Chef Jim Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: Apples and monkey wrenches.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 ...lemme get this straight...folks struggling to make ends meet on unemployment yet unemployed are the major donors??..what isn't passing "the smell test " here?.... Exclusive: Data shows that half of 2019 donations to ActBlue came from untraceable 'unemployed' donors A Take Back Action Fund analysis of $400M in donations to liberal causes raises red flags of possible foreign involvement By Hollie McKay | Fox News EXCLUSIVE: Less than two months ahead of the presidential election – with concerns of foreign interference again at the forefront – a conservative political group is raising "serious concerns" about millions of donations reported by a major Democratic fundraising platform. A preliminary computer analysis by the Take Back Action Fund, obtained exclusively by Fox News, has found that nearly half of all 2019 donations to ActBlue were made by people claiming to be unemployed. Action Fund President John Pudner questioned the veracity of those donations and called it a loophole that must be closed for the sake of election integrity. "After downloading hundreds of millions of [dollars in] donations to the Take Back Action Fund servers, we were shocked to see that almost half of the donations to ActBlue in 2019 claimed to be unemployed individuals," he said. "The name of employers must be disclosed when making political donations, but more than 4.7 million donations came from people who claimed they did not have an employer. Those 4.7 million donations totaled $346 million ActBlue raised and sent to liberal causes." The trend is continuing this year: An Action Fund examination of 2020 data from January through August showed an uptick in "unemployed" donations through ActBlue, to 50.1% this year. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exclusive-data-shows-that-half-of-2019-donations-to-actblue-came-from-untraceable-unemployed-donors
Koko78 Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 2 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Apples and monkey wrenches. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 2 hours ago, BillStime said: Not a hypothetical- why is a governor who put the most vulnerable to the illness close to those who are ill being praised? And in regards to this tweet the comparison has only one similarity- both can kill, every other comparison is improper therefore a stupid tweet. 1
BillStime Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: Not a hypothetical- why is a governor who put the most vulnerable to the illness close to those who are ill being praised? And in regards to this tweet the comparison has only one similarity- both can kill, every other comparison is improper therefore a stupid tweet. Was there malicious intent on Cuomo’s part? Did he have a choice? Did he know how many hospital beds he would need? Did anyone outside of the Trump administration have all the information? Remember - Trump is the one who withheld information and downplayed the severity of the virus. Imagine how many lives could have been saved if Trump didn’t care about himself. Dereliction of duty
Chef Jim Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, BillStime said: Was there malicious intent on Cuomo’s part? Did he have a choice? Did he know how many hospital beds he would need? Did anyone outside of the Trump administration have all the information? Remember - Trump is the one who withheld information and downplayed the severity of the virus. Imagine how many lives could have been saved if Trump didn’t care about himself. Dereliction of duty Did Cuomo have malicious intent. Hell no. Let me ask you. Did Trump? 1
BillStime Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 15 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Did Cuomo have malicious intent. Hell no. Let me ask you. Did Trump? You heard the tapes. He acknowledged the severity. How did he respond?
Chef Jim Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 15 minutes ago, BillStime said: You heard the tapes. He acknowledged the severity. How did he respond? You are dumb aren’t you? Do you understand what the word malicious means?
BillStime Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 Just now, Chef Jim said: You are dumb aren’t you? Do you understand what the word malicious means? Yup
Orlando Buffalo Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 1 hour ago, BillStime said: Was there malicious intent on Cuomo’s part? Did he have a choice? Did he know how many hospital beds he would need? Did anyone outside of the Trump administration have all the information? Remember - Trump is the one who withheld information and downplayed the severity of the virus. Imagine how many lives could have been saved if Trump didn’t care about himself. Dereliction of duty Why do you assume Cuomo did not malicious intent? And let me ask a different way also- if he had malicious intent what would he have done differently? Trump gave Cuomo the hospital ship that was not used. As for information it is amazing that Cuomo did not realize putting the sick in with most susceptible was a bad idea. But I want to focus on what would Cuomo have done differently if he had malicious intent?
B-Man Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 SUPER GAFFE-O-MATIC ’76: A Bad Day for the Biden Campaign. If only the Democratic nominee could have remained cosseted in friendly media’s comforting embrace until November, but there are voters beyond the base to reach. And as the Biden campaign has begun to emerge from its cocoon and engage with more adversarial reporters, the results suggest this campaign and its candidate are more flatfooted than their image-makers would have you believe. The first sign of distress came from the Fox News Channel. On Thursday, Biden campaign national press secretary TJ Ducklo sat down with anchor Brett Baier to discuss policy and respond to the Trump campaign’s criticisms. But the dyspeptic performance Ducklo turned in suggests the Biden campaign has bathed in soft coverage for so long that its political muscles have atrophied. If Ducklo conveyed anything to Fox’s audience throughout his seven-minute appearance, it was his intention to avoid answering questions—none of which were particularly difficult. Related: NYT: Here’s how Biden might already be blowing the 2020 election. And this brings us back to the point about 2016. Hillary Clinton had a huuuge money advantage and the good fortune of running against a candidate who was easy to personally dislike. She blew those advantages by running a national-messaging campaign rather than doing the retail politicking necessary to generate turnout. Even then, Clinton had at least some parity, as Trump also disdained that kind of GOTV effort, preferring to do rallies to stoke enthusiasm and then use targeted ads to replace the ground game. This time around, though, Trump and the RNC are investing heavily in that kind of retail politicking, while Biden isn’t investing at all in a ground game. He’s doing nothing but national messaging and occasional bungee visits to places where polling indicates trouble — which is why he’s heading to Minnesota next week, a state he should easily be carrying. If Russonello is correct about Biden’s strength in the suburbs, this state shouldn’t even be on Biden’s limited radar — and yet he’s breaking his bubble to appear here instead of, say, North Carolina, Florida, Georgia, or Arizona. Russonello’s right that Biden and Democrats should worry. He just is a little off on how much they should worry, and why it matters — and not just in the presidential election. And one last item on Ducklo’s train wreck interview: No, Biden Didn’t Support Trump’s China Travel Ban. Biden spox falsely claims Biden favored travel restrictions.
B-Man Posted September 13, 2020 Posted September 13, 2020 ANYONE SURPRISED ? Wow, Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign promises suddenly sound a LOT like Trump’s 2016 promises (that are currently being delivered)
Chef Jim Posted September 13, 2020 Posted September 13, 2020 16 hours ago, BillStime said: Yup Then explain how Trump’s actions were malicious and your proof of his maliciousness.
Recommended Posts