Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Curious to whom is in favor of defunding the police and the benefits of doing so?  If in favor of this, please help explain why this is better and the outcomes it will produce.  Any negative impacts?

Posted (edited)

No.

What could go wrong? No police to arrest someone breaking into your home, your business, stealing you car... oh I know! It would look like the stand-down orders in NYC.

Hard pass.

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Just Joshin' said:

Curious to whom is in favor of defunding the police and the benefits of doing so?  If in favor of this, please help explain why this is better and the outcomes it will produce.  Any negative impacts?

 Terrible idea.  Do you support it?

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Just Joshin' said:

Curious to whom is in favor of defunding the police and the benefits of doing so?  If in favor of this, please help explain why this is better and the outcomes it will produce.  Any negative impacts?

well for starters you know the regular ppp squad here is 100% in favor.
They will be here in a few minutes they have to call soros to find out exactly how to respond to this post.

 

Also this squad ...

 

RTX6ZQVL.jpg

 

Also the scowl on Presley's face makes me think there may be a concentration camp somewhere in my future.

Edited by Albwan
  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

 

27 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

DAVID BERNSTEIN:

 

There are plenty of police reforms that could be enacted from a libertarian perspective that would improve matters.

 

Qualified immunity reform is libertarian. Holding police accountable for misbehavior is libertarian. Reducing the power of police unions is libertarian. Getting rid of overtime and pension abuse is libertarian. Banning no-knock raids is libertarian. Reducing bloated police department bureaucracies is libertarian.

 

Broader reforms that would reduce the need for police and reduce police/civilian encounters are also libertarian. Getting rid of victimless crimes, especially the drug war, and certain categories of criminal business regulation that should be handled civilly is libertarian. Getting rid of taxes that lead to black markets that in turn lead to police/civilian encounters is libertarian. Abolishing laws that allow local governments to put people in jail for failure to pay civil fines is libertarian. Separating forensic science services from prosecutors’ offices is libertarian. Holding prosecutors accountable for misconduct is libertarian. Finding alternatives to prison for certain categories of offenders is libertarian.

 

By contrast, “defunding the police,” if that just means willy-nilly cuts, is not libertarian.

 

 

 

If you get rid of the police, they will be replaced by vigilante justice and mob “protection.”

 
 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Johnnycage46 said:

 Terrible idea.  Do you support it?

Not at all and can see no redeeming value.   Trying to understand why anyone would think it is a good idea.  The libs on here may be able to help with their POV.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, bilzfancy said:

The far left wants anarchy, to accomplish that, get rid of law enforcement

 

...defund police and depend on National Guard regular deployment to keep the peace....but the states pay for state based guard units.....oh well.....

Posted

It's a local issue for local communities to decide. A case can be made for shifting budgets to address non-criminal community issues that too often police are called to resolve.

 

Abolish the police? No. Stop asking police to do the jobs of social workers? Maybe. The devil's on the details. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

How come in states that have democratic governors mayors for years and years race relations are not better?  
 

Years under the Democrats has changed nothing. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted

I am in favor of a complete defunding and dismantlement of law enforcement agencies that operate in Democrat-controlled cities.

 

The entertainment value would be tremendous.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted

This worked when the Baltimore police stopped patrolling the streets... oh wait, crime sky rocketed and the populace demanded that the cops come back. Dems have zero brains that bring actual solutions. So dumb. So dumb. 

Posted

I'm sure I'm much too late as I'm sure some Twitter star or talking head have beaten me to it...but all of you who don't support defunding the police realize that you're racists.....again, right?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

...a woefully sick lib response to turn over the reigns to anarchy.....they are inept in confronting the problem head on so they bail as usual......ICE resistance, sanctuary cities, homelessness, defecating in the streets/establishments, allow to steal $945 in goods ...elect the weak who have no ability to come up with constructive solutions....they just cave and bail....we're screwed....throw in funding illegal immigrants with taxpayer dollars, etc...

Posted
2 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

...a woefully sick lib response to turn over the reigns to anarchy.....they are inept in confronting the problem head on so they bail as usual......ICE resistance, sanctuary cities, homelessness, defecating in the streets/establishments, allow to steal $945 in goods ...elect the weak who have no ability to come up with constructive solutions....they just cave and bail....we're screwed....throw in funding illegal immigrants with taxpayer dollars, etc...

Don't forget one of my favorites, letting criminals out of jail, no bail required on rioters

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Cuomo was mad no bail was being set on people setting fires, looting, and throwing bricks at cops. 
 

he is a total nut case 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...