TakeYouToTasker Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 14 minutes ago, GregPersons said: Every time I challenge a different poster, I seem to gain a new identity. This is the 16th identity I've been ascribed and I can't wait to find out more. Seems like you guys are getting new challengers on a regular basis and it's inconceivable they're different people. (I think it's part of the "paid protestors" idea — y'all are so delusional, you have no idea how many people ***** hate your guts) Do you think language has fixed meanings? Where do you think language comes from? Do you think there is a Language God who gives us new words every few years? Very curious how "the mutability of language" is not something you are capable of understanding... especially when you do have posts that come up when searching "White genocide"!!!!! Quoted from the other thread because I’m not going to type the same thing out twice. To your point about language evolving, while that is true that’s not what’s happening here. Evolutionary change is organic, and happens gradually over a long period of time. It is also generally rejected by linguists because the meaning of words is essential to idea sharing and communication. People attempting to abruptly force feed starkly different new meanings to commonly understood words, who then attempt to use those words as political clubs in order to bully people into accepting Marxist dogma are #######s of the highest order who should be soundly rejected as dishonest at best, and evil at worst. With that said, are there certain genocides you find acceptable? Stack rank your genocides for me with those you find most acceptable at the top, and those more reprehensible at the bottom. The Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, the Holodomor, the Rape of Nanking, the Serbian Problem in Croatia, the Partition of India, the Biafra, the Killing Fields, the Burundian Genocide, and lastly the blossoming genocide in South Africa. Thanks in advance.
GregPersons Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: So by saying I'm not racists is proof I'm not racist? Did I get that right? Close. Your certainty that you could not be racist is what proves you are racist. Yes. Do you think you can figure out why that is? Hint: It is what is in all of your posts, and what I have repeatedly describes as the "oxygen" of racism. 3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Quoted from the other thread because I’m not going to type the same thing out twice. To your point about language evolving, while that is true that’s not what’s happening here. Evolutionary change is organic, and happens gradually over a long period of time. It is also generally rejected by linguists because the meaning of words is essential to idea sharing and communication. People attempting to abruptly force feed starkly different new meanings to commonly understood words, who then attempt to use those words as political clubs in order to bully people into accepting Marxist dogma are #######s of the highest order who should be soundly rejected as dishonest at best, and evil at worst. With that said, are there certain genocides you find acceptable? Stack rank your genocides for me with those you find most acceptable at the top, and those more reprehensible at the bottom. The Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, the Holodomor, the Rape of Nanking, the Serbian Problem in Croatia, the Partition of India, the Biafra, the Killing Fields, the Burundian Genocide, and lastly the blossoming genocide in South Africa. Thanks in advance. Love that you want to "rank" human suffering!!!!!!!!! This is also a very popular idea with White Supremacists. Also, in your list of genocides, it seems there's A FEW MAJOR ONES missing. Do you know what they might be? Both seem pretty relevant these days... Have you considered doing any research into genocides in American history? Since it's a subject you're interested in, there's a lot to find there. Edited June 9, 2020 by GregPersons
Reality Check Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 3 minutes ago, GregPersons said: Close. Your certainty that you could not be racist is what proves you are racist. Yes. Do you think you can figure out why that is? Hint: It is what is in all of your posts, and what I have repeatedly describes as the "oxygen" of racism. Love that you want to "rank" human suffering!!!!!!!!! This is also a very popular idea with White Supremacists. What is your solution to black on black violence?
njbuff Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Reality Check said: What is your solution to black on black violence? Don't you care about white on white crime you racist you? Edited June 9, 2020 by njbuff 1
B-Man Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 2 minutes ago, njbuff said: Wait, Does Gregpersons amuse you? does he make you laugh ?
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, GregPersons said: Love that you want to "rank" human suffering!!!!!!!!! This is also a very popular idea with White Supremacists. Also, in your list of genocides, it seems there's A FEW MAJOR ONES missing. Do you know what they might be? Both seem pretty relevant these days... Have you considered doing any research into genocides in American history? Since it's a subject you're interested in, there's a lot to find there. Wrong, I’ve asked you to rank human suffering because your posts here seem to imply that there are certain genocides that don’t merit concern. These aren’t words that I’ve chosen to use, they are words that you have chosen to use. If you don’t like it, choose to use different words. As for the list, it’s be no means comprehensive. If you have any personal favorite genocides that I failed to include in my brief list, feel free to add them, and feel free to share a few anecdotes about why you enjoy them. Once you’re done with that, I’ll happily hear you lecture me about what my stances on the American government are, as I’m sure you’re more informed of them than I am. Edited June 9, 2020 by TakeYouToTasker
meazza Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 16 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: A White Russian, of course! Are you a nihilist ?
GregPersons Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 Just now, TakeYouToTasker said: Wrong, I’ve asked you to rank human suffering because your posts here seem to imply that there are certain genocides that don’t merit concern. These aren’t words that I’ve chosen to use, they are words that you have chosen to use. If you don’t like it, choose to use different words. As for the list, it’s be nice means comprehensive. If you have any personal favorite genocides that I failed to include in my brief list, feel free to add them, and feel free to share a few anecdotes about why you enjoy them. Once you’re done with that, I’ll happily hear you lecture me about what my stances on the American government are, as I’m sure you’re more informed of them than I am. That's a lot of words to dodge some pretty easy questions. Define "Racism" for me, since you have the "objective" answer. Then tell me if "objectivity" is real. And I'd also like to know why you failed to include any of the American examples, since that's more relevant to our discussion. I'm guessing it's because White Americans were the ones who did them and it's not helpful to your argument. But I don't want to put any words in your mouth. So just go ahead and educate me on the correct definitions on "Racism" and "Objectivity" and which one of those is real. Can't wait to be educated by The Smartest Man In The ROOM!
3rdnlng Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 Has anyone called him Hogboy in any of the recent threads? If not then he's been around a long time to know that name.
Reality Check Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 2 minutes ago, GregPersons said: That's a lot of words to dodge some pretty easy questions. Define "Racism" for me, since you have the "objective" answer. Then tell me if "objectivity" is real. And I'd also like to know why you failed to include any of the American examples, since that's more relevant to our discussion. I'm guessing it's because White Americans were the ones who did them and it's not helpful to your argument. But I don't want to put any words in your mouth. So just go ahead and educate me on the correct definitions on "Racism" and "Objectivity" and which one of those is real. Can't wait to be educated by The Smartest Man In The ROOM!
Chef Jim Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 11 minutes ago, GregPersons said: Close. Your certainty that you could not be racist is what proves you are racist. Yes. Do you think you can figure out why that is? Hint: It is what is in all of your posts, and what I have repeatedly describes as the "oxygen" of racism. This is ***** hilarious. I've never seen anyone tap dance around a direct question better than you have done. Bra*****ingvo!! So what you're saying is: If I was adamant about not being gay does that in fact make me gay or does this only work with being a racist? If I was adamant about not being an alcoholic does that in fact make me an alcoholic or does this only work with being a racist? If I was adamant about not being homophobic does that in fact make me homophobic or does that just work with being a racist? So if I'm adamant about not being a racist I'm a racist and if I say I'm a racist I'm a racists. Did I get this right? And finally I have NOT been adamant about being racist. As a matter of fact I don't even think I've said I'm NOT a racists. All I've done the past couple days is ask you to provide proof that I AM a racist which you have conveniently not been able to do. So you can ***** off now.
GregPersons Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: Has anyone called him Hogboy in any of the recent threads? If not then he's been around a long time to know that name. Repeatedly I'm keeping a handy list of all of the identities I've been given by people who are "not racist" I'm also keeping a handy list of all of the identities I've ascribed to posters here. It's actually 0, despite everybody assuming "racist" is an identity they have to have and my insistence that "racist" is better understood as a verb, not a noun. So everybody is assuming they're being called "a racist" as their identity. Then trying to guess my identity. While I am talking about racist actions. And the majority of the board continues speaking and behaving racist, while telling me my identity, and also that they could not be racist because of their daddy and granddaddy. If you could understand why that is so funny, we'd both be laughing right now!
Golden Goat Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 50 minutes ago, GregPersons said: This is the 16th identity I've been ascribed and I can't wait to find out more. Okay, make that 17, then.
GregPersons Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 Just now, Chef Jim said: This is ***** hilarious. I've never seen anyone tap dance around a direct question better than you have done. Bra*****ingvo!! So what you're saying is: If I was adamant about not being gay does that in fact make me gay or does this only work with being a racist? If I was adamant about not being an alcoholic does that in fact make me an alcoholic or does this only work with being a racist? If I was adamant about not being homophobic does that in fact make me homophobic or does that just work with being a racist? So if I'm adamant about not being a racist I'm a racist and if I say I'm a racist I'm a racists. Did I get this right? And finally I have NOT been adamant about being racist. As a matter of fact I don't even think I've said I'm NOT a racists. All I've done the past couple days is ask you to provide proof that I AM a racist which you have conveniently not been able to do. So you can ***** off now. This is your own confusion between "racist" and "a racist" — also why I posted the 101 thread. I'm talking about actions, you're talking about identity. Just like billsfan1959, all you are doing is getting mad at me because you tricked yourself.
Chef Jim Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 1 minute ago, GregPersons said: This is your own confusion between "racist" and "a racist" — also why I posted the 101 thread. I'm talking about actions, you're talking about identity. Just like billsfan1959, all you are doing is getting mad at me because you tricked yourself. What actions (or probably more inactions) are you referring to that say I'm a racist?
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 11 minutes ago, meazza said: Are you a nihilist ? Hey buddy, I'm a lover, not a fighter! Note: I do reject religion, but I do not believe life is meaningless. 1
Reality Check Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 2 minutes ago, GregPersons said: This is your own confusion between "racist" and "a racist" — also why I posted the 101 thread. I'm talking about actions, you're talking about identity. Just like billsfan1959, all you are doing is getting mad at me because you tricked yourself. What is your solution to black on black violence?
njbuff Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 28 minutes ago, B-Man said: Is that like the media's "White Hispanic" ?
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 1 minute ago, GregPersons said: That's a lot of words to dodge some pretty easy questions. Define "Racism" for me, since you have the "objective" answer. Then tell me if "objectivity" is real. And I'd also like to know why you failed to include any of the American examples, since that's more relevant to our discussion. I'm guessing it's because White Americans were the ones who did them and it's not helpful to your argument. But I don't want to put any words in your mouth. So just go ahead and educate me on the correct definitions on "Racism" and "Objectivity" and which one of those is real. Can't wait to be educated by The Smartest Man In The ROOM! If an American genocide is your favorite, by all means add it to your list! The list is yours, after all, and I don’t want to influence you one way of the other. The short sampling I provided you with was limited to acts of the last roughly 100 years, and only scratched the surface of genocides globally during that time. As for the definition of racist, it has already been provided for you by another poster, and was provided early on in your short stay. Moving on to your inquiry about objectivity, where you imply that logic itself is racist, and will no doubt continue on to that there is no truth but instead there are 7 billion or so personal truths; again I‘ll simply ask why you’re taking up my task in our argument, and working hard to defeat yourself.
GregPersons Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 Just now, Chef Jim said: What actions (or probably more inactions) are you referring to that say I'm a racist? Read the 101 thread for a full explanation, then you may continue with me. You don't get to skip to 201 by walking out of 101 and saying it's all BS, bud.
Recommended Posts