Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Do you think an auto race that paid twice for second than first would be interesting to watch?

Posted
1 hour ago, Irv said:

Do you think an auto race that paid twice for second than first would be interesting to watch?

At some point, we have to accept the Super Bowl losses and move on.

  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

Watching the way the Bills' regular season ended and that pathetic display in the playoffs, I think we all know what it looks like when someone tries hard not to win.

Posted

You'd have to set a minimum speed and anyone going under that is automatically disqualified. Otherwise it would be a boring race to watch. Everyone just stopped, waiting for someone else to be first. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

What if the race involved a lottery ball system that would be drawn at the end to determine what position the winner would chosen from?

Or if they didn't reveal the random place the winner would be chosen from until the last lap?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Just Jack said:

You'd have to set a minimum speed and anyone going under that is automatically disqualified. Otherwise it would be a boring race to watch. Everyone just stopped, waiting for someone else to be first. 

I'd gun it and take first... has to be better than 3rd place in this scenario money wise.

13 hours ago, Gugny said:

Watching the way the Bills' regular season ended and that pathetic display in the playoffs, I think we all know what it looks like when someone tries hard not to win.

That was a touchdown, by rule. Not assumption. 

Posted
Just now, T&C said:

I'd gun it and take first... has to be better than 3rd place in this scenario money wise.

What would be interesting to see/find out, is how many racers would have egos that are too big to not come in first, even if the prize is less?

×
×
  • Create New...