Augie Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 (edited) I have never been in favor of seeing another person lose their job, their livelihood. ........then along came Booger. He was bad, but then he made Dawkins sound like a dirty player with bad intentions in the playoff game when he mildly pushed a defender chasing his QB. He’s on the “Idiot List”, along with Marshall Faulk. . Edited May 10, 2020 by Augie
ehfeuh57 Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 SO Booger took down Tess with him? I guess its always a team?
CNYfan Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 1 hour ago, GETTOTHE50 said: No one, I mean no one, will ever be as bad as booger. Witten and Collinsworth come close though Witten was terrible, Collinsworth is annoying in a much different manner
CommonCents Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 5 minutes ago, DrDare said: SO Booger took down Tess with him? I guess its always a team? I can hear Tess’s voice still ringing in my ears. He may not have said as many idiotic things but he also sucked. 2
foreboding Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 I would take Collinsworth over Booger any day. Anyone but Booger, great job ESPN! 2
RaoulDuke79 Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 Can somebody just pay Romo a billion dollars to do every game? 3
hjnick Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 3 hours ago, Process said: Some good news. Everyone's always hating on Booger. They are both awful, but I always thought Tess was worse. Calls every play like it's a last second touchdown to win the Superbowl. I liked Tess. At least he was trying to bring some interesting takes. Honestly, Booger is such a black hole of an announcer, I don't care who you put with him, they are going down...
YoloinOhio Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 (edited) So who will be the guys in the booth? They said it will be internal. Maybe Dan Orlovsky in the color commentary role? I think he’s pretty good. play by play is tougher. Who is already at espn that can do it? Edited May 9, 2020 by YoloinOhio
Doc Brown Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 A no brainer would for them to just bring Harlan and Warner in from Westwood One. We already know what we're getting and it would be a significant upgrade. 3 1
YoloinOhio Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: A no brainer would for them to just bring Harlan and Warner in from Westwood One. We already know what we're getting and it would be a significant upgrade. Harlan is great 4 1
flomoe Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 The bigger problem, other than Booger and Tess, is that ESPN is producing an unwatchable broadcast. It doesn’t matter who is on the broadcast, it’s still another liberal abomination production from ESPN. Sports is not their main focus anymore, and it’s a shame. Their main focus now is making sure they have checked every “minority” box, talked about every boo hoo story and eliminate the basic foundation of what they’re broadcasting......the game of football and everything that it entails. ESPN is about entertainment, not sports. They need to cover the liberal agenda and not the basics of the game. 2
RiotAct Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 Beth Mowins PbP, with Jessica Mendoza on color commentary? 1
Nihilarian Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 I could only watch without sound on. Yeah, it was that bad.
stinky finger Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 1 hour ago, RaoulDuke79 said: Can somebody just pay Romo a billion dollars to do every game? I don’t get the love for Romo. He’s not that good. 1
RaoulDuke79 Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, inaugural balls said: I don’t get the love for Romo. He’s not that good. I guess it's all a matter of opinion. I think he's better than most everyone out there. 3
Augie Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 (edited) 38 minutes ago, inaugural balls said: I don’t get the love for Romo. He’s not that good. He gets attention for telling us what WILL happen.....BEFORE it happens. That was unique and demonstrated an understanding of the game no one before him had shown. I believe they told him to tone that down at some point. I don’t pay much attention to announcers, but Booger was the worst I can ever remember. Part of that is the idiotic comments about Dawkins. He didn’t say “technically, that’s the rule”. He implied it was dirty, and then The Booger lost me forever. . Edited May 10, 2020 by Augie 1 1
Boatdrinks Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 16 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said: I guess it's all a matter of opinion. I think he's better than most everyone out there. I Agree. Romo tells us what a team should be doing in any given situation in real time. He explains why a play worked and what was excellent about a player’s performance, or what was bad about it if it didn’t. He’s just about always right. As a game analyst, Romo is pretty great. 1 1
njbuff Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 I wish we could have the option of having crowd noise without announcers on our remotes. How much easier would it make watching football with no announcers but hear everything in the stadium?
Recommended Posts