civil discourse but name calling and trolling usually intrudes even for those. It’s on the whole a negative drain on the community. 

 

 

While I agree that the name calling and personal attacks are a bit much to take I really like this forum. I find lots of informative posts from both sides of the aisle and some posts have really opened my eyes about a few things.

[GG]

Just now, BillStime said:

 

You wouldn't be here if you had concrete proof that it was a lie... but keep spinning

 

 

As opposed to an empty claim in the initial reporting, which got shot down?

 

Who wears the corsage at your grave dances?

[BillStime]

Just now, GG said:

 

As opposed to an empty claim in the initial reporting, which got shot down?

 

Who wears the corsage at your grave dances?

 

Please post your proof that the story is fake... we will wait.