Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

That was my post.

 

and it is indeed Warren Zevon

 

IMG_0245.jpg

well there goes THAT....my apologies I thought it was at least a plausible explanation for a ban if that had occurred. I dont like bans I think they should be a last resort after warnings. I'll edit my original posting. Thank you for this.

 

edted my OP. 

Edited by Muppy
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

I find it amazing anything can get you banned- I was called a racist in the football side of things for saying that I think 10 years from now JA will be better than Lamar. That poster to my knowledge did not even get warning, but I guess there must be a line somewhere.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Muppy said:

well there goes THAT....my apologies I thought it was at least a plausible explanation for a ban if that had occurred. I dont like bans I think they should be a last resort after warnings. I'll edit my original posting. Thank you for this.

 

edted my OP. 

I think erroneous predictive ban hypothesis modeling is, in and of itself, ban worthy. 

 

On the other hand, scrubbing the aforementioned hypothethis to make it appear as if it never happened is, however, acceptable and preferable in the current sociopolitical climate, so I think banning you could create unforeseen liability issues. 

 

I am torn on how to proceed and wish not to hurt any feelings. Let's get feedback from @Koko78, attorney extraordinaire, resident legal meanie and fat shamer.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, New Improved DC Tom said:

Forgot I had this account...

 

Now you see why I left this shithole.

you're an idiot.

hello2.gif.2ff1fa85a8cba594d06b58430dbbb8e9.gif

Edited by Foxx
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, New Improved DC Tom said:

Forgot I had this account...

 

Now you see why I left this shithole.

 

f80a2838170334ce1d9ddcb6da14b272.jpg

 

Lots of new (bad) posters.

 

DC Tom had a very specific posting style, we should be able to tell pretty easily.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
24 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

f80a2838170334ce1d9ddcb6da14b272.jpg

 

Lots of new (bad) posters.

 

DC Tom had a very specific posting style, we should be able to tell pretty easily.

 

 

 

And certainly would never suggest he could be improved upon. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

I like DR, but he was trending down lately, so I'm not surprised this happened. It was noticeable that the PPP was getting to him.

 

Most of the posters in this forum just feed off the sensationalism and can't have a worthwhile discussion. DR is one of the good ones and I'll be happy if he comes back.

Posted
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I think erroneous predictive ban hypothesis modeling is, in and of itself, ban worthy. 

 

On the other hand, scrubbing the aforementioned hypothethis to make it appear as if it never happened is, however, acceptable and preferable in the current sociopolitical climate, so I think banning you could create unforeseen liability issues. 

 

I am torn on how to proceed and wish not to hurt any feelings. Let's get feedback from @Koko78, attorney extraordinaire, resident legal meanie and fat shamer.

 

Well, chubby, res ipsa loquitur.

20 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

I like DR, but he was trending down lately, so I'm not surprised this happened. It was noticeable that the PPP was getting to him.

 

Most of the posters in this forum just feed off the sensationalism and can't have a worthwhile discussion. DR is one of the good ones and I'll be happy if he comes back.

 

I hope he comes back. Found his theories interesting, though I did not necessarily agree with all of his conclusions.

Posted
20 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

I like DR, but he was trending down lately, so I'm not surprised this happened. It was noticeable that the PPP was getting to him.

 

Most of the posters in this forum just feed off the sensationalism and can't have a worthwhile discussion. DR is one of the good ones and I'll be happy if he comes back.

Trends are like warts.  The content of your character is what you should be proud of.  I for one, believe that censorship and measuring anything based on a "trend" is so trendy.

Posted
Just now, realtruelove said:

Trends are like warts.  The content of your character is what you should be proud of.  I for one, believe that censorship and measuring anything based on a "trend" is so trendy.

Eh...

 

Not dissing DR, but it might say something about your character if you let this place get to you. Or just says that you need a break.

Posted
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I think erroneous predictive ban hypothesis modeling is, in and of itself, ban worthy. 

 

On the other hand, scrubbing the aforementioned hypothethis to make it appear as if it never happened is, however, acceptable and preferable in the current sociopolitical climate, so I think banning you could create unforeseen liability issues. 

 

I am torn on how to proceed and wish not to hurt any feelings. Let's get feedback from @Koko78, attorney extraordinaire, resident legal meanie and fat shamer.

lol I plan on banning myself (instead of voting for)  no begging me to stay ........:snicker:

 

:couch:  ?

Posted (edited)

I believe you get a little more leeway depending on your political affiliation on these boards but they are privately owned so those are the breaks. 

Edited by Beast
Posted
1 hour ago, New Improved DC Tom said:

Forgot I had this account...

 

Now you see why I left this shithole.

now in true PPP form I'm going to assume this is Deranged Rhino with a sock puppet account...OR DC Tom Himself was a sock puppet.......OR New Improved DC Tom really IS Newly Improved DC Tom...or Not.

 

lol as the chatroom turns.

 

Welcome Back. or Welcome to PPP .signed muppy the same as she ever was...or at least before Margarita errrr Muppy thr same as she ever was...? . Hahaha sometimes you've just gotta laugh..

Posted
2 hours ago, New Improved DC Tom said:

Forgot I had this account...

 

Now you see why I left this shithole.

Welcome back.

 

I didn't notice DR got banned for calling out a disingenuous ass. I am furious about this. DR threads and posts were/are a wealth of information and so far many of the  things he has reported have been proven true.

 

Mods went too far on this.

Posted
3 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

I like DR, but he was trending down lately, so I'm not surprised this happened. It was noticeable that the PPP was getting to him.

 

Most of the posters in this forum just feed off the sensationalism and can't have a worthwhile discussion. DR is one of the good ones and I'll be happy if he comes back.

Interesting. What 'sensationalism' as an example?  

 

Agree on DR. 

Posted
1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Interesting. What 'sensationalism' as an example?  

 

Agree on DR. 

Posters here constantly quote the MSM. They love it. Bolded headlines and series of empty posts. Everything is dramatized to the nth degree.

Posted
12 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

As near as I can figure, DR apparently started some thread attacking Gary. The mods, who have apparently forgotten their declarations of not moderating PPP, moderated PPP and banned him for a month based on whatever happened in that thread.

 

That or aliens.

 

That and forgetting/ignoring the many threads started by a few recently active posters that were purely personal attacks.

 

On the main board it's become evident over the years that the no-politics rule is interpreted differently depending on your politics, so it's hard to ignore the strong possibility of that mentality seeping over here.  I guess the Rubicon has finally been crossed.

  • Sad 1
Posted

It is a shame that DR, who has done yeoman work here and deserves our own Pulitzer Prize, has been what I presume put on vacation for a month. If it was because of any interaction with Gary or Warren or Peaceout, etc. who is the original lowlife clown and bitchmudgeon then it is even more of a shame. I can remember a time when we were somewhat more moderated here and a poster from the past who has just recently returned, claimed that he was about to get banned. Although his politics were diametrically opposed to those of us who are considered on the right, most every one of us posted strong objections to him suffering a ban just because his opinions were asinine. We strongly objected to any gag being placed on free speech.@Gene Frenkledo you remember that and how do you feel about this matter today?

 

I don't know what DR did but it seems way out of character for him to have done anything deserving a ban. I have noticed that a few newer posters here have ganged up with a few of the older posters and incessantly stalked and harassed DR. Somehow something just doesn't feel right. 

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...