Jump to content

Will he?  

32 members have voted

  1. 1. Will our beloved Mr. Persons continue to beat his wife?

    • Yes
      28
    • Yes
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

You're right. Mistook you for Buffalo_Gal, my bad.

 

Easy mistake to make, considering our similar posting styles, avatars, and user names.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, GregPersons said:

 

Why am I scary?

 

I wasn't cheering on the injury of a 70+ year old white man by BPD. That was you.

I wasn't trying to figure out your real identity. That was also you.

 

You are scary, Karen. 

 

Hey @MILFHUNTER#518 do you think my lynching analogy is off-base

What is your solution to black on black violence?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

I love it.

 

New guy demands that we revise the definition of words to suit his arguments, which are purposed for the mainstreaming of neo-marxism, and if we do not then we are simply labeled the thing that his new definition portends.

 

Nothing but circular logic and the insistence that his power words are actually powerful. 
 

Hint:  they aren’t

 

Second hint:  your attempt to redefine terms in order that they better suit your argument has been rejected.

 

 

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Easy mistake to make, considering our similar posting styles, avatars, and user names.


I always wanted to be an attorney!!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I love it.

 

New guy ...

 

 

 

Highly unlikely it's a "new guy" 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted

 

1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I love it.

 

New guy demands that we revise the definition of words to suit his arguments, which are purposed for the mainstreaming of neo-marxism, and if we do not then we are simply labeled the thing that his new definition portends.

 

Nothing but circular logic and the insistence that his power words are actually powerful. 
 

Hint:  they aren’t

 

Second hint:  your attempt to redefine terms in order that they better suit your argument has been rejected.

 

 

 

I like that you think the "revised definition" is my invention. And that the "old definition" is the "correct" one. I like that you think Racism is something that is submitted to you, for your review.

 

You, in particular, are a huge White Supremacist and I've seen your name come up every time I searched KKK talking points in this forum. You seem concerned in particular about something called "White genocide" 

 

You're the worst kind because you're like Glenn Beck, you have this soft approach of like "I'm just listening" but all of your conclusions are hardcore White Supremacist.

 

Again. The forum has a search function. Most of you have thousands of posts. There are no new racist arguments or ideas, I'm sorry to tell you.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

 

I like that you think the "revised definition" is my invention. And that the "old definition" is the "correct" one. I like that you think Racism is something that is submitted to you, for your review.

 

You, in particular, are a huge White Supremacist and I've seen your name come up every time I searched KKK talking points in this forum. You seem concerned in particular about something called "White genocide" 

 

You're the worst kind because you're like Glenn Beck, you have this soft approach of like "I'm just listening" but all of your conclusions are hardcore White Supremacist.

 

Again. The forum has a search function. Most of you have thousands of posts. There are no new racist arguments or ideas, I'm sorry to tell you.

 

 

Cool there are KKK talking points?  What are they?  I want to search them too! 

 

Please screen shot this racists posts.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

 

I like that you think the "revised definition" is my invention. And that the "old definition" is the "correct" one. I like that you think Racism is something that is submitted to you, for your review.

 

You, in particular, are a huge White Supremacist and I've seen your name come up every time I searched KKK talking points in this forum. You seem concerned in particular about something called "White genocide" 

 

You're the worst kind because you're like Glenn Beck, you have this soft approach of like "I'm just listening" but all of your conclusions are hardcore White Supremacist.

 

Again. The forum has a search function. Most of you have thousands of posts. There are no new racist arguments or ideas, I'm sorry to tell you.

 

  You listen to Glenn Beck?  Tell me what he is like.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

I assume he gets that a lot.  @Buffalo_Gal is a bit taller but I think it's the heels. 

 

Is that true @Koko78? What's your height?

3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Cool there are KKK talking points?  What are they?  I want to search them too! 

 

Please screen shot this racists posts.  

 

KKK Jim.png

Posted
7 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I love it.

 

New guy demands that we revise the definition of words to suit his arguments, which are purposed for the mainstreaming of neo-marxism, and if we do not then we are simply labeled the thing that his new definition portends.

 

Nothing but circular logic and the insistence that his power words are actually powerful. 
 

Hint:  they aren’t

 

Second hint:  your attempt to redefine terms in order that they better suit your argument has been rejected.

 

 

 

Why people continue to engage these jackholes I do not know. I made that mistake today and I learned my lesson. I'm all for an honest exchange of ideas with anyone, but I think after 30+ strikes...you're out.

Posted
4 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

 

I like that you think the "revised definition" is my invention. And that the "old definition" is the "correct" one. I like that you think Racism is something that is submitted to you, for your review.

 

You, in particular, are a huge White Supremacist and I've seen your name come up every time I searched KKK talking points in this forum. You seem concerned in particular about something called "White genocide" 

 

You're the worst kind because you're like Glenn Beck, you have this soft approach of like "I'm just listening" but all of your conclusions are hardcore White Supremacist.

 

Again. The forum has a search function. Most of you have thousands of posts. There are no new racist arguments or ideas, I'm sorry to tell you.

 


Ohhhh, I remember you now.

 

You’re the dope whose ass I handed to him several years back when your issue of the day was gun control.

 

You haven’t gotten much better at making arguments since then.

 

Your power words are powerless, any argument which relies entirely on the mutability of language is born a loser, and anyone who substitutes what he thinks are clever personal attacks in place of an argument has already lost.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)

I think you should substitute wife with husband in the thread title.

 

The person mentioned in the thread title screams of that.

Edited by njbuff
Posted
1 minute ago, Golden Goat said:

 

Yup. And so damned TRIGGERED over the ban. ?

 

Well, if it is actually Q-Baby, this persona is far more entertaining.

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...