Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: As a Trump fiction. Oh I see. So you DO think they are an invention of Trump. Care to elaborate?
SectionC3 Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Oh I see. So you DO think they are an invention of Trump. Care to elaborate? Not really. Trump’s track record of lies speaks for itself.
Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: Not really. Trump’s track record of lies speaks for itself. Soooo what exactly are they? You are all over the place. Seriously. How would you define the organization?
SectionC3 Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 16 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Soooo what exactly are they? You are all over the place. Seriously. How would you define the organization? With respect to your (poorly-phrased) first question, I assume “they” refers to Trump’s lies. Like I said, they speak for themselves.
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 Alternate Title: Life With Chef Jim 2 2
Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 58 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: With respect to your (poorly-phrased) first question, I assume “they” refers to Trump’s lies. Like I said, they speak for themselves. Sorry you're having trouble following. It was right in my second sentence who the "They" was I was referring. You must be real busy sussing out all those Hoaxes so I understand. Anyway the "They" I referring to was ANTIFA. So you truly think that ANTIFA is all in the imagination of Trump. If you don't how would you define them?
Tiberius Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 50 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: Alternate Title: Life With Chef Jim Perfect!
SectionC3 Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 23 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Sorry you're having trouble following. It was right in my second sentence who the "They" was I was referring. You must be real busy sussing out all those Hoaxes so I understand. Anyway the "They" I referring to was ANTIFA. So you truly think that ANTIFA is all in the imagination of Trump. If you don't how would you define them? Sorry. Under usual rules of grammar, “they” pertains to a plural reference. Which is why it seems pretty clear you referred to Trump’s lies. Had you intended to reference Anti-Fa, you would have asked whether “it” is an invention of Trump. And you want to be my financial adviser. 1
Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 (edited) 28 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Sorry. Under usual rules of grammar, “they” pertains to a plural reference. Which is why it seems pretty clear you referred to Trump’s lies. Had you intended to reference Anti-Fa, you would have asked whether “it” is an invention of Trump. And you want to be my financial adviser. When you've lost an argument you discuss grammar. And I'm not asking if IT is an invention of Trump because they are not. I'm asking YOU how you would define IT? And now that I think about it I would love to be your advisor. Reason is firing you would be the height of my day. Edited September 17, 2020 by Chef Jim
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 1 hour ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: Alternate Title: Life With Chef Jim
SectionC3 Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 1 hour ago, Chef Jim said: When you've lost an argument you discuss grammar. And I'm not asking if IT is an invention of Trump because they are not. I'm asking YOU how you would define IT? And now that I think about it I would love to be your advisor. Reason is firing you would be the height of my day. I self-manage my money. I don’t take advice on securities from guys who went from the world of food preparation to the financial industry. Kind of has a “used car salesman” vibe to it, so I leave that kind of stuff to the pros. Or I just do it myself. FYI: “It” is a singular reference, and “they” is a plural reference. So if you meant to refer to Anti-Fa earlier, you should have said “it.” Your use of “they” pointed to Trump’s lies. Those lies, of course, are myriad and speak for themselves. And Anti-Fa is just another one of your hoaxes. So there’s that. 1
Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 40 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: I self-manage my money. I don’t take advice on securities from guys who went from the world of food preparation to the financial industry. Kind of has a “used car salesman” vibe to it, so I leave that kind of stuff to the pros. Or I just do it myself. FYI: “It” is a singular reference, and “they” is a plural reference. So if you meant to refer to Anti-Fa earlier, you should have said “it.” Your use of “they” pointed to Trump’s lies. Those lies, of course, are myriad and speak for themselves. And Anti-Fa is just another one of your hoaxes. So there’s that. You don't take advice on securities from guys on the internet? That's good. Just so you know, I have not, nor will I ever, give you any advice on securities over the internet. And speaking of securities advice. You STILL don't know what I do which is embarrassing for you. I wish you luck and hope you don't make any more stupid mistakes with your plan. Hmmm I have not brought up Trump's lies in this conversation so I'm not sure why you keep bringing it up. Wait, I know why. You don't know how to answer my question of how you would define ANIFA without coming off as an idiot. So to keep from looking like an idiot in your mine you come across as an idiot in everyone else's mind. So I'll ask one last time. How would you define ANTIFA? Why do you consider it a hoax? Stop being boring. And I'm being kind.....for now.
Q-baby! Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 2 hours ago, Chef Jim said: When you've lost an argument you discuss grammar. And I'm not asking if IT is an invention of Trump because they are not. I'm asking YOU how you would define IT? And now that I think about it I would love to be your advisor. Reason is firing you would be the height of my day. 😂 You don’t fire someone who pays you. That’s called quitting. Man, you have a warped self worth. Probably because you were one of those chefs that thought they were the boss. You are making my food, I am the boss! Oh and get back in the ***** kitchen, I came to have dinner, not to meet the staff!
Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: 😂 You don’t fire someone who pays you. That’s called quitting. Man, you have a warped self worth. Probably because you were one of those chefs that thought they were the boss. You are making my food, I am the boss! Oh and get back in the ***** kitchen, I came to have dinner, not to meet the staff! You absolutely fire someone who pays you. If they don't follow my advice I don't give a flying ***** how much they pay me. I kick them to the curb. I don't need them. They need me. That is the epitome of self worth. But I understand why you don't get that. 1
Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 3 hours ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: Alternate Title: Life With Chef Jim Good one. LOL I'm just looking for clarification on points you all make. Funny how you guys don't respond to those questions. You attack me , ignore me, or change the subject. Why (HA!) is that I wonder?
Q-baby! Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 7 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: You absolutely fire someone who pays you. If they don't follow my advice I don't give a flying ***** how much they pay me. I kick them to the curb. I don't need them. They need me. That is the epitome of self worth. But I understand why you don't get that. They don’t need you. You guys are a dime a dozen! Oh, I get it. That’s why I no longer have to work for a living. 😁 1
SectionC3 Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Chef Jim said: You don't take advice on securities from guys on the internet? That's good. Just so you know, I have not, nor will I ever, give you any advice on securities over the internet. And speaking of securities advice. You STILL don't know what I do which is embarrassing for you. I wish you luck and hope you don't make any more stupid mistakes with your plan. Hmmm I have not brought up Trump's lies in this conversation so I'm not sure why you keep bringing it up. Wait, I know why. You don't know how to answer my question of how you would define ANIFA without coming off as an idiot. So to keep from looking like an idiot in your mine you come across as an idiot in everyone else's mind. So I'll ask one last time. How would you define ANTIFA? Why do you consider it a hoax? Stop being boring. And I'm being kind.....for now. Uh oh. I'd hate to see you if you were more triggered than you are now! Also, I don't really care what you do for a living. You're an internet rando. I wish you health, happiness, and success. But I don't particularly care to learn the nature of your profession. Our repartee is one where I say something, you get mad, I laugh, and we move on. That's it. 55 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: You absolutely fire someone who pays you. If they don't follow my advice I don't give a flying ***** how much they pay me. I kick them to the curb. I don't need them. They need me. That is the epitome of self worth. But I understand why you don't get that. Would you fire someone who disagreed with you on a different matter? Like, say the head of Antifa came to you and needed some sage advice. Would you take him or her on as a client? I'm trying to gauge your prowess and the depth of your expertise in whatever field it is that you're in. Edited September 17, 2020 by SectionC3
Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 51 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: They don’t need you. You guys are a dime a dozen! Oh, I get it. That’s why I no longer have to work for a living. 😁 What guys are a dime a dozen? Tell me oh wise one. What do I do for a living?
Chef Jim Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 12 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Uh oh. I'd hate to see you if you were more triggered than you are now! Also, I don't really care what you do for a living. You're an internet rando. I wish you health, happiness, and success. But I don't particularly care to learn the nature of your profession. Our repartee is one where I say something, you get mad, I laugh, and we move on. That's it. You make me angry? Nah, ya bore me. It is hilarious that you throw out the Rule #2 but you rarely follow it yourself. Hence the boredom. 14 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Would you fire someone who disagreed with you on a different matter? Like, say the head of Antifa came to you and needed some sage advice. Would you take him or her on as a client? I'm trying to gauge your prowess and the depth of your expertise in whatever field it is that you're in. No I wouldn't fire them. I'd not bring them aboard in the first place. What does decision on who I help have to do with the depth of my experience? Show a lot more about my character than my expertise. Wouldn't you agree? So you are a troll and have no desire to discuss the topic at hand which was "how would you define ANTIFA as an organization and why do you consider them a hoax?" And why are you constantly changing the subject? What's the matter Colonel Sanders........chicken?
SectionC3 Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 7 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: You make me angry? Nah, ya bore me. It is hilarious that you throw out the Rule #2 but you rarely follow it yourself. Hence the boredom. No I wouldn't fire them. I'd not bring them aboard in the first place. What does decision on who I help have to do with the depth of my experience? Show a lot more about my character than my expertise. Wouldn't you agree? So you are a troll and have no desire to discuss the topic at hand which was "how would you define ANTIFA as an organization and why do you consider them a hoax?" And why are you constantly changing the subject? What's the matter Colonel Sanders........chicken? I'm gonna have to rule #2 your representation with spec to "the topic at hand."
Recommended Posts