Who will be the next Republican Standard Bearer for 2024?

[Magox]

5 minutes ago, Cinga said:

with Laura Ingraham as VP? 

 

Kidding aside, I don't think there is anyone who is more in tune with the anger and dissatisfaction with what we are seeing today than Tucker Carlson.

 

He has been ???

[Azalin]

Nikki Haley - she's popular in the party, has legislative and executive experience, and strong international affairs background. She has no major gaffes or scandals that I know of, has a good relationship with the press, and can be strong and direct without coming off like an unholy B word. If she wants it, I think the 2024 nomination is hers to lose.

 

If I had to pick a candidate based solely on my personal preferences, it would be Crenshaw.  

[Taro T]

Purely guessing that it would be Crenshaw or Haley, but preference would be Grenell.  

[Doc Brown]

1 hour ago, TtownBillsFan said:

Are you kidding?  Have you heard Cruz speak/read his tweets?  He's an outspoken voice, and rails against the media.  I voted for him in the general, and as some others here have said, I abstained in the presidential election this last time.  Trump will get my vote this time, and I'm hoping to have the opportunity to vote for Cruz again.

His dad shooting JFK might be a liability.

[fansince88]

9 hours ago, Joe Miner said:

I'll take some of these:

 

 

 

Stefanik is in my district.  When we first elected her she went by way of the establishment. Trump was the best thing to happen to her and helped her become her own voice. She has matured so much in the last year

[Cinga]

1 hour ago, Magox said:

 

Kidding aside, I don't think there is anyone who is more in tune with the anger and dissatisfaction with what we are seeing today than Tucker Carlson.

 

He has been ???

Agreed, he does an amazing job getting even libs to come on his show, I guess they figure they can outsmart him, but he leads the questioning so well, it ultimately makes them look the fool they are.

Well deserving of that 8 o'clock slot.

[Cinga]

10 hours ago, Joe Miner said:

I'll take some of these:

 

 

 

 

My wife has disagreed with a woman ever being POTUS because of that whole PMS and menopause thing and living with her all these years, I might tend to agree. ?

However, this is a pretty amazing lineup that even the wife might be able to get behind.

[SectionC3]

12 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

I'm all in on Kaleigh Mcenany.

cork deep I imagine. 

[B-Man]

   

[Mark Vader]

On 6/24/2020 at 7:12 AM, Joe Miner said:

I'll take some of these:

 

 

 

I recognize Nikki Haley.

 

Who are the other three? Is the last picture of McEnany?

[Joe Miner]

The last is McEnany.

 

The second is Elise Stefanik.

 

The third is Kristi Noem.

[Buffalo_Gal]

8 minutes ago, Mark Vader said:

I recognize Nikki Haley.

 

Who are the other three? Is the last picture of McEnany?

1) Nikki Haley
2) Elise Stefanik
3) Kristi Noem
4) Kayleigh McEnany

[Magox]

I would imagine that the outcome of the elections would greatly influence whoever the nominee will be in 2024.

 

Things are looking pretty bad for Trump at this stage, things can change of course but if Trump were to lose he would still cast a huge shadow over the field.

 

I could easily see all the establishment like and even non Trump conservatives dump him like a bad habit if he were to lose.  But even if that were the case, Trump probably would still have a significant influence over the primary process.  I think most of the field would kiss the ring and look for his endorsement.    

 

Trump loses, I could see that giving more of an edge to Nikki Haley, Scott or Rubio.   

 

If he wins, then whoever Trump endorses would win the nomination.  Pence, DeSantis, Cotton or Cruz?

 

[Buffalo_Gal]

Bye Nikki
 

 

[Magox]

Definitely an out of step take from Nikki but hardly an unforgivable one.  

 

Some of these politicians are not in tune with the base and that tweet strikes me as tone deaf.

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

I see that statement as alright.

 

Having Lawyers and bureaucrats making speech laws is ALWAYS a bad thing...........anti-over regulation is a good thing.

 

but she offers no alternative to allowing these social stages enforcing their own anti-conservative censorship, that is a mistake.

 

 

 

 

[Artful Dodger]

On 6/24/2020 at 2:43 PM, Doc Brown said:

Nicky Haley.  I haven't seen the "it" factor with a politician since Obama came onto the scene in '04 until now.  She's one of the few who worked for Trump, stood up to him several times, and left on good graces. 

 

I like her as well.  Executive experience, foreign policy experience, and her nomination would also make it very difficult for the Democrats and the national media to scream "racism."

[Koko78]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

I see that statement as alright.

 

Having Lawyers and bureaucrats making speech laws is ALWAYS a bad thing...........anti-over regulation is a good thing.

 

but she offers no alternative to allowing these social stages enforcing their own anti-conservative censorship, that is a mistake.

 

I'm not sure that the middle ground needs to be left in the hands of lawyers and bureaucrats.

 

If a website wants to arbitrarily apply its rules to censor certain types of speech while ignoring rule violations they agree with, then they deserve to lose their legal protections for being a publisher.

 

If they apply their rules fairly and evenly, then they should be protected as providers.

[T master]

If Tim Scott continues to bring up points like he did on the senate floor the other day i think he would get my vote !

[SoTier]

What?  No Trump in the poll?