Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

The only thing I can think of is that Jill really, really has her heart set on becoming a First Lady. It's wrong but why in hell else would she consent to putting him through all of this in his condition? 

 

5 hours ago, DFT said:

I believe otherwise which led me to change my stance several months ago when it seemed to come to a head.  I believe that what is motivating Jill is something much more unfortunate.  She wants to protect her husband’s and son’s livelihoods and legacies from what could be uncovered by the Ukraine investigations and other political controversies that are unraveling in front of America.  It’s the only thing I can put even limited sense around her reasoning to be so complicit.  

 

Pretty much this.  If Biden wins, all pressure to investigate Hunter goes away.  Also, all the other goodies that Joe steered towards his other relatives disappear back under the radar as well.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Taro T said:

 

 

Pretty much this.  If Biden wins, all pressure to investigate Hunter goes away.  Also, all the other goodies that Joe steered towards his other relatives disappear back under the radar as well.


If Trump wins or loses - he will still be investigated.

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Foxx said:

you libs... when you constantly lose to the teleprompter, well...  :lol:

https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1301935491726684161

 

 

If these are the types of things you guys are hanging your hat on, you live in an alternate reality.

 

If you watched that entire speech and then Q&A, you'd understand the reality that Faux News, Breitbart, PPP and all the other far right conspiracy theorists are hanging their hats on Twitter moments as proof of a much broader discussion.

 

Clearly you haven't watched Biden's entire speeches and Q&As. If you did, you'd concede he's quite mentally capable of being Commander in Chief, especially when compared with Trump, who I admit has set a very low bar.

 

However, it's clear you and several others aren't going to understand any of this until November at least, so just come back to the main forum already. Just over a week until the season opener  :beer:

Posted
6 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

If these are the types of things you guys are hanging your hat on, you live in an alternate reality.

 

If you watched that entire speech and then Q&A, you'd understand the reality that Faux News, Breitbart, PPP and all the other far right conspiracy theorists are hanging their hats on Twitter moments as proof of a much broader discussion.

 

Clearly you haven't watched Biden's entire speeches and Q&As. If you did, you'd concede he's quite mentally capable of being Commander in Chief, especially when compared with Trump, who I admit has set a very low bar.

 

However, it's clear you and several others aren't going to understand any of this until November at least, so just come back to the main forum already. Just over a week until the season opener  :beer:

Biden might do ok if we got into another spat with Grenada. As far as standing on the stage with world leaders he's badly lacking. He'd be like Barney Fife going toe to toe with Dolph Lundgren. Biden has very little mental acuity but just as bad he has no long term philosophy or moral compass to fall back on. In the 90's he championed a bill that incarcerated blacks at a much higher rate and a much longer duration because they chose to break the law in a slightly different way than whites. He openly celebrated this along with his past KKK connections and disdain for people of color. He now wants to defund or "reallocate" funds for law and order in our country and had to finally reject the violence, looting and arson by mobs only because the polls told him he needed to. He still won't call a spade a spade by denouncing the domestic terrorist group BLM and the international terrorist group Antifa. Think about this: he doesn't have the balls to stand up and reject their terrorism because they form a good share of his party. He is afraid of scum who spend their time beating up elderly people, burning down pizza shops and looting Macy's in order to get their "reparations". How could he ever stand up to Putin and Xi?

 

Let's say we were to have another crisis similar to The Cuban Missile Crises? For those of you not intimately familiar with it JFK stood firm against Kruschev and made him turn his ships around rather than install nuclear tipped missiles 90 miles from our shore. It was as close to a war between two nuclear powers as it gets. Fast forward to today. Does anyone want Biden standing up to any crises that might occur? Joe and his boss have already shown how they handle foreign policy by giving the world's foremost terrorist state 1.8 billion in cash and a 150 billion release of funds. Even more perplexing, they gave Iran a path to nuclear arms. Joe Biden is nothing more than a figurehead who would ostensibly preside over an executive branch being pulled in all directions by the likes of a 30 year old former bartender, an elderly communist, two Californian women, one who thinks she's a Queen and the other that flips her wig and encourages people to harass their political opponents at restaurants and or gas stations. Oh, and a committee chairman who worries that Guam might tip over. These are the people that will be setting policy for Joe to implement. 

Posted
13 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

If these are the types of things you guys are hanging your hat on, you live in an alternate reality.

 

If you watched that entire speech and then Q&A, you'd understand the reality that Faux News, Breitbart, PPP and all the other far right conspiracy theorists are hanging their hats on Twitter moments as proof of a much broader discussion.

 

Clearly you haven't watched Biden's entire speeches and Q&As. If you did, you'd concede he's quite mentally capable of being Commander in Chief, especially when compared with Trump, who I admit has set a very low bar.

 

However, it's clear you and several others aren't going to understand any of this until November at least, so just come back to the main forum already. Just over a week until the season opener  :beer:

 

It's hard to believe anyone would try to defend Biden's current mental acuity.  Even the lefties I know are talking about his lapses.   

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, keepthefaith said:

 

It's hard to believe anyone would try to defend Biden's current mental acuity.  Even the lefties I know are talking about his lapses.   

....they're rollin' out Joe........uh oh...............

 

Losing your marbles?: There's a saying... - British Lung Foun...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

It's hard to believe anyone would try to defend Biden's current mental acuity.  Even the lefties I know are talking about his lapses.   

 

He is stuck and going down with the ship. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

It's hard to believe anyone would try to defend Biden's current mental acuity.  Even the lefties I know are talking about his lapses.   

 

Your confusion can be very easily cleared up:

 

Look who he's running against.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
Posted
55 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He is stuck and going down with the ship. 

 

And you are scared as you cower in a corner in the safety of your fellow conspiracy theorists.

 

You know Donald Trump is losing in November and you're going to be saddled with a beautiful Biden avatar for a year. You've clearly been slowly coming to that critical stage of grief--acceptance--over the last month or 2. 

 

Hopefully you're fully immersed in that stage by November... who knows, maybe you'll grow to love and appreciate your new avatar.

Posted
7 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Biden might do ok if we got into another spat with Grenada. As far as standing on the stage with world leaders he's badly lacking. He'd be like Barney Fife going toe to toe with Dolph Lundgren. Biden has very little mental acuity but just as bad he has no long term philosophy or moral compass to fall back on. In the 90's he championed a bill that incarcerated blacks at a much higher rate and a much longer duration because they chose to break the law in a slightly different way than whites. He openly celebrated this along with his past KKK connections and disdain for people of color. He now wants to defund or "reallocate" funds for law and order in our country and had to finally reject the violence, looting and arson by mobs only because the polls told him he needed to. He still won't call a spade a spade by denouncing the domestic terrorist group BLM and the international terrorist group Antifa. Think about this: he doesn't have the balls to stand up and reject their terrorism because they form a good share of his party. He is afraid of scum who spend their time beating up elderly people, burning down pizza shops and looting Macy's in order to get their "reparations". How could he ever stand up to Putin and Xi?

Has Trump?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Kamala and Jill will keep pointing Joe in the right direction,  no problem. I doubt Trump would ever take advice from anyone.

Posted
56 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Has Trump?

 

How many times has he denounced the rioters and anarchists? When he does that he is denouncing them while not falling into the lefts trap of calling them by name. 

×
×
  • Create New...