Bob Lamb Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Is too much attention paid to a non-scientific measurement ? http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/nfl/2...-1s18forty.html
plenzmd1 Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Is too much attention paid to a non-scientific measurement ? http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/nfl/2...-1s18forty.html 308746[/snapback] That is a great article. Always thought that myself.
dave mcbride Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Is too much attention paid to a non-scientific measurement ? http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/nfl/2...-1s18forty.html 308746[/snapback] great piece!
eSJayDee Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Fascinating read. I seem to recall that OJs fastest 40 was like 4.43. If you doubt how fast he was, get an old Guinness book of World Records, where they still measure track events in yards & check out who ran the 3rd leg of the 4x100 yd relay. I'll give you a hint, he was at USC in '67 or '68 and his 1st name was Orethal.
Dan III Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Is too much attention paid to a non-scientific measurement ? http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/nfl/2...-1s18forty.html 308746[/snapback] great article.
Arkady Renko Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 I think one of the major columnists was making this point a few years ago. Was it Dr. Z?
BuckeyeBill Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Very nice article. I wonder if anyone will every break below a 4.0. Deion Sanders was once clocked near 4 flat... wasn't he? Who knows if it will ever happen. Just something to think about.
Recommended Posts