Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Kamala Harris accidentally touts plans under a 'Harris administration' during virtual roundtable

 

Kamala Harris, Joe Biden's running mate in the 2020 election, raised eyebrows on Monday evening after she accidentally touted economic plans under a "Harris administration."

 

Speaking during a virtual roundtable with small business owners in Arizona, Harris vowed that they will have an ally in the White House with the campaign's "Build Back Better" initiative.

 

However, the California senator appeared to briefly suggest that she was at the top of the Democratic ticket.

 

"A Harris administration, together with Joe Biden as the president of the United States," she said. She quickly clarified, "The Biden-Harris administration will provide access to $100 billion in low-interest loans and investments from minority business owners."

 

Many on social media questioned whether Harris' misstatement was a "Freudian slip" as critics of the Biden candidacy insist that former VP is a placeholder for the liberal senator.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-accidentally-touts-plans-in-a-harris-administration-during-virtual-roundtable

 

See no worry if Joe is elected 🙂

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Chef Jim said:


I hope you have kids because I had to google that. No really I did. 

I didn't because I had one.  It seemed like a good idea at the time but it was a piece of crap.  Of course it broke during the worst rainstorm of the year.

Posted

                Advanced age + senility + dementia = DNC's fatally flawed candidate for President.  

 

For an encore, the accompanying candidate isn't sure of her lineage at any one time, and has accused the top of the ticket of racism and sexual abuse.

 

 

Just an all 'round attractive package, eh?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

I didn't because I had one.  It seemed like a good idea at the time but it was a piece of crap.  Of course it broke during the worst rainstorm of the year.


They still make those?

Posted
11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

This from the CEO of Protests, Looting, and Mayhem Inc.  

 

Just another Democrat enunciating his definition of a smooth transition of power.    These people are just begging to lose the election. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:

"Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in its 175-year history. This year we are compelled to do so. We do not do this lightly.


The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people."
 

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

You are either for the Enlightenment or for the cult 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Chandemonium said:

You could say the same thing about him tweeting about banning so-called assault weapons...

 

Those tweets tell you all you need to know about the Democratic ticket: two police officers are shot by a BLM member, and the second thing Biden wants to do is take your guns away.

 

Because the first thing Biden wants to do is defund the police.

 

No police to protect you. No guns to protect yourself. The Harris-Biden plan is pretty damn clear.

 

And please don't tell me Joe doesn't want to defund police because he admitted so in an interview, just like he spent the last bzillion years telling everyone he wants to ban fracking before he started losing PA.

 

BIden's first words are his true words. 

×
×
  • Create New...