"One Buffalo: Racism Isn't Real" video

[GregPersons]

8 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Did joe have a mullet 25 years ago or did s muskrat climb on his neck?

 

Looks a bit Trumpish!

[GregPersons]

30 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

The above is as far as I got.  So let me get this straight.  If I oppress someone because they have red hair that's racism?  Good lord dude.  We waited nearly 24 hour for you to come back and ***** up the definition THAT badly?   Bwahahahahahhaha!  

 

I won't debate you.  You're too ***** dumb to waste my time with.  

 

Well, I can tell you, you didn't get that straight with your red hair example. You would know it if you read and processed, but I've seen enough from you to know that is not really your strong suit. 

 

If you are "oppress" red hair in our reality, no, that's not racism. That is prejudice and discrimination.

If you were to hypothetically create an alternate reality that systemically oppressed people with red hair, yes, that would be racism. Good "alternate universe" hypothetical, champ.

 

Your comprehension is just so embarrassingly off-base, I would like to laugh, but I actually just feel overwhelming pity because you are actually putting in some effort, generally, in your appearances here. 

 

You are the result of the American education system. You are the result of over-funding police and under-funding schools. We have to share the country with people like yourself, who in their attempt to understand racism, can only laugh and compare it to teasing red-haired kids. Not only do we share the same amount of rights, the system is designed to give the absolute least deserving people the most advantages.

 

You don't even recognize you have an advantage, this is how unaware you are. It's like you're playing Madden on extra-easy with 15000 handicap and thinking you're a world champion or something. I'm trying to think of another analogy you could comprehend. It's hard to explain to a dumb person what it's like to experience them, because they really have no knowledge of themselves or any ability to think outside of themselves. 

 

 

Edited June 8, 2020 by GregPersons

[Chef Jim]

Just now, GregPersons said:

 

 

If you were to hypothetically create an alternate reality that systemically oppressed people with red hair, yes, that would be racism. Good "alternate universe" hypothetical, champ.

 

 

Is the oppression of transgender people racism?  

[B-Man]

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Is the oppression of transgender people racism?  

 

 

depends on their skin pigmentation.

 

.

[GregPersons]

1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:

Is the oppression of transgender people racism?  

 

I love that you guys go from "I didn't read any of this Marxist Chinese Maoist bull####" to "Can I just ask a question?"  — ON A DIME.

 

Speaks volumes.

[keepthefaith]

18 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

Well, I can tell you, you didn't get that straight with your red hair example. You would know it if you read and processed, but I've seen enough from you to know that is not really your strong suit. 

 

If you are "oppress" red hair in our reality, no, that's not racism. That is prejudice and discrimination.

If you were to hypothetically create an alternate reality that systemically oppressed people with red hair, yes, that would be racism. Good "alternate universe" hypothetical, champ.

 

Your comprehension is just so embarrassingly off-base, I would like to laugh, but I actually just feel overwhelming pity because you are actually putting in some effort, generally, in your appearances here. 

 

You are the result of the American education system. You are the result of over-funding police and under-funding schools. We have to share the country with people like yourself, who in their attempt to understand racism, can only laugh and compare it to teasing red-haired kids. Not only do we share the same amount of rights, the system is designed to give the absolute least deserving people the most advantages.

 

You don't even recognize you have an advantage, this is how unaware you are. It's like you're playing Madden on extra-easy with 15000 handicap and thinking you're a world champion or something. I'm trying to think of another analogy you could comprehend. It's hard to explain to a dumb person what it's like to experience them, because they really have no knowledge of themselves or any ability to think outside of themselves. 

 

 

 

You have posted pages and pages of stuff over the past week, none of which actually defines the problems or solutions you are postulating.  How about bringing this back to square one and giving us some present day data points that support any of your claims?  And for the record I do understand that racism still exists. It's waning though IMO and I'm interested in hearing more about what you're claiming are the sweeping embedded societal problems.  Facts though and numbers please. 

Edited June 8, 2020 by keepthefaith

[Chef Jim]

18 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

I love that you guys go from "I didn't read any of this Marxist Chinese Maoist bull####" to "Can I just ask a question?"  — ON A DIME.

 

Speaks volumes.

 

Is the oppression of a transgender person racism? 

[keepthefaith]

9 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Is the oppression of a transgender person racism? 

 

Come on Jimmy, no trick questions. 

[GregPersons]

24 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Is the oppression of a transgender person racism? 

 

Didn't your other post in the Racism thread just laugh and boast about not reading any of it? But now you're in your strappy shoes all coquettish like "Aw c'mon mister Persons, I just want to ask one widdle question.... pwease"  

 

So the entitlement, that's fun. But also I like this thing too that the rest of humanity is your personal google, like everybody owes you explanations, and if it isn't to your satisfaction, then it isn't real. It's funny because you don't realize where you get ANY of these traits from. You just think they're your cute li'l quirks!

 

Anyway it's not a terrible question, even though you mean it with vile intent. I mean, it's... it's really stupid, since the answer to the question is in the question, but it's... I think maybe it's just a change of pace from being asked the same 2 questions repeatedly. 

 

If I explain to you the framework of how to understand systemic gender oppression in America, which is the discussion in which trans people would be relevant as that is a question of gender not race, I'm going to get carpal tunnel and you're not going to read it anyway. 

 

Race and gender are different classifications. They are similar in more ways than they are not; the definition for racism is not so different from the definition of patriarchy. But like "systemic" and "systematic" even though they are similar, they are not identical. Essentially, both race and gender are constructs that are built around taking physical attributes and insisting that a character trait must follow. 

 

The real truth is that we're all fleshy hairy mouth-breathing farting cumming giant babies who, at best, learn the value of their own life before they die, and are able to appreciate it, and share that love and life as much as possible. Genetics are hack. Look in your family trees. See the same faces repeat. That's all "race" is. Out of the primordial ooze, these various physical traits emerged as separate DNA strands and came to define humanity. We had to impose a reason on the fact that we looked different. It couldn't just be "people look different and come from different places." There had to be an objective reason. (Again, objectivity is a lie and method of control; see Racism FAQ)

 

You can have any skin tone, nose, hair, size, genitals and be any kind of character. That's the real reality. The reality imposed by patriarchy & racism through various methods of control, all of which sound like crazy conspiracy theories but all documented like COINTELPRO and all sort of subtle and overt manipulations to control the "race" problem. 

 

Race as a concept was not invented by America; it came earlier — but the generation of writers who invented race had big influences on the generation of men who became the framers of the Constitution.  Were we assuming it was somehow an accident that all of the Founding Fathers were slave owners and built a society on the economic engine of slavery? Did Washington and Jefferson just go "oopsy, didn't occur to me"?

 

Do you not see how this is all ***** Santa Claus and you're still putting out the cookies like a total mark? Meanwhile "Santa" is going through the house and taking everything you own. It doesn't hold up to any scrutiny if you think about it.

 

It's all BS. It's the Matrix. It's propaganda crap that as Americans we all thought we were too smart and clever and special to ever fall for something like that. But it's right there, and it's obvious as hell once you see it.

[Chef Jim]

13 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

Didn't your other post in the Racism thread just laugh and boast about not reading any of it? But now you're in your strappy shoes all coquettish like "Aw c'mon mister Persons, I just want to ask one widdle question.... pwease"  

 

So the entitlement, that's fun. But also I like this thing too that the rest of humanity is your personal google, like everybody owes you explanations, and if it isn't to your satisfaction, then it isn't real. It's funny because you don't realize where you get ANY of these traits from. You just think they're your cute li'l quirks!

 

Anyway it's not a terrible question, even though you mean it with vile intent. I mean, it's... it's really stupid, since the answer to the question is in the question, but it's... I think maybe it's just a change of pace from being asked the same 2 questions repeatedly. 

 

If I explain to you the framework of how to understand systemic gender oppression in America, which is the discussion in which trans people would be relevant as that is a question of gender not race, I'm going to get carpal tunnel and you're not going to read it anyway. 

 

Race and gender are different classifications. They are similar in more ways than they are not; the definition for racism is not so different from the definition of patriarchy. But like "systemic" and "systematic" even though they are similar, they are not identical. Essentially, both race and gender are constructs that are built around taking physical attributes and insisting that a character trait must follow. 

 

The real truth is that we're all fleshy hairy mouth-breathing farting cumming giant babies who, at best, learn the value of their own life before they die, and are able to appreciate it, and share that love and life as much as possible. Genetics are hack. Look in your family trees. See the same faces repeat. That's all "race" is. Out of the primordial ooze, these various physical traits emerged as separate DNA strands and came to define humanity. We had to impose a reason on the fact that we looked different. It couldn't just be "people look different and come from different places." There had to be an objective reason. (Again, objectivity is a lie and method of control; see Racism FAQ)

 

You can have any skin tone, nose, hair, size, genitals and be any kind of character. That's the real reality. The reality imposed by patriarchy & racism through various methods of control, all of which sound like crazy conspiracy theories but all documented like COINTELPRO and all sort of subtle and overt manipulations to control the "race" problem. 

 

Race as a concept was not invented by America; it came earlier — but the generation of writers who invented race had big influences on the generation of men who became the framers of the Constitution.  Were we assuming it was somehow an accident that all of the Founding Fathers were slave owners and built a society on the economic engine of slavery? Did Washington and Jefferson just go "oopsy, didn't occur to me"?

 

Do you not see how this is all ***** Santa Claus and you're still putting out the cookies like a total mark? Meanwhile "Santa" is going through the house and taking everything you own. It doesn't hold up to any scrutiny if you think about it.

 

It's all BS. It's the Matrix. It's propaganda crap that as Americans we all thought we were too smart and clever and special to ever fall for something like that. But it's right there, and it's obvious as hell once you see it.

 

A simple no would have sufficed.  

[GregPersons]

1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:

 

A simple no would have sufficed.  

 

[Deranged Rhino]

Found @GregPersons

 

 

[MILFHUNTER#518]

1 hour ago, GregPersons said:

 

Reality can be challenging! 

 

Did you assume that language did not change? 

 

Did you think the language of racism has not changed? Why are you calling them "Black and Brown" people then? 

 

Change is hard! 

I hear prominent Dems on MSDNC and fake news CNN use those terms all damned day, so stop.

 

Last I checked, English is English. I did not realize virtue signaling has risen to the level of changing the English language. 

[Chef Jim]

14 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

 

How many threads are you going to post this garbage in?  White people are "Hitler's mustache" to him?  

 

Must suck being that hateful and ignorant.  

 

This ***** is really frowned upon down here.  

[Wacka]

1 hour ago, GregPersons said:

 

Looks a bit Trumpish!

I thought "Plugs" Biden got the hair plugs on the top of his head, not the back.  And uno are likely too young ti know, but bode had hair plugs done in the eatly 80s and they were bad, even for then.

[GregPersons]

9 minutes ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

I hear prominent Dems on MSDNC and fake news CNN use those terms all damned day, so stop.

 

Last I checked, English is English. I did not realize virtue signaling has risen to the level of changing the English language. 

 

Way to miss the point. I'm saying, the reason you are saying those terms instead of older terms — slurs — you're not saying the N word but your dad did — language evolves. 

 

Whether you like it or not. Time moves forward. Culture and language adapt to the people who use it. 

 

It is difficult for those in a cult obsessed with death to understand 

[Unforgiven]

59 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Found @GregPersons

 

 

Ill apologize with lunch when the 4 black youths who committed armed home invasion in my town

a couple weeks back get down on their hands and knees, wash my feet and apologize

for terrorizing law abiding citizens.

[SectionC3]

34 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

Ill apologize with lunch when the 4 black youths who committed armed home invasion in my town

a couple weeks back get down on their hands and knees, wash my feet and apologize

for terrorizing law abiding citizens.

A bunch of white dudes for nailed for insider trading awhile back.  So no free lunches for white dudes either, right? 

1 hour ago, Wacka said:

I thought "Plugs" Biden got the hair plugs on the top of his head, not the back.  And uno are likely too young ti know, but bode had hair plugs done in the eatly 80s and they were bad, even for then.

Kind of how like Trump’s ***** fake tan would have been ***** 20 years ago, and is even more shirty now.  

[Beast]

well....

Edited June 9, 2020 by Beast

[Joe Miner]

1 hour ago, Beast said:

well....

 

 

That just proves racism.

 

Obviously whites are too racist to even know any black people.

 

If they weren't so racist they would know more black people and then kill them.

 

They're secretly racist to hide their overt racism.

 

It's science.