Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, Logic said:

i actually think 17 is perfect for Allen. Plus, if he turns out to be a great one, he’ll “own” that number, as there has never been a truly great #17 in the NFL.

 

Don Meredith.

Posted
15 hours ago, Logic said:

 

I actually think 17 is perfect for Allen. Plus, if he turns out to be a great one, he’ll “own” that number, as there has never been a truly great #17 in the NFL.

Does Phillip Rivers count?

Posted
23 hours ago, Kmart128 said:

Also so weird to see Davis as 3. Im sure that will change after cuts

 

It has to change as its not allowed once season starts.

12 hours ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

#87 is the number of a crappy receiver.

 

Its actually cool for a new WR to have a number in the 80's again, you just haven't realized it yet, coming back around.

Posted
36 minutes ago, DrDare said:

 

It has to change as its not allowed once season starts.

 

Its actually cool for a new WR to have a number in the 80's again, you just haven't realized it yet, coming back around.


CeeDee Lamb took 88 for the cowboys. Wonder if a Renaissance is coming for 80 WR. Kinda makes sense. The teens were about players wanting to forge their own way, but now teen wr are everywhere. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Someone should have told him that # is cursed in Buffalo. He just ended his career.

I don’t believe in that stuff and he probably doesn’t either! 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
13 hours ago, whatdrought said:


CeeDee Lamb took 88 for the cowboys. Wonder if a Renaissance is coming for 80 WR. Kinda makes sense. The teens were about players wanting to forge their own way, but now teen wr are everywhere. 

I blame Keyshawn for bringing the teen number back and making it en vogue once again. Didn't like the teen numbers for Wr's at that time, but love them now. Every now and then I like to see a #81, #83, or #86 dominate besides a TE.

×
×
  • Create New...